#61 David Enoch | Why This Oxford Professor Thinks Morality is Objective
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
#61 David Enoch | Why This Oxford Professor Thinks Morality is Objective
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Dr. David Enoch, author of "Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism," joins me to discuss moral realism versus anti-realism, objections from the moral error theorist, and my personal sticking points in affirming the existence of irreducible moral facts: moral disagreement across cultures and evolutionary explanations for our moral beliefs.
Buy David's book defending robust moral realism.
To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee.
Feel free to follow me Twitter.
EPISODE CHAPTERS
00:00:00 Introduction
00:07:23 Naturalism vs. non-naturalism
00:19:23 Why should we reject moral error theory?
00:32:32 The revisionary costs of error theory
00:43:34 Intuition as our only ground for moral realism?
00:47:45 The connection to ethical intuitionism
00:51:19 Objection #1 - Moral disagreement
01:03:18 Moral skepticism
01:06:20 Objection #2 - Evolutionary debunking arguments
01:16:16 Is God required to explain objective morality?
01:20:45 Are most philosophers moral realists?
Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
