Insightful and thoroughly researched

I enjoyed this book and learned so much about the early years of the USSR and Stalin’s family. I am always appalled every time I read the numbers of death in Russia from the famine in the 1930 to the number of dead in WWII.

Svetlana grew up in the Kremlin surrounded by adoring relatives, governesses and tutors. Her mother committed suicide when she was 6 years old. Svetlana was born in 1926; she lived through the purges, war and the disappearances of most of her relatives into gulags. Her first love, Aleksey Kaples was sent to a labor camp when Stalin learned of their courtship. Her half brother Yaakov, with whom she was close, died in a German P. O. W. camp after Stalin refused a prisoner of war exchange. I was most interested in Svetlana’s meeting with Winston Churchill when he came to meet with Stalin during WWII. Churchill noted her red hair and told her he had also been a redhead when he was young.

In 1967, fourteen years after Stalin’s death, Svetlana defected to the United States. Her life reads like a clock and dagger suspense spy thriller. She had three children from three of her four failed marriages, published several books, made money and lost it. She moved constantly unable to stay in one place very long. She died at age 85, nearly destitute in Wisconsin under the name of Lana Peters. I found her comments about Putin most interesting and that she thought the United States was most naïve about Russia.

Rosemary Sullivan is an eminent biographer. I enjoyed her biography of Margaret Atwood. The book is well researched, and Sullivan maintains a neutral view of the troubled life of Svetlana. Sullivan allows the reader the freedom of their own interpretation. The book is fairly long at 20 hours; Karen Cass does a good job narrating the story.

8 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

The most famous Soviet defector.

If you could sum up Stalin's Daughter in three words, what would they be?

An excellent biography.

What other book might you compare Stalin's Daughter to and why?

I can think of no comparison to make.

What aspect of Karen Cass’s performance would you have changed?

Having another narrator intirely.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

Poor Svetlana went through so much in her life.

Any additional comments?

None.

5 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

terrible narrator

Would you try another book from Rosemary Sullivan and/or Karen Cass?

I will never listen to Karen Cass again.

How could the performance have been better?

The narrator needs to slow down and enunciate. She mushes words together at a rapid pace, lowers her voice so that words are inaudible, increases the volume and pitch when speaking in character. Really, a quite bad performance.

4 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

most intriguing story

When I tell people about the life of this woman, they ask me if it is fiction. This woman's life traversed so many worlds and eras of history, I don't want to spoil any of it. Absolutely worth a listen/read.

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

A Slowly Disolving Life

This book is made unique by Svetlana’s private letters, interviews with Russian relatives and American acquaintances, opened KGB dossiers, and cooperation from her American daughter. It is an interesting subject not heretofore written about with a lesson that life has trajectories, watch where you’re heading. I’m glad I read it. Sullivan fleshes out Svetlana Alliluyeva (nee Svetlana Josifovna Stalina) so the reader comes to know her. The author makes much use of personal correspondence, some of which isn’t particularly important. Given access to it Sullivan seemed loath not to use it. About mid-point Svetlana’s letters are the forward motion of the book. But, that’s a piddling comment. By and large, Sullivan defines the life-arc of Svetlana the wanderer, emerging from a dark place, the daughter of head dungeon master, chasing contentment the rest of her life at her own and other’s expense. There are moments of sunshine but her story doesn’t end happily. The woman’s potential simply melted away like a tablet in water.

A synopsis: Svetlana’s life was a chase after externals—human, religious, and geographical—to find fulfillment. She lived the classic rich kid syndrome albeit with a fine intellect and no drug use. She was emotionally off-balance, pushed and pulled by whims, having no idea of money’s worth until it was gone. She was what Americans used to call a “flibbertigibbet,” with a Slavic tang Despite her cleverness she was extremely impulsive, often a romantic patsy. She wasn’t loved and cherished as people should be except, perhaps, by her first husband (who she divorced after having a child, then moving on) and her final, American-born daughter. She was never an drinker, never a boorish hag, never a seeker of publicity, but on the contrary was warmhearted, honest, charming. She spoke English, French, German, Georgian and Russian. She wrote English well. She taught literature at Moscow University although she ultimately spurned academics. After she defected she burned through a million-and-a-half dollars from U.S. book deals. She gave much of it away and was pathetically swindled out of the bulk of what remained. Meanwhile, the two children she abandoned in Russia resented her leaving and never re-established warm relationships with her. Svetlana was brought to ground by old age: penniless, living in a series of charity houses in England and the United States. By that time she wore second-hand clothes from thrift shops, used a walker, cooked in a communal kitchen . . . sad, sad, sad. Thank goodness for Social Security checks and her youngest daughter, Olga, for whom she sacrificed to send to private schools. In her last interview in an old folks’ home Svetlana said, “Stalin damaged my life.” But disentangling causes of her fate is more complicated than that. There are strands from her father’s influence, her own impetuous and stubborn personality, the emptiness of immigrant disconnection, and the anti-materialism of Soviet culture; all constellated to produce an outcome. As he approaches her end readers will think to themselves, “Oh no. Svetlana, as smart as you are, why did you make those choices?”

3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Well done story about a complex person.

I started out with a lot of sympathy for Svetlana Stalin but ended up thinking her just a willful person who had to have everything on her own terms. Maybe if she had been required to get a job she wouldn't have had so much time to self obsess.
The author did a really great job pulling this tumultuous life together into a coherent story.

2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Fascinating

aAfascinating, and very well written and superbly narrated account of the life of Stalin's daughter. She was a highly intelligent and complicated person but always likable.

Sometimes difficult to understand, wonderful story

This is a FANTASTIC story, always fascinating and interesting. The reader can get difficult to understand from time to time, but it doesn't detract from the story.

The book is lengthy so it is worth it

Narrator seemed biased in her tone and a little irritating but it is a complicated book and she helped with her tone to clarify details so my assessment is mixed.
Great history lesson interesting perspective on what was happening then.

Her voice!

I thought her beautiful British accent made the story most intriguing . I would recommend this story to anyone interested in history!