Couverture de Mother, Murder, or Madness

Mother, Murder, or Madness

The Lindsay Clancy Case and How It Will Affect the Future of Women

Extrait de voix virtuelle

Bénéficiez gratuitement de Standard pendant 30 jours

5,99 €/mois après la période d’essai. Annulation possible à tout moment
Essayez pour 0,00 €
Plus d'options d'achat

Mother, Murder, or Madness

De : Enzo Weinberg
Lu par : AI Voice Eve
Essayez pour 0,00 €

Renouvellement automatique à 5,99 €/mois après 30 jours. Annulation possible chaque mois.

Acheter pour 17,99 €

Acheter pour 17,99 €

Offres de saison | 0,99 € par mois pendant les 3 premiers mois

5,99 €/mois par la suite. Des conditions s’appliquent. Annulation mensuelle possible.
Background images

Ce titre utilise une narration à voix virtuelle

La voix virtuelle est une narration générée par ordinateur pour les livres audio.
This audiobook is narrated by an AI Voice.
She was a labor and delivery nurse. She had spent her working life bringing other people's children into the world.

On the afternoon of January 24, 2023, Lindsay Clancy built a snowman with her children in the yard of a house in Duxbury, Massachusetts. She took her five year old daughter to the pediatrician. She ordered dinner. She asked her husband to go pick it up.

He was gone for forty-five minutes.

In the sixteen weeks before that afternoon, four providers prescribed her eleven psychiatric medications. She went to the emergency room four times. She called two crisis hotlines. She admitted herself to McLean Hospital on New Year's Day and was discharged four days later, early, so she could attend her daughter's fifth birthday party.

She did not run. She tried to die, and failed, and has not walked since. Her husband asked the public to forgive her.

This is not a book about whether she did it. Nobody disputes that she did. It is a book about the question that three men and nine women could not answer across thirty hours behind a closed door: whether a mind can be held responsible for itself.

And then the harder question. Not what should happen to her. What happens to every other woman once we decide.

Because both answers lead to the same place. If she was not criminally responsible, then a functional, educated, employed woman can become so impaired she is not accountable, and the response is precaution. If she was responsible, the warning signs were there and society failed to act, and the response is precaution. Different reasoning. Same pressure.

Built from the unsealed warrant file, both civil complaints, and four hundred years of law. It takes no side and refuses to let the listener off the hook.
Sciences sociales Études de genre
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment