I Fixed The NBA's MVP Voting Problem In This Special Interview With @LakersFastBreak
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Send us Fan Mail
The NBA MVP race is supposed to reward the most valuable player, but the closer you look, the more it starts to feel like a narrative contest. I’m joined again by Gerald Glasford, founder and creator of Lakers Fast Break, to get brutally honest about what’s driving the vote down the stretch and why late-season dominance doesn’t always change minds. If you’ve been watching Luka Doncic put up historic numbers and wondering how he’s still not the clear favorite, we walk through the uncomfortable answer: the media often picks the story first, then spends the rest of the season defending it.
We dig into the real MVP cases for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Luka, Victor Wembanyama, and Nikola Jokic and why each one exposes a different set of “rules” voters claim to care about. We talk consistency, team record, expectations, defense, free throws, and why the standards seem to shift depending on the candidate. And yes, we get into the foul-drawing discourse, because you can’t talk modern NBA scoring without talking about how points are actually generated.
Then we bring it home to the Lakers playoff outlook: which first-round matchup we want, which one we’d rather avoid, and what has to hold up when postseason defenses take away easy offense. Gerald breaks down the bench concerns, the adjustments that matter, and the one version of this team that can make a real run if it shows up at the right time. If you enjoyed the conversation, subscribe, share it with a Lakers fan who loves arguing MVP, and leave a review with your pick: who’s your MVP and why?
www.stephanpiscanopodcast.com
To Follow Us On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VacationWealthPartners