Is Mark 16:9–20 Original? | Part Two: The Evidence (with James Snapp Jr.)
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
Is Mark 16:9–20 Original? | Part Two: The Evidence (with James Snapp Jr.)
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de cette écoute
In this follow-up episode, I’m joined again by New Testament scholar James Snapp Jr.—and this time, we go deep. If Part One was focused on responding to Wes Huff’s video arguing against the long ending of Mark, Part Two is all about the positive case.
Snapp walks us through a wide range of evidence supporting the authenticity of Mark 16:9–20, including:
-
Greek manuscript data
-
Patristic citations
-
Internal consistency with Mark’s style
-
And why it absolutely deserves to be in your Bible
This episode includes detailed analysis, historical context, and even references to the slides presented in the YouTube version.
👉 Haven’t heard Part One yet? Start here: https://youtu.be/vcrUof_liVg
Explore more from James Snapp Jr.: • Main site: https://jamessnappjr.com/ • Textual criticism blog: https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/
Support the podcast + grab the new Michael Heiser tribute shirt: https://charismatic-cheetah.printify.me/
Be sure to follow, share, and leave a review if this episode helped you see the long ending of Mark in a new light!
#Mark16 #TextualCriticism #JamesSnapp #BiblePodcast #LongEndingOfMark #BiblicalManuscripts #NewTestament #WesHuff #CharismaticCheetah #MichaelHeiser
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !