Votre titre Audible gratuit

The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States

Lu par : Neil Hellegers
Durée : 6 h et 54 min

9,95 € / mois après 30 jours. Résiliable à tout moment.

ou
Dans le panier

Description

The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States is an exciting piece of "speculative fiction." The novel posits that there was a nuclear attack against the US on March 21, 2020 by North Korea, and that a national bipartisan commission was created to investigate what and how it happened. It's pretty scary stuff.

©2018 Jeffrey Lewis (P)2018 HighBridge, a division of Recorded Books

Ce que les membres d'Audible en pensent

Il n'y a pas encore de critique disponible pour ce titre.
Trier par :
Trier par:
  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Amanda B.
  • Amanda B.
  • 25/02/2019

Disturbingly plausible, What Ifs are always open.

If you like Arms Control Wonk, this fiction story from the podcast founder is sure to satisfy. Read well with steady voice acting that didnt mock or drop to impersonation of Trump. Freaky story the was disturbingly plausible, somewhat predictable (as it would be for most ACW listeners) but supremely enjoyable. I appreciated the build up, starting with an accident and ending with
...well, read it yourself!

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Just reading
  • Just reading
  • 08/12/2018

Interesting story

Thought-provoking, great delivery by the narrator. While some may be put off by the politics, it asks a pointed question about nuclear weapons that is as relevant today as when they were invented. Recommended.

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour David P. Goode
  • David P. Goode
  • 02/05/2019

Powerful read!

Very powerful book. Well written. Terrifying largely due to it's realism. Must read for those interested in US foreign policy, particularly as it relates to the Korean peninsula.

2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Alan
  • Alan
  • 20/10/2018

What a book!

A very plausible “what if” fiction story. For all Americans who think it cannot happen here this is a cold shower wake up call. Sooner or later some country or organization will commit this atrocity and then it will be too late.

5 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour brian
  • brian
  • 16/10/2018

Speculation, but, well done.

A look at a likely event to happen in the future. Well researched for a fictional war.

6 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Heatherh
  • Heatherh
  • 21/08/2019

The anti-technothriller

Most of the critiques I have of the book are already covered by other reviews (The book starts off strong, then loses its way after the missiles start flying; shallow Trump bashing that distracts from the narrative (which is a much stronger attack on the man than recounting him yelling at an aide).
I grew up reading Technothrillers (Clancy published The Hunt from Red October when I was in high school and I bought the follow on books for the next several years in hardcover) and so this book appealed to me as a way to scratch that itch. Here's a worst case scenario acted out. Coming from that angle it was striking how much this book was the polar opposite of a Clancy treatment. The perspective of the soldiers involved in this conflict get very few speaking parts. Military personnel are chess pieces. No one cares what the Rook thinks about what's going on and likewise the author doesn't bother with their stories. Another Clancy fascination, the Secret Service, basically does not exist in this world (a military aide gets in a physical confrontation with the president in a pretty tense moment and no secret service agent is even recorded raising an eyebrow). There's a brief discussion of the Chief of Staff contemplating ordering the Secret Service to bodily load the President on Air Force One but the agents apparently have no agency of their own. The State Department is populated by geniuses and people who carry guns are nonentities, like I said basically the polar opposite of the lense Clancy would view this series of events through, I think that may be some of the disappointment people feel about the book is it seems from the Premise like it would scratch that technothriller itch but it very much does not.
The place where the Trump Bashing got a little tedious for me was the author's incredible fascination with the President's difficulty accepting that his wife was dead. Of all the times when you would cut a person some slack for a bit of denial that's on top of the list. Not to mention there's a lot going on at the moment but instead we're hanging out in a bunker while junior staffers debate who's going to tell the President there's no chance Melania survived.
It's a five star buildup and two star denouement. The discussion of intelligence failures and understandable errors leading up to the crisis really is top notch, but the rest of the book is a disappointment.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour DJ W.
  • DJ W.
  • 08/04/2019

A terrifying look at a possible future.

The author obviously knowledgeable about nuclear proliferation , military and political realities of the US AND Korean government. He uses this knowledge to tell write a cautionary tale of the possibilities of a nuclear event. He uses the real names of key government officials and does a good job of political profiling their likely actions and personalities. I read about 40 nonfiction books a year on policy and this work of fiction will stand out. I enjoyed it.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    1 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Bret Spencer
  • Bret Spencer
  • 22/01/2020

Too much BS in what could have been compelling

This is not William R. Forstchen or Tom Clancy's material here. It's more about bashing Trump than a story about the DPRK. It's a shame because it could have been a much better story. Plus, despite its title, it's not even remotely written like a 'commission' report would be. Better to go read an actual commission report like the one referred too in Ted Koppel's Light's Out book researching the EMP threat.

The story which has many plausible elements is just littered with unnecessary and petty nonsense that makes you just want to scream.

I thought the narration was top notch on this story though, That's probably what kept me from just stopping halfway through and skipping to another book. This is one of only a couple of Audible titles I regret purchasing. I was hoping for so much more.

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour James
  • James
  • 12/09/2019

Fascinating, Distrubring, and Flawed

Some positives and negatives with this one:

As others have stated, this story is strongest at the beginning, setting the table for the chaos to unfold. With slight exception from some emotional actions on the part of S Korea’s leadership, it comes off as quite believable and disturbing, but again, loses steam as we progress to 2nd and 3rd acts. Nonetheless, the authors’ apparent goal to convey just how much of a powder keg the Korean Peninsula is, and how horrible the outcome would be in a worst-case scenario, is largely achieved. There are some things that miss the mark for me however, and detracted from the book (spoilers below):

• The idea that there would be no nuclear response from S Korea, Japan, or the US are an NK first strike seems a bit of a stretch to say the least.
• The US military apparently has no “response plan” to an NK nuclear strike, and has to modify a “first strike” plan instead? Doubt it.
• The author needlessly chooses to engage in some #Resistance “fan faction” that is completely unnecessary to the narrative, and really detracts from the story. Trump’s tweeting helping to spiral a situation out of control? Certainly reasonable. Donald Trump getting physically roughed up by a military aide in a literal tug-of-war over the nuclear football? C’mon. Nikki Haley refusing to call Trump in the middle of the night because of rumors of an affair fueled by Michael Wolff’s book? Nikki Haley refusing to give water to a famished child fleeing destruction? Completely pointless. These aspects almost certainly will be gleefully inhaled by passionate Trump opponents, will outrage Team MAGA, but for the rest of us just interested in this topic, really just doesn't add anything.

In sum, in many ways, this story “delivers the goods”, but it’s very avoidable flaws can be quite frustrating.

  • Global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Interprétation
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
Image de profile pour Mark Baker
  • Mark Baker
  • 15/08/2019

Just “ok”

It’s an interesting idea that could have been really good… Somehow it got lost along the way… A solid “OK”