28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026)

Episode Summary:
In this episode, Michael and Dave dissect 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, the most visually ambitious and thematically rich installment in the iconic 28 Days Later franchise. They explore the film's eerie cult narrative, psychological undercurrents, and the shifting horror dynamics that turn humans into the real monsters. With Nia DaCosta in the director's chair and Alex Garland returning as writer, the film blends horror, satire, and surprising moments of hope. A rich conversation for fans of speculative horror and social allegory.

• Director: Nia DaCosta (Candyman, The Marvels, Little Woods)

• Writer: Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Annihilation, Men, 28 Days Later)

• Cinematographer: Sean Bobbitt (12 Years a Slave, Widows, Hunger)

• Key Cast:

  • Ralph Fiennes as Dr. Ian Kelson – a monument builder and reluctant scientist

  • Alfie Williams as Spike – a returning survivor struggling with identity

  • Jack O'Connell as Jimmy Crystal – the chilling, charismatic cult leader

  • Chai Lewis-Perry as Samson – a towering infected in the midst of transformation

• The Jimmies as Symbol & Horror:
  The gang discusses how the Jimmies reflect societal decay, inspired by the real-life figure of Jimmy Savile. Their cultish behavior and unflinching cruelty mirror deeper fears about manipulation, lost innocence, and the rot at the core of community leadership.

• Samson's Redemption Arc:
  A standout element of the film, Samson's transformation from infected monster to near-human symbolizes the potential for recovery even in corrupted bodies and minds. His scenes with Dr. Kelson evoke tenderness, contrast with the Jimmies' savagery, and challenge the notion of what makes someone "monstrous."

• Human Evil vs. Infected Violence:
  The conversation explores how the infected, though dangerous, follow instinct—while the Jimmies choose cruelty. This blurs the line between traditional "monster" narratives and moral horror, echoing themes from Lord of the Flies and The Road.

• Visual Juxtaposition of Horror and Beauty:
  Bone temples, lush landscapes, and surreal moments (like cloud-gazing while high) create a strange harmony. These sequences ask whether beauty can exist in a world of collapse and whether healing is possible amid trauma.

• Cultural Legacy & Genre Evolution:
  Dave and Michael reflect on how the 28 franchise redefined the zombie genre, and how Bone Temple may mark a new phase—one that values emotional depth and psychological horror as much as jump scares.

Mentioned in this Episode:

• Films: Candyman (2021), Widows, Red Dragon, Gangs of London, Deluge (1933)

• Cultural Figures: Jimmy Savile, Mr. Rogers

• Literary/Genre References: Lord of the Flies, The Walking Dead, Mad Max, Godzilla

Connect with Us:
Website: https://mindframesfilm.com

• Title: Looking to 2026: The Future of Cinema

• Focus: Industry trends, cultural anxieties, and the most anticipated films of 2026

• IMDb: N/A (discussion episode)

In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and David look ahead to 2026 and ask a deceptively simple question: what kind of year will it be for movies? Coming off what they consider a creatively rich—but commercially uneven—2025, the conversation explores the tension between artistic vitality and economic uncertainty. From box office struggles and bloated marketing budgets to shifting audience habits and global cinema's rising influence, the hosts balance cautious concern with genuine excitement for what's coming next.

Theme 1 – Cinema Thriving Creatively, Struggling Economically
While 2025 delivered exceptional films and performances, many acclaimed movies failed to connect with large audiences. The episode interrogates whether this gap reflects streaming habits, rising costs, marketing excess, or deeper cultural fatigue with the theatrical model.

Theme 2 – Event Movies vs. Personal Cinema
The hosts contrast massive IP-driven releases (Avengers: Doomsday, Dune: Part Three, Toy Story 5) with filmmaker-driven projects from auteurs like Nolan, Villeneuve, Gerwig, Eggers, Spielberg, and Iñárritu—questioning whether spectacle alone can sustain moviegoing culture.

Theme 3 – Hope Through Global & Generational Shifts
Despite storm clouds, there are signs of renewal: Gen Z showing renewed interest in theaters, international films breaking through, and genre cinema thriving on modest budgets. The episode argues that cinema isn't dying—it's recalibrating.

• Michael Cockerill

• David Canfield

• 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com

• 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Film

• 🎧 Now Playing Network

• ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com

Best Films of 2025 — Trends, Themes, and the State of Cinema

This is a multi‑film recap episode.

Primary Shared Films Discussed:

• Weapons

• Eddington

• Hamnet

• Sinners

• One Battle After Another

• Train Dreams

• Universal Language

• Frankenstein

Additional Films Referenced:

• It Was Just an Accident

• Ebony and Ivory

• Sirât

• The Zone of Interest

• Everything Everywhere All at Once

• Avatar: Fire and Ash

In this year‑end episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and David Canfield look back on what they agree was one of the strongest years in cinema in recent memory. Rather than ranking films strictly by quality, the discussion centers on how 2025's movies reflected the emotional, cultural, and political realities of the moment. The hosts explore major technical trends—such as the return of controlled formalism, the renewed importance of sound design, and a more disciplined use of CGI—before turning to deeper thematic currents running through the year's films. Across genres, 2025 cinema repeatedly grappled with loss, systemic failure, alienation, and the fragile possibility of hope. The episode concludes with personal picks, shared favorites, and a defense of films that dared to resist cynicism through human connection and formal craft.

Many of the standout films of 2025 rejected frenetic camera work in favor of classical composition—locked‑off shots, wide frames, symmetry, and negative space. This stylistic restraint allowed emotion to emerge gradually rather than being chased by the camera. Films like Hamnet exemplified how formal discipline can deepen emotional resonance and restore cinematic patience.

Sound design emerged as a dominant expressive tool, often prioritizing diegetic and off‑screen audio over traditional sweeping scores. Silence itself became a source of tension, especially in horror, where absence of sound replaced musical cues. This trend reflects both creative evolution and the challenge of balancing theatrical sound design with home viewing habits.

Across genres, filmmakers returned obsessively to stories of missing or dead children, institutional collapse, and moral ambiguity. These narratives frame despair as a defining emotional condition of the era, while asking whether hope can survive systemic pressure. Some films embraced the darkness; others, like Universal Language, quietly resisted it through small acts of human connection.

• Michael Cockerill

• David Canfield

• 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com

• 📘 Facebook

• 🎧 Now Playing Network

• ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com

Mindframes is a sometimes half‑assed but always wholehearted conversation about film, culture, and the moments that shape us.