Send us a text

In this episode, host Reagan Faulkner examines the generational divide within the Democratic Party and the emergence of young progressive leaders challenging the establishment. While the Republican Party has successfully energized young conservatives through figures like Charlie Kirk, Brian Holohan, Brett Cooper, and Candace Owens, the Democratic Party has remained dominated by aging politicians—Joe Biden served nearly 50 years, Bernie Sanders approaching 20 years, Chuck Schumer 44 years, and Nancy Pelosi 38 years before her recent retirement announcement. Reagan explores the candidacy of Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC's former chief of staff, who is now running for Pelosi's San Francisco congressional seat with a radical vision to "rebrand" the Democratic Party by recruiting 400 "insurgents" to run for Congress under a unified progressive agenda designed to disrupt the legislative process.

Chakrabarti's campaign, along with figures like New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, represents a far-left movement that Reagan argues goes beyond traditional Democratic values into socialist territory. Their platforms include nationalizing Amazon Web Services, establishing free government-run grocery stores, rent freezing, and targeting wealthy individuals for taxation—policies that Reagan contends will disincentivize hard work and burden taxpayers. She highlights Chakrabarti's own statements about wanting to "stop playing by the rules" and "move fast and break things" in Congress, treating the legislative process like a Silicon Valley experiment rather than the stable governance America needs during times of economic uncertainty and international conflict.

Reagan issues a call to action for young conservatives, warning that the 2026 and 2028 elections will determine whether America maintains its constitutional republic or slides toward socialism. She challenges Gen Z conservatives to move beyond being the "silent majority" and actively engage in campaigns, volunteer work, and door-knocking to counter what she describes as "left-wing authoritarians" who promote policies that would undermine capitalism, family values, and the American way of life. The future of the Democratic Party—whether it remains a traditional party focused on climate, labor, and civil rights, or transforms into a radical progressive movement—will be decided by upcoming primaries like the one in San Francisco, with consequences that will shape American politics for generations to come.

Send us a text

Episode 5 of The Reagan Faulkner Show titled "Romanticizing Crime," spotlights host Reagan Faulkner's sharp, insightful take on a cultural trend of glamorizing criminal behavior. Aimed at conservative college students and young adults, the episode dissects how movies, social media, and mainstream news sometimes frame lawbreakers as misunderstood heroes or rebels, fueling a dangerous disconnect between popular culture and reality. Faulkner draws listeners in with relatable stories and current examples, encouraging them to question the subtle ways entertainment and society reshape our collective attitudes toward crime.

Throughout the episode, Reagan Faulkner challenges her audience to confront the ethical consequences of celebrating antiheroes and criminal lifestyles. She explores how this romanticization distorts young people's views of justice, safety, and personal accountability. Using thoughtful commentary and real-world parallels, Faulkner illustrates the risks of normalizing—or even idolizing—criminal acts, especially in college environments where impressionable minds are still forming core values.

Faulkner’s engaging, conversational style invites listeners to reflect on the broader impact of these narratives within their own communities. She empowers conservative students to resist peer pressure and mainstream messaging that downplays the seriousness of crime. The episode concludes with a call to action: to champion a culture that values integrity, upholds the rule of law, and actively resists the allure of sensationalized lawlessness. Whether you're on campus or beyond, Episode 5 offers an urgent, thought-provoking perspective on defending truth and personal responsibility in today’s fast-changing world.

Send us a text

In Episode 4: "No Kings" of her podcast, Reagan Faulkner takes a critical and often skeptical look at the recent "No Kings" protest movement spreading across the U.S. Rather than joining in the enthusiasm of protestors rallying against supposed authoritarian threats, she scrutinizes their messaging, motivations, and the accuracy of their grievances. Faulkner opens the episode by questioning whether the movement’s rhetoric—invoking fears of kingship and tyranny—truly reflects political reality, or if it amounts to political theatre driven more by social media trends than by genuine threats to American democracy.

Faulkner dissects the core arguments put forth by "No Kings" supporters, noting inconsistencies and what she sees as overstatements in their claims of creeping autocracy. She interviews both participants and critics of the protests, highlighting how much of the movement’s energy appears rooted in dissatisfaction with the current administration, but she argues that such activism sometimes devolves into hyperbole or even hostility without a constructive agenda. Faulkner is especially pointed in her analysis of the performative aspects of recent rallies, calling attention to incidents where protestors’ conduct contradicted their calls for civility and order.

In her concluding reflections, Faulkner warns listeners against accepting protest messaging at face value and encourages deeper critical thinking about both current events and the lessons of U.S. history. She argues that honoring America’s tradition of rejecting monarchy means more than just chanting slogans—it requires responsible citizenship and respect for institutional checks and balances. Reaffirming her commitment to open debate and civil society, Faulkner invites her audience to engage with skepticism, urging them not to be swept up by crowd mentality or narratives that oversimplify complex political realities.