What the Media Totally Missed on Trump Immunity Appeal
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
What the Media Totally Missed on Trump Immunity Appeal
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Former DOJ prosecutor Alex Grant explains what traditional media sources totally missed about the Supreme Court's decision to take Trump's presidential immunity appeal. He explains that there is another pending Supreme Court appeal that was already holding up the trial in the January 6 case. Alex discusses the work that the Supreme Court is going to have to do to distinguish a 1982 case, Nixon v Fitzgerald, that extended absolute presidential immunity from civil lawsuits. Finally, he talks about how the special counsel's prior tactical decisions made the Supreme Court's decision to accept the appeal virtually a foregone conclusion.
Aucun commentaire pour le moment
