Why Blake Lively Deserves a Fair Process (Yes, Even Now)
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
We’re back on the Lively v. Baldoni lawsuit—but this time, we’re playing a bit of devil’s advocate.
No matter how wild the facts may look from the outside, Blake Lively still deserves fair process under the law. In this live, we explain what California’s Civil Code Section 47.1 was meant to do, why it's such a big deal in this case, and how it intersects with fundamental due process rights—even for controversial parties.
We're not ignoring the claims or the public perception. We're asking: What does fair process really mean, and how should it apply in a defamation lawsuit like this?
We also walk through some hypothetical examples to show where these protections can help—or go too far.
Real lawyers. Real analysis. And always—your voice in the Jury Pool.
—
Learn more about our law firm: https://www.aldavlaw.com
Follow us on social media: TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aldavlaw Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aldavlaw Twitter: https://twitter.com/aldavlaw
Want to support the channel? Grab merch or tell us which charities you want Super Chat proceeds to go to! https://ask2lawyers-shop.fourthwall.com/
#BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #LegalAnalysis #LivelyvBaldoni #Ask2Lawyers #RealLawyersReact
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !