A Great look into Suleiman The Magnificent & the Ottoman Empire

I liked the detailed information regarding the Sultan’s diary. However, I felt like there are some discrepancies from what I’ve researched over my years in studying Suleiman & The Ottomans. His wife, Hurrem- Roxelana- had another son before selim II. HE died around age 20 in Manisa- after Şehzade Mustafa had already ruled that Sanjak (province). mustafa’s mother OUTLIVED everyone... proven by the payments that Selim II gave to her after he became Sultan. While she was called Gülbahar- she was known as Mahidevren.
The details of the campaigns were very important & intriguing. I do think the Battle Of Mojacs could have been shown as one of the quickest & most decisive victories in this story. Instead, it seems like the author was set on proving Suleiman as a man who wasn’t a warrior. 13 campaigns ... equivalent to about 10 yrs in the saddle of his 46 yr reign says A LOT about how strong he truly was! I believe he was a man of contradictions... strong yet loving. Could overlook some things but read too much into one’s actions or inactions.
He was ahead of his time in the belief of variety making an empire /country great. Shown through his lesson to Rustem Pasha - A gardening table filled with flowers of all types & colors. Then, when the varied types-colors taken away & only ONE color of flowers remained he asked Rustem which was better ?
I’ve travelled to Istanbul & seen the magnificent Sulleymane Mosque, courtyard & Turbe (mausoleums Of Suleiman & Hurrem). I’m a Christian & from America but have been captivated by the city on the Bosphorus.... it’s also a place of contradictions-just like Suleiman. East meets west. New & old.
Suleiman’s mosque is breathtaking! I must say it’s more so than the Blue mosque built ~50 yrs later. However, nothing can compare to the Hagia Sophia (Aya Sofia- Church Of Divine Wisdom- Not translated as Saint Sophia)
I think a reading of one of Suleiman’s surviving love poems would’ve added to the weight of his love for her. “Throne of my lonely niche... It’s why he couldn’t see her scheming. Although, I don’t blame her for planning & trying to protect her sons Bc the Ottoman law of fratricide was expected at that time. The idea that it would prevent civil wars / throne fighting holds some weight of you compare what happened in other kingdoms (case in point... the war of the roses in England before the House of Tudor was established that lasted many years and thousands upon thousands died).
I think Suleiman feared becoming his father or letting his anger take over. Every monarch or high leader has this type of battle within himself. It’s the age old story of the lonely king. Suleiman’s wisdom for understanding the Empire’s strategic reach has been understated. Theoretically-Nay- factually- the army couldn’t travel much further than it did -unless a permanent “second capital” was built for wintering the troops. However this would’ve caused a split & divide within the empire. Constantinople-Istanbul-the Payitat (capital city) would be without it’s sultan.
The idea of using slaves to produce princes /Şehzade’s for the empire was a good idea on paper. One concubine mother to one prince was the rule until Hurrem had more than one son. This changed EVERYTHING. Instead of a mother being fully invested in one son’s ascent to the thrown her love would be divided.
I do fully respect the details of this book & the author for his research. I do want to say that Sinan- the architect was NOT Rustems brother - it was another Sinan- of the era who had some role on the seas. I think the difficulty in tracing roots lies in the idea of no surnames during that era & the difficulty in accurately translating the written ottoman language.
I could write forever about this topic. Overall I want to say that Suleiman was a strong leader & his (and the strong Sultans before him namely Mehmed the conquerer) choices- laws - and victories took many many years to come undone.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

5 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

great book great for history buffs

great for history buffs, not for casual readers. based off of Suleiman's personal laconic diary, court records and historians notes, Harold lamb weaves a detailed record of events from Suleimans coronation to the domination of the Mediterranean to his turbulent family life. beautiful, I recommend it.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

5 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Great Non-Western History

Much of the history most Americans learn is filtered through the lens of western civilization. This is a look at the family responsible for the founding of the Ottoman Empire. The history is focused mostly on the life of Suleiman and his interactions and not at all an integrated history. Nevertheless I enjoyed the non-western perspective of the Ottomans.

I just re-listened to this book after stumbling upon the Turkish TV series about Suleiman.
It was well worth the re-listen.

The narration is clear, but a bit slow and mono-tonal.

I also really liked another non-western history Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Incredible material and performance!

The material was presented as a spellbinding story with an outstanding performance of the narration. Fantastic work!

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Informative and interesting

I enjoyed this history of Suleiman the Magnificent but was not a fan of the narration. The affectation of the reader’s voice reminded me of Ze Frank in a “True Facts “ video that I found it distracting, at least for the first couple hours. I eventually adjusted but I’d have preferred a different narrator.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

Investing but not amazing

I didn't like the reader of the book
maybe too British.

It never engaged me.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

interesting but with errors

some of the stuff conflicts with history in other places, like mahidevran was the name of mistags mother and not gulbahar etc

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !