Couverture de Relitigated

Relitigated

Relitigated

De : Relitigated Podcast Team
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de cette écoute

A podcast about real Supreme Court cases. No law degree required.

Join hosts Jarret and Nikki as they re-argue a real Supreme Court case in front of 3 friends role-playing as "justices". Each episode includes an overview of the case, arguments from the hosts, deliberations and opinions issued by our panel of "justices", and finally a reveal of what the real Supreme Court ruled and how their decision impacts us today.

Also, we should mention no one on the show is a lawyer.

Our goal is to present the history and decisions of the Supreme Court in an engaging and accessible way. If you're not a lawyer, that's okay, we aren't either!

2024-2025
Politique et gouvernement Sciences politiques
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Épisodes
    • #15 Berghuis v. Thompkins
      Jul 30 2025

      In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Berghuis v. Thompkins.

      A man is arrested, informed of his rights, and interrogated. But for two hours and 45 minutes of questioning, he is mostly silent. At trial he argued that he was exercising his right to silence under Miranda v. Arizona, and police should have stopped the interrogation. The Appeals Court thought so, too.

      The question before the court: was the Appeals Court correct in its interpretation of the right to remain silent?

      ---

      For complete episode information, check out our episode guide on our website at https://relitigated.com/2025/07/29/15-berghuis-v-thompkins/.

      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      1 h et 39 min
    • #14 North Carolina v. Butler
      Jul 23 2025

      In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case North Carolina v. Butler.

      A man is arrested by the FBI, who gave him both a verbal and written notification of his rights. WB refused to sign a form indicating that he wished to waive his rights. Statements to the agents were included in evidence against him at trial. He was convicted, the North Carolina Supreme Court overturned the conviction, and the State cried foul.

      The question before the court: can a suspect’s statements be used against him if he did not explicitly say he was waiving his Miranda rights?

      ---

      For complete episode information, check out our episode guide on our website at https://relitigated.com/2025/07/23/14-north-carolina-v-butler.

      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      1 h et 16 min
    • #13 Reflections on Buck v. Bell: An Interview with Dr. Paul Lombardo
      Jul 16 2025

      In this episode, we speak with Dr. Paul Lombardo, Regents’ Professor and Bobby Lee Cook Professor of Law at Georgia State University. He is a historian and legal scholar who has written on eugenics, medical ethics, and Buck v. Bell. He tells us about Carrie Buck, those at the Virginia Colony who drove her case to the Supreme Court, and the impact of the Court’s decision.

      ---

      For more information about Dr. Lombardo's book Three Generations, No Imbeciles, visit https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/12262/three-generations-no-imbeciles.

      ---

      For complete episode information, check out our episode guide on our website at https://relitigated.com/2025/07/16/13-reflections-on-buck-v-bell-an-interview-with-dr-paul-lombardo.

      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      1 h et 41 min
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment