Couverture de An Unimaginable Life

An Unimaginable Life

An Unimaginable Life

De : Christy Levy Spiritual Medium with Gary Temple Bodley
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de ce contenu audio

Christy is a one of the world’s most powerful mediums. In this podcast, Christy and channeler Gary Temple Bodley bring in those who have crossed over to share their nonphysical perspectives to tell us what’s really going on in our reality. The conversations are both fascinating and enlightening.Copyright 2023 All rights reserved. Sciences sociales Spiritualité
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Épisodes
    • Dead Talk: Safety Isn’t Real — Steadiness Is
      Feb 17 2026

      Read about The Freedom Project here

      Schedule a call with Gary to learn more about The Freedom Project here

      Introduction:

      What if the thing you’ve been chasing your entire life—safety—was never actually available in this reality?

      In this Dead Talk, Christy brings in Seneca (Roman Stoic philosopher and advisor to Nero) and Dorothy Day (Catholic anarchist, activist, and fierce advocate for human dignity). Together they deliver a perspective shift that will change the way you think about safety.

      Seneca’s message: “You were never meant to feel safe. You were meant to feel steady.”

      Seneca dismantles the modern definition of safety as “continuity without disruption,” calling it a made-up idea that life has never promised. He describes watching fortunes vanish overnight, alliances dissolve, empires collapse—and noticing that the greatest suffering wasn’t caused by loss itself, but by the people who postponed living until conditions improved.

      His definition of steadiness is piercing and practical:

      Steadiness isn’t predicting outcomes. It’s meeting whatever arrives without abandoning yourself.

      Dorothy Day’s response: “True—and incomplete.”

      You don’t survive uncertainty alone. You’re held through contact, belonging, and participation.

      She reframes “support” as something most people don’t recognize because they only count certain things as support. Her version of safety isn’t built on guarantees—it’s built on belonging before you feel secure.

      She introduces one of the most powerful lines of the episode:

      “Don’t wait until you feel safe to belong. Just belong.”

      The hidden trap: “Preparation” as disguised fear

      One of the most practical takeaways comes when they reveal how postponement hides:

      • “Once this is handled…”
      • “When I feel more secure…”
      • “I just need more information…”
      • “I need the timing to be right…”

      They don’t call these wrong—but they point out the pattern: Safety becomes a precondition for movement, and suddenly you’re not living… you’re negotiating.

      “If safety were not my concern, what would I do next?”

      Why you’ll want to listen

      It’s an episode that changes the language of your inner world.

      By the end, you may find yourself questioning whether “safety” has been your unconscious religion—and whether steadiness is the freedom you were actually designed for.

      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      54 min
    • Inner Freedom After Trauma with Etty Hillesum and Vaclav Havel
      Jan 31 2026
      Read about The Freedom Project here Schedule a call with Gary to learn more about The Freedom Project here This Dead Talk episode is a channeled teaching on inner freedom after trauma, guided by two historical figures: Etty Hillesum (young Jewish diarist who wrote from Westerbork and later Auschwitz) and Václav Havel (Czech dissident who became the first president of the Czech Republic after the Velvet Revolution). The core theme: freedom doesn’t come from being unhurt or from circumstances improving—it comes from no longer organizing life around the wound. Etty found freedom inside a collapsing world (Holocaust reality).Havel found freedom inside an oppressive structure (communism), and lived long enough to see inner freedom reflected outward in social change. The main teaching: trauma is not the event They redefine trauma as not what happened, and not even the pain. Trauma is: the moment life became smaller to survive,the internal contraction that says: I must be less open, feel less, expect less, risk less. This contraction becomes an internal “government” that continues long after the danger passes. It decides what you can feel, hope for, explore, or trust. In that sense, trauma is protective, intelligent, temporary by design—but it becomes limiting when it interferes with love, presence, and the ability to be touched by something good. Freedom, they say, is not “healing trauma” as a project. It’s outgrowing it by restoring your range: what you’re willing to feel,how much you’re willing to love,how much you’re willing to let in. “Imprint” vs trauma They introduce a second layer: imprint—fear and limitation installed before you had direct experience or choice. Imprints come from: parents, culture, religion, schooling, media, authority,warnings and stories that the child’s body stores as reality, not information,and sometimes genetic or past-life residue. Because imprint fear is “older” than the current opportunity, it cannot be reasoned away. It must be met. The body is reacting to memory, not to now. Examples of common imprints: Money: “money runs out,” “never enough,” “security requires effort.”Authority: “I’ll get in trouble,” “rules protect me from myself.”Love: “if I’m fully myself, I’ll be left,” “connection is fragile.”Body/health: “symptoms mean danger,” “aging means decline.”Visibility/expression: “being free has consequences.” They note the irony: many listeners are not materially poor, yet their nervous systems are “poor” from imprinting. Practical guidance they offer They emphasize this is not a heavy “healing session,” but a noticing: “Who are you now that your nervous system no longer needs to lead your life?”“What became unavailable that might now be safe to reopen?” Key practices: Acknowledge the story as a helper “Thank you for helping me survive. You don’t need to work so hard anymore.” The story persists when it doesn’t feel recognized.Replace “Why did this happen?” with “What’s happening now?” “Why” pulls you into the past; “now” returns you to presence.When you feel righteous/need to be right: check the body Righteousness can signal you’re inside a trauma loop—trading aliveness for certainty.Ask: “What does this story allow me to avoid risking?” Trauma stories often protect you from the vulnerability of expansion.Use proximity, not coercion Don’t force yourself through fear. Sit with it, let the body learn safety gradually.Talk to fear without consulting it “I see you’re afraid. Thank you for trying to keep me safe. We don’t have to decide today.” They make a key distinction: overriding fear to do something “wild” isn’t necessarily expansion—real expansion honors safety and lets fear soften through presence. Group field moment There’s a vivid description of the group’s energetic field: an oval, forward-oriented, permeable, slate-blue/soft gold tone—mature, coherent, grounded, not organized around wounds. “Connection without dependency; individuality without isolation.” Humor appears as a low “center of gravity”—less seriousness, more embodied decision-making. Etty’s “inner tower” and the role of acceptance Etty explains her awakening in the camps: it wasn’t dramatic kundalini-style; it began when she accepted the war would not end in time for her. That acceptance removed hope-as-victimhood and opened an “inner tower” (a state of unassailable coherence). The tower wasn’t protection—it was perspective. She remembered a dimension of being untouched by threat, time, or harm. Her line: “Belief didn’t save me. My alignment did.” The episode closes with a powerful reframing: At first, releasing struggle doesn’t feel like a rush—it feels like an exhale, a spaciousness.That space can feel unsettling because struggle used to provide identity.Eventually you see how “future safety” becomes ...
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      59 min
    • Dead Talk: How Abundance and Freedom are Vibrationally Attained
      Jan 20 2026

      To learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

      Two thinkers “arrive” right away: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Austria, philosopher of language) and Epictetus (Greek Stoic, formerly enslaved). Their combined theme becomes the episode’s core message: abundance and freedom don’t respond to self-improvement—they respond to present-moment participation, and the language we use either keeps us in “now” or pushes us into fear-based “later.”

      Wittgenstein’s thread focuses on how our sentences shape our reality. He points out that many spiritual and abundance struggles are reinforced by everyday grammar: “I’m not ready,” “I’m not healed,” “I must become something else.” These are described as grammatical habits that turn life into a test to pass. Abundance (money, time, health, love) doesn’t show up when we “deserve it” or “fix ourselves”—it shows up when we stop managing it with fear and engage with what’s here.

      Epictetus brings a steady, immovable energy and reframes freedom as the absence of inner argument with life. He shares the Stoic insight that suffering isn’t primarily caused by circumstances, but by the internal insistence: “This shouldn’t be happening.” Freedom, he says, is not growth but subtraction—not becoming more powerful, but noticing where we’ve been giving power away (waiting for conditions to improve, needing certainty, money, approval) and simply stopping.

      The conversation then turns practical around money. The guides suggest money feels uniquely “heavy” because we use it to answer a future-based question: “Will I be okay later?” Unlike health, relationships, or time (experienced in the present), money is often used as emotional insurance—asked to provide safety, which “isn’t its job.” The episode offers a language-based reframe: shift from future-security sentences to present-usefulness. A key line: stop asking money to protect you from time.

      They also address the belief in “sources of money” (job, investments, rentals) as a limiter: the true source is you, via inspiration and participation. Scarcity is framed less as “not enough money” and more as fear of letting it move—guarding rather than participating.

      Finally, they connect abundance and freedom as essentially parallel states: both are results of alignment and present-moment engagement. Freedom is “living as cause, not effect,” and abundance is “having what you need when you need it to do what needs doing”—both emerge when we stop requiring conditions to be different before we allow peace.

      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      52 min
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment