Mystrikast — Meta-Dogma
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
Mystrikast — Meta-Dogma
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
This episode is a walk through a Mystrikal paradox: we don’t do frozen certainty, but we do have a core practice that we treat seriously, ongoing inquiry as a kind of meta-dogma.
I’m using “dogma” in the broad sense (shared doctrine / settled view), not the rigid “don’t question this” version. The rigid version is exactly what Mystrikism rejects. Instead, we treat doubt as a co-pilot: question authority, including the sermon; put evidence on a pedestal, but don’t worship the pedestal; keep even your best beliefs pencilled in.
Then we flip the emotional vibe: this isn’t cold cynicism. In Mystrikism, mystery is treated as something almost, but not quite, “holy”, the birthplace of wonder, humility, and a natural, rational “spirituality” that doesn’t rely on anything supernatural. From there, we land in the practical payoff: holding beliefs lightly makes it easier to grow, easier to empathise, and easier to update your “map of reality” without turning it into an identity crisis.
It’s basically a love letter to the sentence: “I don’t know”… said with a straight back and a curious grin.
https://www.mystrikism.org
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1782830925522213/
mystrikism@pm.me
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
