SUCCESSION: Moral forfeiture
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
SUCCESSION: Moral forfeiture
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
CASE: Straede v Eastwood [2003] NSWSC 280
In August 2000, John Straede was driving his wife Cheryl to work. He overtook the car in front of him on a hill and collided with an oncoming vehicle. Cheryl was killed in the accident.
John pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death.
The question in this case was not whether John was guilty of causing Cheryl's death, it was whether he was still entitled to inherit from her estate.
John applied for relief from the forfeiture rule, the rule that states that a person shall not benefit from the death they have caused.
However, the case focused little on the car accident itself and more on the ménage à trois with another woman.
Aucun commentaire pour le moment
