Climate Change Debate: Asking Questions We're Not Supposed to Ask | The Science Isn't Settled
Is questioning climate change science really anti-science? In this episode, I dive into the uncomfortable truths about the climate debate that nobody wants to discuss. From COVID lockdowns to CO2 narratives, we explore why "settled science" has become a conversation-ender instead of a starting point for inquiry.
👀What We Cover:

Why questioning climate science doesn't make you a denier
The financial incentives behind climate narratives
How fossil fuels actually protect us from climate dangers
The human flourishing argument and individual liberty
Following the money in climate policy and research funding
Why comfort and survival are natural human priorities

👀Featured Discussions:

Joe Rogan Experience insights with Richard Lindzen
Mike Rowe's "The Way I Heard It" podcast with Alex Epstein
Historical CO2 levels vs. temperature data
The difference between science as methodology vs. authority

👀Key Questions Explored:
When did asking questions become denying reality? Should we sacrifice quality of life for collective narratives? Who benefits from the current climate change narrative?

👀Referenced Content:
Links to Mike Rowe & Alex Epstein discussion, Joe Rogan clips, and source materials in the comments below.
#ClimateChange #ClimateDebate #FossilFuels #ScienceDebate #CriticalThinking #HumanFlourishing #MikeRowe #AlexEpstein #CO2 #ClimatePolicy #FreeThinking #QuestionEverything #ClimateCrisis #EnergyPolicy #GlobalWarming
Subscribe for more thought-provoking discussions that challenge mainstream narratives!