The UK is headed for another energy crisis. The war in Iran has choked energy markets and will be felt as another hit for inflation weary consumers and for the UK's beleagured economy.
What should government do now? And how can it act to make sure that it doesn't waste the crisis?
In this episode of Policy Fix, host Joe Owen sits down with Nesta CEO Ravi Gurumurthy and director of Nesta's sustainable future mission, Madeleine Gabriel to untangle the acute effects of this latest energy shock from more long running challenges in the UK's energy economy.
They explore:

• Why the UK is so exposed to energy shocks
• How this crisis differs from the gas spike caused by the invasion by Russia of Ukraine
• What the government should and shouldn't do to support consumers on rising bills
• How to make electricity cheaper
• What do to about North Sea Oil
• How to run a massive energy saving campaign

If you're interested or work in energy policy, climate change, or economics, this episode is essential listening.
Nesta is a politically impartial research and innovation charity designing, testing, and scaling solutions to society's biggest problems. Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts.

CHAPTERS

00:00 Introduction and teaser

01:11 Welcome and episode overview

02:30 How the war in Iran is affecting energy markets

03:57 Is the UK more exposed than other countries?

04:35 How this crisis compares to the 2022 Ukraine gas spike

07:00 Lessons from 2022: what should government do now?

09:42 When and how should government intervene?

13:05 Supporting households: targeted vs general subsidies

16:27 Turbocharging electrification through the crisis

22:16 Making the electricity-to-gas price ratio work

23:26 How to pay for it all

25:19 The North Sea oil debate

29:17 What households can do for themselves

32:08 The case for a national energy-saving campaign

33:43 The politics of decarbonisation

37:11 Closing thoughts: what should Keir Starmer prioritise?

One in five children aged 3–5 already owns a smartphone and 95% of 13–15 year-olds have a social media profile. Is the UK's Online Safety Act failing to protect them and is a blanket ban on social media the answer?

In this episode of Policy Fix, host Joe Owen sits down with Tony Curzon Price, economist and policy fellow at Nesta, and Hannah Perry, Director at Demos, to untangle one of the most urgent policy debates of our time: how do we regulate social media for children without doing more harm than good?

They explore:

• Why the Online Safety Act has 'barely touched the sides' and what went wrong

• The evidence base for social media harm, from Jonathan Haidt's correlations to natural experiments tracking Facebook's campus rollout

• Why Australia's age-based ban may push kids toward riskier, less regulated spaces

• The case for product regulation - treating social media like a dangerous car that should be made safer, rather than trying to ban driving

• Tony's bold proposal: a BBC Club Kids social network, launched by 2028

• Hannah's vision for community-rooted digital spaces and epistemic sovereignty

• What the government consultation should actually deliver, including bringing AI chatbots inside the scope of the Online Safety Act

If you work in policy, edtech, child welfare, or digital regulation or if you're a parent trying to make sense of a system that feels broken this episode is essential listening. Note that this episode was recorded before the recent judgement against Meta and YouTube in the US.

Nesta is a politically impartial research and innovation charity designing, testing, and scaling solutions to society's biggest problems. Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts.

Episode Chapters

00:00 What’s coming up: "A full-time job for parents": the social media treadmill

01:09 Welcome to Policy Fix. Introducing Joe, Tony Curzon Price & Hannah Perry

02:01 Setting the scene: is this a moral panic, or something genuinely different?

03:43 The stats: 1 in 5 toddlers has a phone; 95% of teens on social media

04:03 Evidence of harm. Child deaths, compulsive scrolling & displaced real-world activity

05:01 The causality debate: what Jonathan Haidt's research actually shows

06:30 The Facebook campus study — a natural experiment pointing to causality

07:33 The willingness-to-pay study: users know they're trapped and want out

08:25 How did we get here? The attention-harvesting business model explained

10:13 The algorithm arms race. Sarah Wynn-Williams and the Facebook whistleblower revelations

11:26 From Father Coughlin to Facebook: what radio history tells us about regulating media

13:23 Why the Online Safety Act has barely touched the sides

15:35 Why has this crisis bubbled back up the agenda now?

17:43 Should we ban social media for children? Tony makes the case against

19:05 The upside of social media why a blanket ban risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater

21:16 Hannah on the ban: 50% of parents would evade it, and it breaks trust with kids

23:34 Are "cuter" regulatory solutions also doomed to fail?

23:50 Tony's alternative: a public service construction of a good platform

26:44 Hannah's vision. BBC charter renewal, epistemic sovereignty & community digital spaces

29:31 What should the BBC practically do in the upcoming charter renewal?

32:26 The wider policy toolkit: no silver bullet, but an array of solutions

34:45 Tony on family-level solutions, network monitoring without surveillance

37:53 Australia's ban evaluation: is it reducing family conflict?

38:22 The BBC's new role in media literacy and cultural norm shift

39:05 What to watch for after the consultation closes

39:27 Hannah's ask: include AI chatbots in the Online Safety Act

40:08 Tony's ask: the BBC must become the platform, not feed it

41:52 One thing for Keir Starmer. Tony on cyberspace experimentation

42:49 Hannah's closing call: strengthen the Online Safety Act with safety-by-design

43:14 Sign-off

Successive governments have promised to reform the British state. Most have left it harder to navigate than they found it. So what would genuinely fixing the way government works actually look like?

In this episode of The Policy Fix, Jill Rutter (Senior Fellow, Institute for Government) and Andrew Greenway (founder of A Bit Digital and former senior civil servant) join host Joe Owen to examine why Whitehall struggles to deliver: the civil service’s misaligned incentives, the gap between policy and delivery, and why Labour’s mission-driven government ran out of steam.

They also explore what the rare successes GDS, the vaccine taskforce, Brexit, Covid actually have in common, and what it would take to replicate that more broadly.

They end with a quickfire question: if Keir Starmer called you tomorrow and said he wanted to move fast and break things, what’s the one thing you’d tell him to break?

Frank, expert and full of practical insight, this is the state reform conversation that Whitehall needs to be having.

The Policy Fix is produced by Nesta.

Timecodes:

00:00:00 Introduction

00:01:53 Do we have a government delivery problem?

00:06:18 What happened to Labour's mission-driven government?

00:12:07 Why do politicians struggle to get things done?

00:15:52 Has governing fundamentally changed?

00:22:12 What the Government Digital Service (GDS) got right

00:27:24 The “project” model: lessons from the Olympics

00:30:23 The policy vs delivery divide in Whitehall

00:34:06 Brexit and Covid: what government can do well

00:39:41 Do we need a wholesale review of the British state?

00:43:15 Structural reform: does No. 10 need more power?

00:48:31 What would you break? The final question