Why Most Drugs Fail, and Why Virtual Tissue Models Beat Virtual Cell Models
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Naren Tallapragada (co-founder of Tessel) joins to talk about the industry of modeling biology. While the field races to build virtual cell models, his team builds virtual tissue models, betting that predicting what an organ actually does matters more than predicting what genes a cell expresses. The goal: not just whether a drug works, but who it works for.
In this episode, we discuss:
- Why 90% of drugs fail in clinical trials, and why neuro and Alzheimer's failure rates are even worse
- The multi-scale modeling problem: molecules, genes, cells, tissues, organs, and why picking the right level of resolution matters more than picking the "best" one
- The electron-and-lightbulb argument for why virtual cell models may be a beautiful solution to the wrong problem
- Organoids vs. animal models: where human cell models beat animals, and where both fail (like modeling behavior in mental health)
- Why Naren thinks defensibility in AI-driven biology comes from proprietary multi-organ data, not model architecture
- The case for precision medicine, and why it's been such a brutal business model to actually execute on
Credits:
Created by Greg Kubin and Matias Serebrinsky
Host: Matias and Greg
Produced by Nico V. Rey
Find us at businesstrip.fm and psymed.ventures
Follow us on Instagram and Twitter!
Theme music by Dorian Love
Additional Music: Distant Daze by Zack Frank
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment