Federalist 83: “Rules of Commonsense, Adopted by the Courts in the Construction of the Laws” | Hamilton on Juries and on the Interpretation of Law
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
Federalist 83: “Rules of Commonsense, Adopted by the Courts in the Construction of the Laws” | Hamilton on Juries and on the Interpretation of Law
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de cette écoute
We typically organize these podcasts around three big ideas from the essay under review – here are three big ideas from Federalist 83.
Big idea one: In Federalist 83, Hamilton described and sought to refute a claim that the Constitution would eliminate trial by jury in civil cases.
Big idea two: Hamilton argued in Federalist 83 that jury trials in civil cases were important for the sake of property, but not necessarily important for the sake of liberty
Big idea three: In Federalist 83 Hamilton offered commentary on the use of juries in specific instances that shed light on more general ideas about juries.
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
Aucun commentaire pour le moment