Couverture de Top Secrets Experiments

Top Secrets Experiments

Top Secrets Experiments

De : Creator at Obomedia
Écouter gratuitement

Offres de saison | 0,99 € par mois pendant les 3 premiers mois

5,99 €/mois par la suite. Des conditions s’appliquent. Annulation mensuelle possible.
À propos de ce contenu audio
 Unlock the darkest chapters of human curiosity. Classified Experiments pulls back the curtain on the most infamous and unethical scientific endeavors ever conceived.

From chilling psychological manipulations to bizarre medical trials and secret government projects, we expose the hidden truths behind experiments that pushed the boundaries of ethics and human decency. Discover the shocking stories of forbidden research, the controversial figures who led them, and the forgotten lives forever altered by these audacious undertakings. Classified Experiments is your portal to understanding the moral complexities and lasting impact of science gone rogue.

New episodes arrive daily, every single day of the week, Monday through Sunday, promptly at 4:00 AM. Each installment delivers a meticulously researched deep dive into a single, notorious case, offering a compelling narrative without sensationalism.

This podcast is for anyone fascinated by the dark side of scientific ambition, historical controversies, and the ethical dilemmas that continue to haunt our understanding of progress. If you question authority and seek the truth behind closed doors, you've found your next obsession.

Subscribe to Classified Experiments now and uncover what was never meant to be known.© 2026 OBOMEDIA Creators Science
Épisodes
  • When Saving Lives Meant Letting Others Die: Helsinki's Moral Rift

    When Saving Lives Meant Letting Others Die: Helsinki's Moral Rift
    Oct 28 2026
    When Saving Lives Meant Letting Others Die: Helsinki's Moral Rift

    A single phrase in an eleven-paragraph document shifted consent from "absolutely" to "to the fullest extent possible," letting proxy consent and placebo trials move from rare exceptions into global practice - and by the late 1990s geography alone was deciding who received life-saving treatments. How did a declaration with no legal teeth end up governing experiments that let some women receive a drug that cut mother-to-child HIV transmission by nearly 70% while others got placebo?

    In this episode, we lay out the decisions, clauses, and institutional choices that connected Nuremberg to Helsinki to AIDS trials in the 1990s, and ask whether professional consensus can ethically substitute for law when lives are at stake.

    Person: Twenty-three German physicians
    Date: June 1964
    Document: Declaration of Helsinki (eleven paragraphs)
    Study: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 076 (Zidovudine)
    Result: nearly 70% reduction in mother-to-child HIV transmission

    - Nuremberg Tribunal produced the Nuremberg Code with ten principles in 1947.
    - Helsinki replaced the Nuremberg Code's "absolutely essential" consent with "to the fullest extent possible" in June 1964.
    - The 1975 Tokyo revision of Helsinki introduced independent protocol-review committees and prioritized subjects' interests over science.
    - The 1994 Zidovudine trial (Study 076) showed nearly 70% reduction in maternal HIV transmission.
    - The FDA adopted the 1996 version of Helsinki, allowing placebo where "no proven method existed," while ignoring later revisions.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    21 min
  • The Marshmallow Lie: How One Room Sold Willpower as Destiny

    The Marshmallow Lie: How One Room Sold Willpower as Destiny
    Oct 27 2026
    The Marshmallow Lie: How One Room Sold Willpower as Destiny

    The idea that a fifteen-minute test in a small Stanford room could predict your whole life still grips audiences: the marshmallow parable claimed kids who waited scored about 210 points higher on the SAT and were later rated more competent, but that sweeping lesson was drawn from just fifty children from one privileged nursery-so what did the experiment actually measure, and who did it leave out?

    In this episode, we present the original setup, the follow-up findings, and the overlooked details that changed the meaning of the study; you’ll hear how the room, the tin, and the bell shaped behavior-so was the test measuring innate self-control or something else?

    Person: Walter Mischel
    Date: 1972
    Location: Stanford University (Bing Nursery School)
    Sample size: 50 children (6 excluded from analysis)
    Follow-up year: 1990 (SAT score comparison)

    - The original experiment included children aged 3 years 6 months to 5 years 6 months, with a median age of 4 years 6 months.
    - Fifty children participated in the first sub-experiment; six were excluded from the analysis.
    - High delayers scored on average about 210 points higher on the SAT than low delayers in the 1990 follow-up.
    - The experiment used an opaque cake tin containing one marshmallow and one pretzel stick, with a desk bell on the table as the surrender instrument.
    - A 1970 experiment found that when rewards were visible, children waited less, so the 1972 study deliberately hid the treat to increase waiting.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    20 min
  • The Man Who Flipped 450V: Why Ordinary People Obeyed

    The Man Who Flipped 450V: Why Ordinary People Obeyed
    Oct 26 2026
    The Man Who Flipped 450V: Why Ordinary People Obeyed

    The basement device at Yale had thirty switches rising to 450 volts, and when tested in 1961, 65% of ordinary people delivered the highest shock - yet every participant had passed 300 volts first. What hidden detail discovered in 2012 complicates the story and raises the question: what did Milgram never make public?

    In this episode, we present the original setup, procedure, and startling results of the Yale obedience study, and introduce the later re-examination of the data that challenges the simple reading of those numbers. How does that undisclosed finding change what we thought we knew about obedience?

    Person: Stanley Milgram
    Date: 1961
    Location: Yale University basement
    Event: Obedience to authority experiment with shock generator
    Author: Gina Perry (re-examination in 2012)

    - The shock generator had thirty switches in a horizontal row, increasing in 15-volt increments from 15V to 450V.
    - Final three switches were unlabeled and marked only with "XXX" without voltage descriptions.
    - Fourteen of the first forty subjects laughed nervously during the sessions; Milgram recorded this laughter as distress.
    - Every participant who continued had already delivered at least 300 volts before proceeding further.
    - The experiment included one real 45-volt sample shock administered to the teacher before the session began.

    Tired of ads? Listen to this podcast and 200+ more ad-free on OBOMEDIA.
    Try it free for 7 days, cancel anytime: https://obomedia.com/en/gratis?ref=desc-7194034

    © 2026 Created by an independent creator of the OBOMEDIA Network. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the property of their respective creator, who is solely responsible for them, and are distributed by the OBOMEDIA Network on platforms such as Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and Pocket Casts. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without the creator's prior written permission is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    21 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment