The Real Cost of Vacancy, Part I: Turnover Risk in Multifamily Properties
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Overview
In this episode of the Ironclad Underwriting Podcast, Jason Williams and Frank Patalano examine the true financial impact of vacancy beyond simple underwriting assumptions. They unpack how turnover costs, deferred maintenance, resident behavior, and property class dramatically affect cash flow, timelines, and overall asset performance. This first installment sets the foundation for understanding why vacancy is often far more expensive than it appears on a spreadsheet.
Topics Covered
- Why vacancy assumptions often underestimate real financial exposure
- The true components of turnover costs in multifamily assets
- Differences in turnover risk across Class A, B, and C properties
- How deferred maintenance compounds vacancy duration and expense
- The operational timeline from move out to re lease
- The impact of staffing limitations on vacancy length
- Pest infestations, pet damage, and extreme unit conditions
- When turnover costs shift from operating expenses to capital expenditures
- Why units you cannot access during due diligence often carry the highest risk
Quotes
- “Vacancy is not just lost rent. It is time, labor, capital, and momentum quietly draining from the asset.”
- “The units you cannot get into are usually the ones with the biggest problems, and the biggest costs.”
🎧Connect with Jason
✅ https://IroncladUnderwriting.com
✅Linktree
🎧 Connect with Frank:
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
Aucun commentaire pour le moment