What happens when 12 jurors hear the same evidence—but one of them cannot agree with the other 11?

In this episode of Ivory Rose Knows, we take a deep look at the Lindsay Clancy case and the mistrial that followed after the jury reportedly deadlocked 11–1.

We’re talking about the deaths of Lindsay’s three children, the defense’s claims surrounding postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility, the prosecution’s arguments, the meaning of reasonable doubt, and the difficult questions raised by a jury that could not reach a unanimous verdict.

But this episode isn't just about what happened in the courtroom.

It’s about the bigger questions:

How do we determine criminal responsibility when severe mental illness is involved?

How much weight should a jury give psychiatric evidence?

What happens when one juror disagrees with everyone else?

And perhaps most importantly:

Where does the case go from here?

Ivory Rose asks the quiet part out loud—but we're not here to tell you what to think. We're here to examine the evidence, the legal issues, the unanswered questions, and the human tragedy underneath it all.

🎧 Listen now, and then tell me what YOU think.

📧 Cases, tips & questions: IvoryRoseKnows@gmail.com

📚 My book, When the Creators Became the Story, is coming soon.

Follow Ivory Rose Knows across all platforms for true crime, trending stories, internet drama, and the conversations nobody else wants to have.

I'm Ivory Rose… and I'm just saying: there's that.