Couverture de 1.1 Durham Files - Sussman Indictment

1.1 Durham Files - Sussman Indictment

1.1 Durham Files - Sussman Indictment

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails

3 mois pour 0,99 €/mois

Après 3 mois, 9.95 €/mois. Offre soumise à conditions.

À propos de ce contenu audio

 On Thursday, 16 September 2021 the DOJ’s special council office releases the following statement Grand jury indicts DC attorney with making false statements to the FBI !  Let’s see what has been released and dig a bit deeper into this intriguing case as we continue discovery with the Durham Files on Signal not noise Special counsel John Durham announced that a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging Michael Sussman, a Washington DC based attorney with making a full statement to the FBI regarding a secret channel of communications between the trump organisation and a Russian entity,  Alpha Bank. So who is Michael Sussman? you won’t be surprised to hear that he is a lawyer from the firm Perkins Cooee.  He was previously employed by the US Department of justice in various capacities and in these roles he became familiar with US criminal law including title 18 US C section 1001 which criminalises making materially false statements to US Officials specifically. In April 2016 he was retained by the DNC (Democratic national committee) to represent them in connection with the alleged hacking of its email service by the Russian government where he communicated regularly with the FBI DOJ and other government agencies. He was also advising the Clinton campaign in connection with cyber security issues.So I would also like you to meet two people that are very important in this sequence of events.First off is Rodney Joffe. Rodney is the retired senior vice president and security chief technology officer for Neustar which provides Internet and related services to more than 8000 commercial and government clients around the world. Funnily enough Josh was temporarily offered the top cyber security job by the Democrats when it look like they would win he also added I definitely would not take the job under TrumpNext is April Lorenzo who has founded two tech firms. Her companies have been contracted with by the US Department of homeland security and other agencies. in that role she oversees one of the worlds largest system of DNS records which can be searched to uncover potential security threats. She also specialises in identifying spoofed domains use for email fishing scams.So now we know the players, let’s see what the indictment lays out.  At this point it is made clear in the indictment that not only do they have all the emails between these characters but they also have all the bills that Sussman charges the Clinton Campaign with. Early in July 2016 Leversen assembles data reflecting DNS hook ups between alpha bank and Trump which Joffe advises Sussman and they subsequently meet with the Clinton campaign and share this info.   In early August Joffe uses his access at multiple major Internet companies to coerce a negative narrative regarding Trump. On August 21 Joffe emails all involved and says to push forward with additional research concerning Trump in order to give the base of a very useful narrative later. in the same email he expressed his belief that the trump domain was not a secret communication chat channel with Russian alpha Bank but a red herring.  The next day the following email was sent…… let’s for moment think of the best case scenario where we are able to show somehow that DNS communication exists between Trump and Russia. How do we plan to defend against the criticism that this is not spoofed traffic we are observing ? There is no answer to that. Let’s assume again they are not smart enough to refute our best case scenario. Joffe, you do realise that we will have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make a very week association? Let’s all reflect upon that from moment. Sorry folks, but unless we get combine net flow and DNS traffic collected at critical points between suspect organisations we cannot technically make any claims that would fly public scrutiny. The only thing that drives at this point is that we just do not like Trump. This will not fly in the eyes of public scrutiny folks I am afraid we have tunnel vision. time to regroup ? despite this analysis, Sussman Joffe & Levinson decide to proceed with a white paper outlining the plot,  All this time, Sussman is charging the Clinton campaign for the hours they review this document. On September 16 Leverson writes a piece on the mechanics of how the Trump campaign connects with Alfa bank. Immediatley, Sussman drops the info on the media.September 19, Sussman meets the FBI general council Jim baker alone, and in this meeting he stated that he was not acting on the behalf of any client, which leads banks to understand Sussman was acting as a good citizen.  Sussman provides the following  1. that he had been approached by multiple cyber experts concerning alpha bank and Trump 2. the name of three cyber experts ( but not Jeff anyone associated with this work)3. that media had info about Trumps secret server  4. the white paper And of course,  Sussman bills this work  to Clinton campaign...
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment