Couverture de Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod

De : CCK Law
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de cette écoute

 Hosts Amy Odom, attorney at Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, and Amy Kretkowski, attorney at The Law Office of Amy B. Kretkowski, delve into the most important recent cases in veterans law coming out of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. As experienced VA disability lawyers, Amy and Amy offer listeners careful analyses of these cases and provide insights into their potential impacts on VA law.CCK Law Politique et gouvernement Sciences politiques
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Épisodes
    • Boehringer v. Collins: Can Supplemental Claims Trigger Continuous Pursuit?

      Boehringer v. Collins: Can Supplemental Claims Trigger Continuous Pursuit?
      Jul 18 2025

      In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski analyze Boehringer v. Collins, a case testing whether a veteran can trigger AMA’s continuous pursuit rules by filing a supplemental claim within a year of a legacy Board decision. They break down the statutory argument under Section 2(x) of the AMA, the government’s position on finality, and the broader implications for effective dates in a dual-system world. A must-listen for those tracking how AMA and legacy rules intersect.

      For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      24 min
    • Deal v. Collins Analysis: Revisiting Effective Dates and Pending Claims

      Deal v. Collins Analysis: Revisiting Effective Dates and Pending Claims
      Jun 10 2025
      In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowsi return from hiatus to unpack Deal v. Collins, a Federal Circuit case that challenges the reach of 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(b). They explore the history and implications of legacy regulations on effective dates, dissect arguments presented by both sides, and consider how this case could shape the future of pending claim doctrine. They also discuss its potential impact on other cases. Tune in to learn more!

      For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      24 min
    • Bufkin v. McDonough: Oral Argument Analysis

      Bufkin v. McDonough: Oral Argument Analysis
      Dec 10 2024
      In this episode of Arguendo: The Veterans Law Podcast, Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski discuss the Supreme Court's October 16, 2024, oral arguments in Bufkin v. McDonough. The case centers on the interpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1) and the scope of review that the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must apply regarding the VA's benefit of the doubt rule. Get as the hosts analyze key points raised by advocates and justices, from the standard of review to Congress's intent behind the statute.

      For more information, visit our websites at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠cck-law.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and abkveteranslaw.com
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      42 min
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment