making growth uncool again

You would think that after the financial crisis and decades of knowing about environmental pollution and human induced climate change we would change the way we do business. But the story we tell ourselves and each other about what an economy is is still based on the idea of limitless growth which can't be sustained on an inherently finite planet. In these precarious times the world seems to fall back on very simple (political) messages because out of fear our brains revert back to primal survival modes. That's perhaps why I was first opposed to this image of the doughnut but throughout the book have come to embrace it as the simple message and shared image the world needs to replace our old ideas. Kate was educated as an economist herself and admits that the people best fit to be the new world's economists are the ones not formally trained as one. Throughout the book she reveals how the ideas of Maynard Keynes, Adam Smith, Friedman and Stiglitz were used to push nations' agendas for GDP growth in a global financial market economy for which there seemed no alternative. Even though political and economical philosophers back to Aristotle have made a distinction between economics as the production of value in the household and the accumulation of wealth as something different, in capitalist society we have to come to regard the latter as the goal since we don't monetize the first. Kate is aware of the power of evoking mental (visual) frames and in the end talks about the economy as a plane that took of and has been flying ever since but we didn't really think how we would land it. Far from talking doomsday scenarios, she actually makes very concrete proposals to start thinking differently within the means of the planet and actually change the goal of what we're doing. She does not say it in these exact words but we should focus on human nature and happiness (learning skills, being connected, etc) rather than material gain beyond what we need to live well. We should create and economy in which everyone can thrive, us and the planet, regardless of whether the economy grows or not.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

Amazing and inspirering

Loved it, and it is very inspirering! strongly recommend it if you feel a bit overwhelmed by the state of the world and can't find comfort I. the traditional economic viewpoints.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

awfull

this book keeps focussing on graphics and images, all the while referring to the 'conpanion booklet'. if I had my hands and eyes available I would be reading a paper book. this is like listening to a comic book. absolutely worthless.

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Idealistic, provocative and preachy

Listened to it twice just to really get the hang it. Idealistic, provocative and preachy. Will follow the movement, not yet a fan.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

An economic manifesto for the 21st century

Kate raworthths criticism of modern mainstream economics is much needed as it not only bring out the problems we have in the current metrics that are being used but also suggests policies to move forward. based on contemporary research from not only economics, but also social sciences as well as the latest developments in technology, the book presents a new comprehensive model to evaluate economic activities. The book is written in a way that is enjoyable to read and does not need a specific degree to understand as it's based on a ground-up approach where practical solutions to very real and urgent problems are at the forefront. a glimmer of hope and inspiration!

Fresh and fine

Nice and novel thoughts that come in handy while facing the future and current challenges.

Fatally Conceited

This book is written by an activist, not an empirical observer of reality. It's well researched at times, but the author often gets lost in her own righteousness. It's is somewhat a nice counterbalance to anyone that's gone down the libertarian rabbits hole, but this book doesn't really address the stronger points that Hayek et al raises, simply dismisses them and moves on. The book assumes policy can overtly control the economy from the top down. Hayek describes this as the fatal conceit. An overestimation of ones control over their complex environment.

A must read for anyone interested in sustainability

A wonderful review of economic thinking and where it all went wrong. Puts economics in a new light, helping to reader to see how new economic thinking can be part of the solution. Made me eager to want to learn more.

Babbling, babbling...

This book is just another attempt to rationalize collective over individual. If Piketty cobered his attack with enormous load of data, graphs and calculations, this one tells us the same story in poetic language.
Poetic? Not really. Babbling of this book is tiresome, not poetic. There is one simple story repeated on and on: humans (collective) are destroying Earth. For that reason we should act more responsible, meaning, we should abandon market economy and enter dougnut economy model. And what is this model? Sorry, I cannot tell. Why. Because apart from babbling around responsibiliy, Kate tells us nothing.
To make this critics of the book short (and I am really pissed off being persuadad that I should read this novel aproach to economy): should you want to get some novel views on responsible economy, check Integrated Reporting Council activities (https://integratedreporting.org/). If you want to understand that contemporary liberalism in support to free market does not rely on human as rational being, read von Mises Human action. If you want to believe that free market caused crysis in 2008, bear in mind that it was caused mainly by banks heavilly regulated by the state (USA), same state that rested and still rests on inflationatory monetary policy.
I am appauled by the apparent success of this book and dougnut model. If governments really follow this pile of nothingness, then we are in deep trouble.
Last but not reast. System theory is mentioned couple of times. Ms. Raworth does not know S from System theory. It is an offence to Forrester, Senge and alike to use this term in her context.