Couverture de Future-Proof PT

Future-Proof PT

Future-Proof PT

De : Dana Strauss PT DPT and Alex Bendersky PT DPT
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de ce contenu audio

Want to stay ahead of the curve in physical therapy? Future Proof PT brings you straight-talking, no-nonsense conversations about what really matters in healthcare today. From dissecting policy risks and opportunities to exploring innovative practice and payment models to practical ways to accelerate your career growth, we're your go-to source for understanding the forces reshaping our profession and the healthcare industry at large.


Through candid dialogue and real-world perspectives, we're building a community of forward-thinking professionals working both in and out of direct patient care. They aren't just adapting to change – they're shaping it.


Whether you're looking to understand market dynamics or seeking professional growth, each episode delivers actionable insights that will transform how you view the future of healthcare. Come join the conversation!

Copyright 2025 Dana Strauss, PT, DPT and Alex Bendersky, PT, DPT
Economie Hygiène et vie saine Maladie et pathologies physiques Politique et gouvernement Sciences politiques
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Épisodes
    • Episode 26: The PT Identity Project | The Problems Causing PTs Patients, Pay, and Progress
      Feb 20 2026

      We are tackling physical therapy's brand crisis head-on. From pop culture portrayals (yes, we're talking about that "Land Man" stripper scene) to CMS policy that treats PT as "substitute spend" for MSK digital health solutions, the evidence is clear: we have a public perception problem.


      We explore why professional identity matters, how specialization creates internal dissonance, and why evidence-based practice sometimes conflicts with how we want to be perceived. We talk about the importance of communicating our actual skill set, and why we need to stop being terrible at telling people what we do and why it matters.


      Why this matters right now:


      Value-based care and episode/bundled payment models are framed as the future: fewer visits, higher impact per encounter. But remaining the PT who serves as the primary provider for managing their patients' longitudinal spend. In those models, PTs “win” by preventing downstream costs (imaging, opioids, injections, surgery, prolonged disability). But that only works if we can show it.


      Key topics: professional branding, healthcare policy, payment models, public perception, advocacy, and the path forward for elevating the profession.


      Mentioned in the episode:


      Nassim Taleb | "Skin in the Game" Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life


      Episode Quality Improvement Plan (EQIP)


      ACCESS Model


      ACCESS Technical FAQs



      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      33 min
    • Episode 25 | Pain Science, Manual Therapy, and the Economics of PT with Paul Ingraham
      Jan 26 2026
      Explore the intersection of evidence-based practice, healthcare economics, and pseudoscience in rehab, plus practical strategies for clinicians who want to do better without going brokeIs your physical therapy practice built on evidence, or just what pays? In this episode, we sit down with Paul Ingraham, science writer and founder of painscience.com, to challenge the line between evidence-based practice and pseudoscience in rehab. We explore why manual therapy needs a serious reframe, how economic pressures push clinicians toward uncertain treatments, and whether honest patient communication can coexist with running a profitable practice. Paul doesn't hold back: he argues that most PTs operate in a gray zone where research is weak, outcomes are unpredictable, and informed consent is virtually nonexistent. You might not agree with everything he says—but you'll hopefully question what you do and why you do it. Maybe you'll look into the scientific evidence behind your current common care plans.Topics include:Evidence-based practice vs. pseudoscience: where's the line? Why manual therapy should be reframed as an experimental intervention in many casesThe role of informed consent in uncertain treatments (not unlike what we hope physicians do when prescribing a treatment plan whose results are uncertain)How value-based care incentives better outcomes and discourages pseudoscienceThe economics of PT: balancing integrity with incomeWhy strength training and exercise therapy are still key ingredients in PT treatment plansTeaching intellectual humility and critical thinking in healthcare educationPractical strategies for clinicians who want to practice honestly without going brokePaul Ingraham is a Vancouver science writer and a former Registered Massage Therapist, a profession he left in 2010 over concerns about its pseudoscientific nonsense. Since then, he has been publishing PainScience.com full-time, a website about the science of pain and injury, known for its rich footnotes and anti-quackery activism. The site offers hundreds of articles and ten books, all based on a huge bibliography. Paul was an active amateur athlete for decades, especially in ultimate (the Frisbee sport), but has now retired from competitive intensity and “just” does a lot of running and cycling, despite grappling with his own chronic pain/illness problems since 2015.Here's where you can find Paul! https://www.painscience.com/subscribe [free newsletter]https://www.painscience.com/ebookshttps://www.facebook.com/painsciencehttps://www.threads.net/@painscihttps://bsky.app/profile/painsci.bsky.socialhttps://x.com/painsciSign up for our newsletter, where Alex shares weekly literature summaries and links relevant to therapy.Sign up for our sister publication, authored by Dana, Timeless Autonomy. Dana covers weekly health policy insights and tips on career growth for clinicians.Subscribe to our YouTube Channel
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      1 h et 12 min
    • Episode 24: The Economics of PT-First | Real Data on Cost Savings and Outcomes
      Jan 17 2026
      How crazy is it that proven interventions in healthcare take so long to spread, even when they show clear economic and clinical benefits?Innovation in healthcare is painfully difficult to get into widespread adoption, even after proven successful.This episode discusses the results of a nine year-old study at Geisinger Health System on a PT-First "bundle" that's just as relevant today. But the disturbing part about it is it's not common to find a structure like this one, where a shift in incentives changed the care pathway for patients.Here are major takeaways from the episode:PT-First Models Are Economically Proven: When properly structured with the right incentives, physical therapy as a first-line intervention for musculoskeletal conditions reduces costs and improves outcomes. This has been demonstrated at scale.Risk Stratification Is Your Friend: Implementing tools that identify high-risk patients (for joint replacement, high utilization, poor psychosocial factors) helps you target PT-first interventions where they'll have the most impact.Understand the Regulatory Landscape: Know the difference between what commercial plans can do versus Medicare constraints. This helps you understand why some innovations work in certain settings but not others, and where to focus your advocacy efforts. And don't forget to explore CMS Innovation Center Models! They are a key opportunity for Medicare to offer flexibilities outside of statute and PTs and OTs can 100% benefit from this!Patient Incentives Matter as Much as Provider Incentives: Waiving or reducing copays for PT-first approaches changes patient behavior. Consider how your practice can work with payers to create these incentives.Think Beyond Traditional Treatment: The food-as-medicine example challenges PTs to consider all drivers of health outcomes, not just manual therapy and exercise. What are the non-medical factors affecting your patients' success?Health Systems with Their Own Plans Are Innovation Leaders: These integrated systems have the most flexibility and motivation to try new models. Consider targeting these organizations for partnerships or employment.The "Why Not Everywhere?" Question: Just because something works doesn't mean it spreads quickly in healthcare. Understanding the barriers to adoption (regulatory constraints, organizational inertia, population mix) helps you be more strategic about implementing change.Keep It Simple: As Alex notes - "kiss things" "(keep it simple, stupid"). The most successful innovations have clear, straightforward incentive structures that are easy for patients and providers to understand and act on.Find the article we discuss in this episode on a PT-First payment model here.Sign up for our newsletter, where Alex shares weekly literature summaries and links relevant to therapy.Sign up for our sister publication, authored by Dana, Timeless Autonomy. Dana covers weekly health policy insights and tips on career growth for clinicians.Subscribe to our YouTube ChannelWe also discussed in this episode the "Geisinger Fresh Food Farmacy" research. The pilot evaluated whether providing free, healthy food for the entire household of a food-insecure adult with Type 2 diabetes improves health outcomes and reduces healthcare use. In the podcast, Dana described what she recalled from memory. The study is found here but we can't find access to the article unlocked. Asking "Claude.AI," it said in this observational pilot study with 37 participants showed a 2.1% average drop in HbA1c levels and an 80% reduction in healthcare costs (from $240,000 to $48,000 per member per year). Additional research has recently been published put we can't locate it unlocked online. It looks like funding was from the 2018 Farm Bill.
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      33 min
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment