Fixing Common ERM Challenges
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
New website = RiskCommentary.ca
ERM mid-life crisis: how to rejuvenate and validate the program.
- The curious juxtaposition of need vs poor take-up.
- Steps in analyzing and fixing poor take-up in ERM programs.
- Several specific fixes for improving the compelling nature of risk information.
- What about “opportunity”? Ref: Innovation.
- What about other risk management sub-disciplines?
- Return to first principles in planning and HQRA.
- Review again the principles of program success (Ep 15).
KEY QUOTE
“The result [of High Quality Risk Assessment] is a body of risk information that is fresh and revelatory, leading to problem solving. When that happens at your risk ID session, it is unmistakable. People see the logic of the method and acknowledge that it is working.”
LINKS
Free introductory course: Innovation: How Can My Organization Get Started?
(E. Robertson 2016) Solving the Enterprise Risk Management Puzzle: Secrets to Successful Implementation
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment