Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
Avis de l'équipe
Barr McClellan was a former partner at a law firm run by Edward Clark, who also served as Lyndon B. Johnson's lawyer. In Blood, Money, and Power, McClellan adds to the conspiracy theories surrounding the death of John F. Kennedy by pointing the finger at Johnson, who he claims was aided in the cover-up by Clark. David Drummond has a clinical style that recalls a broadcaster or documentarian, which aims to lend gravity to McClellan's bold assertions, and listeners intrigued by the conspiracies surrounding JFK's death will see Blood, Money, and Power as more evidence in the unending speculation.
An insider’s look at America’s greatest unsolved mystery.
Blood, Money, & Power exposes the secret, high-level conspiracy in Texas that led to President John F. Kennedy’s death and the succession of Lyndon B. Johnson as president in 1963. Attorney Barr McClellan, a former member of L.B.J.’s legal team, uses hundreds of newly released documents, including insider interviews, court papers, and the Warren Commission, to illuminate the maneuvers, payoffs, and power plays that revolved around the assassination of Kennedy and to expose L.B.J.’s involvement in the murder plot.
In addition to revealing new information, McClellan answers common questions surrounding the assassination of our 35th president. Who had the opportunity, motive, and means to assassinate J.F.K.? Who controlled the investigation and findings of the Warren Commission? This historically significant book is proof that absolute power, money, blood, corruption, and deception were at the heart of politics in the early 1960s, and it represents the very best investigative journalism has to offer.
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Blood, Money, and Power
Commentaires - Veuillez sélectionner les onglets ci-dessous pour changer la provenance des commentaires.
The Closest We'll Get to a Texas Insider's Version
I suspect this is a book better read than listened to. In the Audible version the choppy, repetitive, disorganized aspects are very evident. This is partly because McClellan is more concerned with emphasizing central points than with providing a smooth-flowing narrative. The choppiness may also be due to a lawyer's cautiousness. If hazarding a guess, he tells you he's offering a possible theory; if constructing a persuasive brief, he reiterates the key events and background details to refresh our memory and keep us focused.
McClellan ties his themes together with dressy literary elements (epigraphs that open and close each chapter) but these are designed to work on the printed page, not in audio, where they trip up the listener like bollards in the pavement.
The latter part of the book is pure autobiographical narrative and flows smoothly. No plausible guesswork here; it's a true recollection and the best part of the book. McClellan worked for LBJ crony Edward Aubrey Clark in the Austin law firm that bought politicians, engaged hit men, and looked to profit enormously once they had Johnson in the White House.
2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile
3stars not due to the content
Not the right narrator for this book. Book did get a little repetitive at the, but very eye opening and informative. Ken Burns basically confirms his involvement in his serious the Vietnam War
- Jason K. Woodburn
I anticipated getting this book after seeing Barr's segment on the banned episode of the History Channel's "The Men Who Killed Kennedy".
I was disappointed in the end because of McClellen's speculation on what took place in key events in the assassination. I too dislike that he unveiled great info on Lyndon Johnson but used so much of the tired and false story of Lee Oswald found in hundreds of books.
Example: it is convincingly laid out that Mac Wallace was a long-standing hit man for Johnson and Ed Clark, but he then places Oswald right beside Wallace in the snipers nest. Some may argue my point, but Oswald was present in Dallas to break up an assassination attempt.
There is simply little proof here and taking the author's word for it doesn't work for me. The Johnson info is revelatory and the only redeeming quality overall. As a point of view, it earns two stars.
2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile