16. Should randos rule the world?
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
Imagine if a House of Parliament or Congress wasn't elected. Wouldn't that be undemocratic? Actually, it could be more democratic.
To get elected, politicians join a party, toe the party's line, raise money, and look after the powerful first. They are unrepresentative in other ways—they are twice as educated, many times better off, and middle-aged. Though in America, as in Soviet Russia towards the end, we're getting used to 80-somethings running the show.
So how do we make politicians more representative? Don't elect them.
Instead, have a people's branch selected by lottery, just as juries are. We trust juries to decide whether a suspected criminal goes free, so why shouldn't we trust people like us to have a say in our taxes or how we regulate media?
In this week's video, I explore how regular people in citizens' juries take their duties seriously, seeking compromise and turning the tide against the engines of oligarchy. It's a way to bring some calm and sanity to our democracies by allowing everyday folk to talk things over and think things through.
▶ Enjoy the next episode next week
📽️ Find this video on YouTube
🎙️ Listen to the “Talking it Through” episode where I talk more about these ideas on YouTube or Spotify
👉 Join the conversation on my Discord server