The silent revolution in energy has already begun — and it’s measured, not modeled.

In this powerful episode of The Empirical Energy Podcast, host Mark Smith sits down with Robert Kleinberg, physicist, researcher, and former Schlumberger scientist, to explore the truth behind global methane reporting — and how measurement-based verification is reshaping the world’s energy future.

Kleinberg exposes the startling differences between U.S. and Russian methane emission methodologies, showing how emission factors — outdated, estimated reporting tools — distort climate data, global trade, and even geopolitics.

As the world pushes toward verified, empirical energy, this conversation reveals the urgent need for accuracy, transparency, and data integrity across every link in the global energy chain.

This is more than policy — it’s a race for truth in the age of misinformation and market disruption.

💡 Key Takeaways

Emission factors are outdated — the future of energy is empirical measurement.

Russia’s “cleaner” data reveals flaws in global reporting, not environmental success.

Verified data = verified trade. Energy credibility depends on transparency.

Methane accuracy affects not just policy — but global economics and geopolitics.

Collaboration between science, industry, and policy is key to verified progress.

🔔 Join the Empirical Energy Movement

If this episode opened your eyes to the data behind the energy revolution:

✅ Subscribe to The Empirical Energy Podcast for more verified conversations

💬 Comment what you think: Should all energy reporting be measurement-based?

📢 Share this episode — truth in data starts with awareness

Empirical Energy — measured, verified, unstoppable. ⚡🌍