Notorious Confirmation of ACB pt. 3

Host: Nii Amaa Ollennu

Guest: Jack Scrantom, Esq.

Justice Barrett stated that “calling a Black employee the N-word does not make for a hostile work environment.” But what did she actually say about the N-Word?

Concluding the 3-part show with guest, Jack Scrantom, Nii touches on the importance of checking his emotions, the benefits of civil discourse, and what he learned in his journey from #triggered to #informed!

NO Niches will be back in January 2021 with more discussions and conversations designed to get listeners out of their lane!

Contact Us –

Instagram: https://podcast.noniches.com/ig

Twitter: https://podcast.noniches.com/twitter

Email: Info@noniches.com

Sources & Additional Information –

ACB Opinion Article: https://podcast.noniches.com/ACBart

Notorious Confirmation of ACB pt. 3

Host: Nii Amaa Ollennu

Guest: Jack Scrantom, Esq.

Headline Read- Justice Barrett stated that “calling a Black employee the N-word does not make for a hostile work environment.” There's no way, right?

In this 3-part show we will learn about guest, Jack Scrantom, Esq., discuss the politicization of federal court nominations, the role, and dynamics of our appellate courts, and we’ll discuss the opinion that formed the basis for the headline that triggered me.

This episode, Jack and Nii discuss the facts of the case, Smith v. Illinois Department of Transportation, and what Justice ACB had actually had to say about the case.  Was her decision reasonable? You be the judge and let us know what you think.

Contact Us –

Instagram: https://podcast.noniches.com/ig

Twitter: https://podcast.noniches.com/twitter

Email: Info@noniches.com

Sources & Additional Information –

ACB Opinion Article: https://podcast.noniches.com/ACBart

Welcome to NO Niches! The objective of this podcast is to combat complacency and bring new value to the lives of those with curious and open minds.

In Notorious Confirmation of ACB, host Nii Amaa Ollennu shares his journey from triggered to informed. In this episode, Jack and Nii discuss dynamics of the appellate courts, the importance of balance, and the politicization of the nomination and confirmation process.

Background:

The US Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. It sets out the limits under which our government can operate. The Constitution does not set forth requirements for place of birth, age, or education or profession of Justices.

Congress and the President are given the power to establish the number of Justices sitting on the Supreme Court, as well as the judges in the other 2 levels of federal court. The 1869 Judiciary Act solidified the number of Justices on that Court at 9 and established a 6 Justice quorum.

Want more information – Check out these sources:

• Constitution
• SCOTUS Qualifications
• 10 Supreme Court Judges?!
• 14 Ways to Interpret the Constitution
• Constitutional Interpretation for Dummies
• Congressional Research – Modes of Constitutional Interpretation

#NONiches #Nichesgetstiches #SCOTUS #JusticeBarrett #NotoriousRBG #GinsburgRule #SenatorJoeBiden #TriggeredtoInformed #StayOutofYourLane #SOYL #Textualist #Originalist #LivingConstitution #USConstitution #ArticleIII