Send us a text

In Episode 8 of Real Talk with Mohawk, Mohawk is joined by Eric “IronMan1971,” a longtime friend and former law enforcement partner, for an in-depth discussion on current law enforcement and public safety issues.

Drawing from nearly three decades of shared experience in policing, military service, and public safety, the two career partners provide an insider perspective on the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting involving Mr. Preti, including newly surfaced video, firearm considerations, and how officers assess threats during rapidly evolving situations.

The conversation also examines media narratives versus legal and factual realities, emphasizing why use-of-force decisions are evaluated based on what officers reasonably perceive in the moment, not with hindsight.

In the second half of the episode, Eric offers firsthand insight into the Memphis Safe Task Force, discussing why its presence has coincided with a significant reduction in violent crime and how coordinated enforcement strategies impact community safety.

This episode is a candid, experience-driven conversation between two career partners focused on accountability, public safety, and informed discussion beyond headlines.

Real Talk with Mohawk delivers experience-based analysis on public safety, crime, and leadership. Discussions are informed by firsthand exposure to law enforcement operations, military leadership, and community impact. This podcast focuses on outcomes, accountability, and real-world consequences, not political advocacy.

Send us a text

In this episode of Real Talk with Mohawk, we break down the Minneapolis shooting involving Border Patrol agents and Alex Preti.

As a 27-year law enforcement veteran and certified use-of-force instructor, Mohawk analyzes the incident using facts, video review, and established legal standards not emotion or politics.

This episode covers:

• What actually happened before the shooting
• The difference between a protest and interference with law enforcement
• Why being armed while committing illegal acts matters legally
• What “objective reasonableness” under Graham v. Connor really means
• Why officers do not need to see a weapon to perceive a lethal threat
• How split-second decisions are judged without 20/20 hindsight

Mohawk also addresses misinformation about federal agents, training standards, and the consequences of escalating police encounters in emotionally charged environments.

This is not about taking sides. It’s about understanding the law, use-of-force principles, and how quickly situations turn deadly when lines are crossed.

Real Talk!

Real Talk with Mohawk delivers experience-based analysis on public safety, crime, and leadership. Discussions are informed by firsthand exposure to law enforcement operations, military leadership, and community impact. This podcast focuses on outcomes, accountability, and real-world consequences, not political advocacy.

Send us a text

In this episode of Real Talk with Mohawk, we break down police use-of-force through the legal standards that govern real-world encounters. Using Graham v. Connor and Tennessee v. Garner, we explain how courts determine whether force was objectively reasonable based on what officers knew at the precise moment force was applied.

This episode covers use-of-force law, pre-force behavior, threat perception, subject positioning, and why context matters more than hindsight or viral commentary. The discussion is grounded in case law, policy, and real-world law enforcement experience.

Clarification: References to subject positioning in this episode reflect hands placed behind the head at the time force was applied, consistent with the analysis discussed.

Keywords: police use of force, Graham v Connor, Tennessee v Garner, objective reasonableness, law enforcement analysis, police accountability, use of force policy, Real Talk with Mohawk

Real Talk with Mohawk delivers direct, fact-based legal and policy analysis on policing and public safety.

Real Talk with Mohawk delivers experience-based analysis on public safety, crime, and leadership. Discussions are informed by firsthand exposure to law enforcement operations, military leadership, and community impact. This podcast focuses on outcomes, accountability, and real-world consequences, not political advocacy.