Couverture de Keepin' It Brief

Keepin' It Brief

Keepin' It Brief

De : Annica
Écouter gratuitement

3 mois pour 0,99 €/mois

Après 3 mois, 9.95 €/mois. Offre soumise à conditions.

À propos de ce contenu audio

 While attending University I ran into a problem with my studying, There just wasn't enough time in the day. Keepin' It Brief was started to Brief law cases in a more school-structured way in order to benefit students pursuing Law focused degrees. I hope this podcast will make it easier for those of you like me who didn't have the time to read the case yourself, but do have the time to keep it brief.KeepinIt Brief 2023
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Épisodes
    • Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors inc. NJ 1960

      Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors inc. NJ 1960
      Jun 27 2023

      Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen visited Bloomfield Motors to look at a Plymouth car. Mr. Henningsen moved forward with buying the car as a gift for his wife, but then She gets into a car accident due to a vehicular malfunction. Who is at fault?Case link: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1960/32-n-j-358-0.html
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      11 min
    • Lawrence v. Texas 539 US 558 2003

      Lawrence v. Texas 539 US 558 2003
      Jun 20 2023
      The Houston police enter the private residence of Lawrence when responding to a report of a weapon disturbance. They walk in on Lawrence and another man Gardner engaging in Consensual Sexual Activity. These men were arrested and convicted of “deviate sexual intercourse" in violation of a Texas Statute that forbids same-sex sexual interaction. Case Links:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/558/case.pdf
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      19 min
    • Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 504 US 555 1992

      Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 504 US 555 1992
      Jun 13 2023
      This case was over the endangered species act of 1973 which divided the responsibility of protecting wildlife between the Secretary of Interior and the Secretary of Commerce. It also required that each federal entity consults with the right secretary to ensure no wildlife is being harmed.Case Link: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/504/555/case.pdf
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      14 min
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment