Couverture de Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns

Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns

Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns

De : Radio@targething.com (Rob Campbell & Amanda Suffecool)
Écouter gratuitement

Offres de saison | 0,99 € par mois pendant les 3 premiers mois

5,99 €/mois par la suite. Des conditions s’appliquent. Annulation mensuelle possible.
Live over the airwaves Salem Radio that is a Q&A related to personal protection, the 2nd amendment, guns, the shooting sports industry. Recorded live on SALEM at 5:00 pm est. Listen to the Podcasts, catch us live, or email in your questions to be covered on the next show. Radio@Targething.com. Our discussions include guns, pepper spray, defensive techniques, concealed carry, NRA, firearms, safety and a variety of others as the show is led by the originating topic and the questions asked by our listeners. Amanda Suffecool, Rob Campbell work to make the show lively and topical. Enjoy - Amanda2022
Épisodes
  • 102526 hr2

    102526 hr2
    Oct 26 2026
    In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss several Second Amendment legal developments, firearm rights, concealed-carry training, and personal stories. The episode emphasizes the hosts' view that gun owners should stay informed about changing laws, support organizations working on constitutional challenges, and continue practicing their defensive skills rather than waiting for an emergency to take training seriously. The show opens with Rob telling a story about seeing a man purchase four overflowing shopping carts of laundry detergent at a small store. Concerned about what someone might do with such a large quantity, Rob waited outside, recorded the man's license plate, and contacted the local sheriff. The sheriff questioned why the matter concerned law enforcement, leaving Rob frustrated that authorities did not seem to share his concerns about potentially suspicious activity. Rob explains that he wanted to report something unusual without having to research potentially alarming uses of the product himself. The story becomes a humorous discussion about how people can be reluctant to investigate suspicious behavior because online searches might create a misleading impression about their intentions. The conversation then shifts to Amanda and Rob's experience as movie extras in White Boy Rick, starring Matthew McConaughey. They describe how a scene is filmed repeatedly from different camera angles, with extras repositioning themselves between takes. Amanda recalls meeting a man whose hobby was using his vacation time to appear in movies. He told them that he had spent much of an 11-day production nearly naked, wearing only a modesty garment. The hosts joke about how unusual that hobby seemed to them and how they avoid searching for certain terms on their own phones because search histories can lead to unexpected advertising. Rob recalls being close enough to McConaughey to watch him repeatedly perform his scenes while Rob handled props. They recommend appearing as an extra as an interesting life experience, although neither seems eager to repeat it. Second Amendment Organizations Challenge New Mexico's Waiting Period Amanda discusses cooperation among major gun-rights organizations, particularly the National Rifle Association (NRA), the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF). She says the organizations are working together in a federal lawsuit challenging New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for firearm purchases. According to the hosts' account, a federal appeals court had ruled the waiting-period restriction unconstitutional, but New Mexico interpreted the ruling as applying only to two individuals who had standing in the case. Everyone else, the state maintained, would still have to wait seven days. The hosts object to the idea that a legal victory should benefit only the specific individuals involved rather than similarly situated citizens. They compare the situation with other cases in which a legal exception appears to apply to only one person or a small group. They support the organizations' decision to challenge New Mexico's interpretation and suggest that the dispute could continue through the courts. Their broader point is that cooperation among national organizations can help address restrictions that individual gun owners might struggle to challenge on their own. Pasted text(20261026-113651) Switchblade Laws and the Meaning of "Arms" The hosts next discuss a legal challenge to the federal switchblade law, which they describe as dating to the 1950s. They connect the original restrictions to the era's public concerns about juvenile delinquency and popular culture, including the film Rebel Without a Cause. Rob explains that spring-assisted knives have a much longer history, noting that similar designs were used centuries ago and that many companies manufactured different styles of switchblades before the federal restrictions were enacted. Amanda finds it significant that switchblades are now being discussed in the context of the Second Amendment. The hosts argue that the constitutional meaning of "arms" should not necessarily be limited to firearms or firearm components. They also mention a challenge involving New York's restrictions on body armor and speculate that courts may increasingly examine other items used for self-defense, including magazines, firearm triggers, and knives. Their discussion reflects their view that courts are reconsidering the scope of the Second Amendment after earlier legal interpretations narrowed the definition of protected arms. They expect additional disputes over what people may possess for defensive purposes, although the episode does not establish the eventual outcomes of the cases they mention. Pasted text(20261026-113651) Amicus Briefs and Restoring Gun Rights to Nonviolent Felons Amanda explains the purpose of an amicus curiae brief, commonly called a "friend of ...
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    54 min
  • 102526 hr1

    102526 hr1
    Oct 26 2026
    In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss changes in the firearms industry, the upcoming election, political advertising, responsible gun-shop practices, and a case involving a woman who allegedly threatened federal immigration officers. They also share humorous stories about their personalities, engineering and manufacturing experiences, and the challenges companies face when they acquire other businesses. The episode opens with Amanda describing Rob's quiet, observant personality at political events. Although he often sits quietly and appears disengaged, people around him have noticed that he pays close attention to what is happening. Amanda says people sometimes approach her to share comments they are reluctant to make directly to Rob, expecting her to pass the information along. The hosts then discuss Amanda's unusual sense of anticipation as hunting season and the election approach. Rob jokes that she might be hoping for hunting pictures or free sausage. Amanda admits she has considered hunting and even applied for a Wyoming pronghorn antelope permit, although she did not receive one. They discuss how hunting can teach patience and observation, but Amanda wonders whether she would find the experience relaxing or simply become more wound up. Their conversation briefly wanders into claims about the supposed health benefits of tobacco, with Amanda expressing skepticism about conspiracy theories Rob mentions. Smith & Wesson's Acquisition of Savage Arms One of the episode's main topics is the reported acquisition of Savage Arms by Smith & Wesson. The hosts consider why Smith & Wesson would purchase Savage, particularly when firearm sales have reportedly slowed and manufacturers may already have substantial inventories. They also compare this acquisition with their previous discussion of Ruger's decision to discontinue or suspend production of certain firearm models, speculating that changing market conditions may be forcing manufacturers to reconsider their product lines. Rob explains that Savage is primarily known for rifles, including hunting rifles and precision long-range firearms, while Smith & Wesson is better known for handguns. He suggests that acquiring Savage could give Smith & Wesson an established, in-house rifle brand and a stronger position in hunting and precision-rifle markets. Amanda wonders whether the acquisition could affect product quality, manufacturing, or the availability of existing models. Rob argues that good quality ultimately saves money because reliable products generate fewer warranty claims and satisfy customers. He praises Savage rifles for their accuracy and durability, particularly highlighting the company's improved trigger design, which he says helped push other manufacturers to improve their own rifle triggers. He distinguishes mechanical quality from cosmetic finishing, suggesting that less expensive firearms may have sharper edges and less refined finishes without necessarily sacrificing accuracy or function. He hopes Smith & Wesson will improve Savage's finishing and manufacturing standards rather than reduce quality. The hosts discuss a reported purchase price of approximately $160 million, along with assurances that there would be no immediate changes to staffing, facilities, or product lines. Amanda draws on her engineering career, explaining that she worked through three corporate acquisitions. In her experience, acquiring companies initially promise to leave operations unchanged but eventually introduce modifications. She suggests that differences in corporate priorities and management philosophies can create uncertainty for employees and customers. Manufacturing, Engineering, and the Importance of Experience The discussion expands into manufacturing practices and the difficulties of modernizing an established company. Rob recalls hearing about older firearms manufacturing equipment that remained in use for decades, including machinery associated with Colt's production of 1911 pistols. While old equipment may continue producing acceptable results, he explains that modern computerized machinery can improve production speed, consistency, and quality. Amanda points out that replacing equipment is not always as straightforward as management expects. Experienced workers often develop practical methods that are not fully documented in engineering drawings or written procedures. She jokingly describes the veteran employee who knows how to make everything fit but may resist new equipment or attempts to document his techniques. Rob agrees that manufacturing companies can discover problems when they attempt to reproduce established products strictly according to their drawings. Both hosts have experience with the difference between a design that looks correct on paper and one that works properly in practice. Rob recalls the historical difficulties manufacturers encountered when producing 1911 pistols under separate military...
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    54 min
  • 101826 hr2

