Couverture de Weapons of Math Destruction

Weapons of Math Destruction

How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy

 Aperçu
Offre à durée limitée

3 mois d'Audible Standard gratuits

3 mois pour 0,00 €/mois, puis 5,99 €/mois. Possibilité de résilier chaque mois.
Essayez pour 0,00 €/mois
L'offre prend fin le 15 Juillet 2026 à 23 h 59.
Plus d'options d'achat

Weapons of Math Destruction

De : Cathy O'Neil
Lu par : Cathy O'Neil
Essayez pour 0,00 €/mois

3 mois pour 0,99 €/mois, puis 5,99 €/mois. Possibilité de résilier chaque mois. Offre valable jusqu'au 15 juillet 2026 à 23 h 59.

Acheter pour 15,48 €

Acheter pour 15,48 €

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • A former Wall Street quant sounds the alarm on Big Data and the mathematical models that threaten to rip apart our social fabric—with a new afterword

“A manual for the twenty-first-century citizen . . . relevant and urgent.”—Financial Times

NATIONAL BOOK AWARD LONGLIST • NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY The New York Times Book Review • The Boston Globe • Wired • Fortune • Kirkus Reviews • The Guardian • Nature • On Point

We live in the age of the algorithm. Increasingly, the decisions that affect our lives—where we go to school, whether we can get a job or a loan, how much we pay for health insurance—are being made not by humans, but by machines. In theory, this should lead to greater fairness: Everyone is judged according to the same rules.

But as mathematician and data scientist Cathy O’Neil reveals, the mathematical models being used today are unregulated and uncontestable, even when they’re wrong. Most troubling, they reinforce discrimination—propping up the lucky, punishing the downtrodden, and undermining our democracy in the process. Welcome to the dark side of Big Data. Economie Politique et gouvernement Politique publique Sciences sociales
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Tout
Le plus pertinent
the writer has a good knowledge of the topic. She could have made a thorough an interesting analysis of it. however she ends up being highly biased and presents opinion rather than analysis. there there is no balance nor any counter argument presented.

interesting topic highly prejudiced analysis

Une erreur s'est produite. Réessayez dans quelques minutes.