Send a text

Start with a misdelivered toy and a retail nightmare, add a barrage of Bad Dragon jokes, and you might expect pure chaos—except the chaos hides sharper questions about taste, ethics, and where creators draw the line. We go from laughing at absurd sponsorship ideas to weighing what it means to attach a show’s identity to adult brands and whether shock value is worth the association.

Then we pivot to movies with a double-take: the clean precision of 1917’s one-shot illusion versus the slower burn of 1922, and a heated breakdown of zombie rules—running vs. shambling, infection vs. undeath, and why the “zombie baby” trope refuses to die. The conversation skewers Australia-as-villain plotlines and asks what national stereotypes add or subtract from a story. It’s loud, it’s irreverent, and it still lands on the craft that makes tension work.

Next comes the anime crossfire. Is anime a medium or a monolith? Do subs and dubs define the experience? Attack on Titan gets treated like a gateway drug and a lightning rod at the same time. We call out the difference between hating a trope and misunderstanding a format, and we admit that recommendations are trust—bad ones can turn viewers off for years. Expect brash takes, reluctant concessions, and a few surprising common grounds.

We close on ownership and infrastructure: streaming’s slide back into cable economics, why physical media still matters, and a practical look at AI’s energy and water footprint. Does water use equal water loss? What even is the “trapped water” theory? We poke at climate claims by following incentives—if oceans are set to swallow the coast, why do the loudest alarmists keep buying beachfronts and securing long mortgages? You don’t have to agree to appreciate the point: make choices with eyes open, and know who profits when platforms rewrite the rules.

Hit play for gallows humor, sharp media takes, and a few spicy rants that might make you yell back at your phone. If you laughed, argued, or reconsidered a favorite, tap follow, share this with a friend, and drop a review telling us the hottest take we got wrong.

Send a text

What do you call the dead who come back not to feast, but to finish what life wouldn’t let them complete? We dive into We Bury The Dead and unravel a story that swaps infection rules for ritual, jump scares for the slow press of guilt, and tidy answers for unnerving questions.

We start with the spark: an experimental U.S. blast off Tasmania that isn’t nuclear but still shatters a city and scrambles what returns. From there, we track Ava’s mission to find her missing husband, and how that search doubles as penance for an affair the film reveals in patient, telling details—the ring on a sink, a face on a badge, a line that lands harder once you think about it. Along the way, we wrestle with the creatures themselves. Are they zombies, ghouls, or something new? The film’s language of “aggravated” rather than “aggressive” sends us down a rabbit hole on behavior, unfinished business, and why some bodies lunge while others just… resume. If Dawn of the Dead critiqued consumption, this story stares at closure, or the lack of it, and dares us to sit with the ache.

Craft gets its due. We praise a visceral blast sequence that sells the wrongness in a single wave, while dinging the copy‑paste look of burning-city VFX. Sound becomes the stealth antagonist—teeth clacks and grinding that gnaw at your nerves and split our panel between admiration and absolute aversion. And yes, we talk performances. Daisy Ridley grounds Ava with a presence that never yanks us out of the frame, proving that “invisible acting” can be the strongest kind when a movie trades spectacle for slow-burn dread. The military thread teases cover‑ups without filing a report, the lore resists neat codex rules, and the ambiguity either invites you in or leaves you cold. We argue both sides, and that friction might be the point.

If you crave clean zombie math, you may bristle. If you’re open to a genre piece that retools the undead into mirrors for grief, guilt, and compulsion, you’ll find ideas worth chewing on—no pun intended. Hit play, then tell us: zombie, ghoul, or a new breed entirely? Subscribe, share with a horror‑loving friend, and drop your take in a review so we can feature it next week.

Send us a text

What happens when you describe The Martian as a “work retreat gone badly” or The Purge as a “civic exercise with rules that fail”? We turned our survival podcast into a high-stakes guessing game built on outrageously bad synopses of movies we’ve covered—Sinners, The Purge, The Day After Tomorrow, Cast Away, The Martian, Outside, 2012, The Thing, Nope, Cargo, and Warm Bodies—and it got competitive fast.

Across the chaos, a clear throughline emerges: survival lives or dies on trust, timing, and adaptation. We dig into why rule-based systems crumble when people stop cooperating, how delay and denial make disasters worse, and where logistics turn into ethics when resources and time run out. From paranoia under pressure in The Thing to spectacle versus safety in Nope, from the quiet burden of responsibility in Cargo to the problem-solving grind of The Martian, we unpack what these stories teach about planning, communication, and staying human when everything else breaks.

We also share which disaster movies still hit—why 2012 feels like wild comfort food, how The Day After Tomorrow works as a climate caution, and what makes Outside and Sinners stick as moral reckonings rather than simple thrills. Plus, we sketch future game mechanics to make the challenge even sharper: timed hints, point-for-hint trades, and progressively worse clues that force faster pattern recognition.

Play along, shout your guesses, and tell us where we blew it. If you love survival strategy, disaster films, zombie lore, and the art of decoding plots under pressure, this one’s for you. Subscribe, share with a friend who swears they’d survive, and drop your movie picks for our next round—we’ll read the best on air.