    101826 hr2
    Oct 19 2026
    In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss Ruger's reported production changes, Michigan's firearm-storage law, and digital advertising challenges facing the firearms industry. Their guest, Brian Akin of Topple, also shares his personal experience with New Jersey firearms laws and explains how that experience led him to become an active Second Amendment supporter. The first major topic is Ruger's decision to suspend production of certain firearm models. Amanda and Rob explain that gun owners have been reacting to reports that Ruger may discontinue popular products, including the Blackhawk, Redhawk, LCR revolver, and No. 1 single-shot rifle. However, they emphasize Ruger's clarification that suspending production or completing final production runs does not necessarily mean entire product lines are permanently discontinued. The hosts suggest that the changes could reflect slower sales, excess inventory, production priorities, or plans for redesigned and improved models. They also discuss how firearm sales can fluctuate with the political climate, arguing that consumers sometimes purchase guns out of concern that future restrictions will limit their options. With Beretta Holdings reportedly owning a significant share of Ruger stock, they wonder whether that relationship could influence the company's future direction. Both hosts express interest in examining Ruger's announcements and new products at the upcoming SHOT Show rather than assuming the company is abandoning its traditional firearms. Amanda and Rob then examine Michigan's "Safe Homes, Safe Schools" law, which requires public and private schools to distribute firearm-storage information to parents and guardians. Amanda says the educational goal sounds reasonable, but argues that additional provisions make the law problematic. As the hosts describe it, the law generally requires unattended firearms to be unloaded and locked away when someone is likely to be present on the property. They question how a teenager could access a firearm for lawful home defense if it must remain locked and unloaded, and they highlight what they see as a conflict between secure-storage requirements and the possibility of defending oneself during an emergency. The hosts also report that approximately 58% of Michigan school districts were not complying with the requirement to distribute the information, despite the law having been in place for two years. They use this figure to question the effectiveness of passing legislation without ensuring compliance. These are the hosts' descriptions and criticisms of the law, rather than an independent legal analysis. The hosts briefly discuss the importance of civic participation before moving to the main interview. They encourage listeners to vote in local and national elections, research candidates and party platforms, and consider voting records and policy positions instead of judging candidates by yard signs, appearances, or personal annoyances. They suggest that local elections matter because elected officials influence decisions within communities. The discussion of the National Firearms Act and its laws is postponed until the following week because the guest interview takes priority. The featured guest is Brian Akin, founder of WeAreTopple.com, a digital advertising platform designed to connect firearms and outdoor-industry businesses with publishers willing to carry their advertisements. Akin explains that his background includes managing digital advertising campaigns for major brands on Madison Avenue. He noticed that firearms companies often faced restrictions from major advertising networks and platforms, while firearms-related publishers struggled to earn advertising revenue. Topple was created to address both problems by allowing businesses to advertise through firearms-friendly websites and other relevant outlets, including publications focused on hunting, farming, ranching, and conservative or libertarian news. Akin says the platform serves companies such as Magpul, Beretta, CZ USA, Federal, and Hornady, as well as local firearms dealers, ranges, training facilities, and instructors. Akin argues that restrictions on firearms-related advertising have made it difficult for businesses to reach potential customers and for publishers to monetize their work. He describes how complaints about advertisements appearing on particular websites can pressure major companies to withdraw advertising, reducing revenue for those publishers. He also alleges that organized advocacy groups, supported by wealthy donors, contributed to these efforts. These claims are presented as Akin's account of the industry and its history. He says Topple has had to build much of its advertising infrastructure from the ground up and is developing a substantially rebuilt version of the platform, called Topple 4.0, to provide firearms and outdoor businesses with more sophisticated advertising tools. The hosts ...
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    54 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment