Votre titre Audible gratuit

9,95 € / mois après 30 jours. Résiliable à tout moment.

ou
Dans le panier

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !

    Description

    A decadent rock star. A deeply religious radio host. A disgraced scientist. And a teenage girl who may be the world’s last hope. From the mind of Chuck Wendig comes "a magnum opus...a story about survival that’s not just about you and me, but all of us, together" (Kirkus Reviews starred review).

    Nominated for the Bram Stoker Award

    Named one of the Best Books of the Year by:

    • The Washington Post
    • NPR
    • The Dallas Morning News
    • Kirkus Reviews
    • Publishers Weekly
    • Library Journal 
    • Polygon

    Shana wakes up one morning to discover her little sister in the grip of a strange malady. She appears to be sleepwalking. She cannot talk and cannot be woken up. And she is heading with inexorable determination to a destination that only she knows. But Shana and her sister are not alone. Soon, they are joined by a flock of sleepwalkers from across America, on the same mysterious journey. And like Shana, there are other "shepherds" who follow the flock to protect their friends and family on the long dark road ahead.

    For as the sleepwalking phenomenon awakens terror and violence in America, the real danger may not be the epidemic but the fear of it. With society collapsing all around them - and an ultraviolent militia threatening to exterminate them - the fate of the sleepwalkers depends on unraveling the mystery behind the epidemic. The terrifying secret will either tear the nation apart - or bring the survivors together to remake a shattered world.

    In development for TV by Glen Mazzara, executive producer of The Walking Dead 

    Look for the sequel in 2022 

    Praise for Wanderers

    "This career-defining epic deserves its inevitable comparisons to Stephen King’s The Stand." (Publishers Weekly starred review)

    "A suspenseful, twisty, satisfying, surprising, thought-provoking epic." (Harlan Coben, number one New York Times best-selling author of Run Away)

    "A true tour de force." (Erin Morgenstern, New York Times best-selling author of The Night Circus)

    "A masterpiece with prose as sharp and heartbreaking as Station Eleven." (Peng Shepherd, author of The Book of M)

    "A magnum opus.... It reminded me of Stephen King’s The Stand - but dare I say, this story is even better." (James Rollins, number one New York Times best-selling author of Crucible)

    "An inventive, fierce, uncompromising, stay-up-way-past-bedtime masterwork." (Paul Tremblay, author of A Head Full of Ghosts and The Cabin at the End of the World)

    "An American epic for these times." (Charles Soule, author of The Oracle Year)

    ©2019 Chuck Wendig (P)2019 Random House Audio

    Commentaires

    "Wanderers is amazing - huge, current, both broad and intensely personal, blending the contemplative apocalypse of Station Eleven with the compulsive readability of the best thrillers." (Django Wexler, author of the Shadow Campaigns series)

    "Chuck Wendig’s latest, Wanderers, is a magnum opus of both storytelling and prose, epic in scope, yet told with an intimacy that hooked me from the first page. It reminded me of a technological version of Stephen King’s The Stand - but dare I say, this is even better: a postapocalyptic horror story that bares the best and worst of humanity in all its rawest forms. Don’t miss this tour de force. It left me awed." (James Rollins, number-one New York Times best-selling author of Crucible)

    "With Wanderers, Chuck Wendig levels up - and when you consider the high level he was already writing at, that's saying something." (John Scalzi, New York Times best-selling author of The Consuming Fire)

    Ce que les auditeurs disent de Wanderers

    Notations
    Global
    • 5 out of 5 stars
    • 5 étoiles
      1
    • 4 étoiles
      0
    • 3 étoiles
      0
    • 2 étoiles
      0
    • 1 étoile
      0
    Interprétation
    • 5 out of 5 stars
    • 5 étoiles
      1
    • 4 étoiles
      0
    • 3 étoiles
      0
    • 2 étoiles
      0
    • 1 étoile
      0
    Histoire
    • 5 out of 5 stars
    • 5 étoiles
      1
    • 4 étoiles
      0
    • 3 étoiles
      0
    • 2 étoiles
      0
    • 1 étoile
      0

    Commentaires - Veuillez sélectionner les onglets ci-dessous pour changer la provenance des commentaires.

    Il n'y a pas encore de critique disponible pour ce titre.
    Trier par :
    Trier par:
    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Allan T. Maule
    • Allan T. Maule
    • 29/07/2019

    Recommended, with some issues

    Wanderers wants to be a 21st-century rendition of Stephen King's THE STAND: an epic story of American societal collapse and survival in the face of a deadly epidemic. Sometimes, it succeeds: the scope of the story and the twists of the plot are top-notch, and it's certainly a good page-turner. There's no question I enjoyed this book, and if you need an engaging and well-researched read about how our troubled world could collapse, WANDERERS is easy to recommend.

    So why only 3 stars Overall and for Performance? Mostly to give potential readers some perspective in between the absolutely gushing reviews and the 1-star haters on this site. So now that I've recommended this read, here are the reason WANDERERS is not perfect and might not be for you:

    1) LENGTH: This is a marathon of a book in audio or print, and I can't shake the feeling that it needed another 80–100 pages of squishing in order to keep the plot moving. Wendig knows how to tell a good story, so the pacing is generally pretty quick. Still, every character had several internal monologues where I was saying "OK, I get it," as I wished the author would move on to the rest of the action. This brings me to my next quibble...

    2) CHARACTERS: As an epic-in-scope story, WANDERERS has a LOT of main characters who get to command narrative attention and tone in their chapters. Some of them you will like a lot. Others you will dislike, but understand. And still others will make you ask: "Wait, why are you doing that? What's motivating you to think that's a good idea?" I've read enough novels to know I don't have to love or identify with all the characters to enjoy the story, but WANDERERS at times had me puzzled why certain characters behaved the way they did. At worst, it feels like they're acting to advance the plot or just do oddball funny things to lighten the novel's tone rather than behaving in a believable manner. Perhaps this will not bother a less critical reader, but it irked me.

    3) POLITICS: If you've ever peeked at Wendig's Twitter feed, you know he's an outspoken progressive—and personally, I agree with him on a ton of levels. My issue here is not that I disagree with his rather bleak view of modern conservatism, but rather that there's not a lot of nuance in how he depicts the American political divide in this book. Outspoken conservatives in this book inevitably end up on the side of monsters, and those sympathetic to such views get co-opted by the monsters and suffer horribly as a result. This won't be a problem for many liberal-minded readers, but where I got hung up was how essentially every character has internal monologues that stop the action to reflect on their political leanings at some point in the story. At worst, these moments feel like the author is signalling us "Don't worry, this character is a liberal" in order to get us to like them. Perhaps this is an inevitable land-mine for a novel set in 2019 America, but I feel like the author is going to irritate or distract a lot of readers by constantly bringing politics into a story that doesn't always require it.

    4) PERFORMANCE: There's a pretty marked contrast in acting ability between the two narrators. While Dominic Hoffman has a pleasant voice, he cannot do a British or Irish accent to save his life. What's more, his narration can sometimes become stilted when switching between characters during dialog. Xe Sands is generally better across the board at reading the sections narrated by the female characters, as she empathizes with the characters with more skill. These VO issues don't cripple the book, but I wish the producers had gotten two 5-star voice actors instead of one great voice and one okay voice.

    5) SEXUAL VIOLENCE: There's one episode of rape in this book that is both graphic and unexpected, as the character perpetuating it doesn't give much warning that he's capable of this kind of sexual violence in this moment. While it may or may not belong in the story, I found it shocking when it occurred and kept wondering if it was really necessary to the plot. Other readers may not arrive at the same judgment, but I note this here as a trigger warning for anyone who knows they'll be bothered by this kind of content.

    CONCLUSION:
    WANDERERS is a good, long book that I enjoyed. I felt bothered enough by its imperfections to write this review. I hope this helps you decide if this novel will be up your alley or not.

    277 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Megan Wright
    • Megan Wright
    • 13/08/2019

    interesting

    I struggled wth finishing this book, which rarely happens to me. I liked a few characters in the book but that is the only good thing I can say. I usually find redeeming qualities, not this time. 90 + chapters of liberal propaganda, hate smeared CNN talking points, dang near killed me. If you hate white Christians, if you hate all white, southern males because every single one must be a racist white supremacist, you hate police or military, hate God or dont believe, are mostly against guns.. but a bit on the fence, enjoy male on male rape and love constant cussing this book is for you. The rest of the rational, reasonable readers or non politicals.... keep looking.
    I shouldnt know, and dont want or need to know authors political affiliations. It had potential...

    37 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Dmz123
    • Dmz123
    • 24/10/2019

    Without warning- brutal, graphic rape

    Without any warning, the story has a brutal, graphic rape. I would not have purchased this book if I had known. I am disgusted and very disappointed. I am trying to return this book- only the 2nd return I have had.

    14 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Amy Citlau
    • Amy Citlau
    • 12/07/2019

    A worthy read

    Apocalyptic novels are written to explore morality, existence and meaning. At their best, they teach philosophy, religion and ethics while being deeply entertained. The Wanderers”, is the high water mark of the genre. It considers AI, racism, global warming, love, life and death and without being preachy reveals the tenuous position our world is in.

    Beyond all that, it was great to listen to. The pace might be too slow for some. But for those who love to be immersed into a story, you won’t do better than this.

    18 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour A. Musser
    • A. Musser
    • 30/09/2019

    Well, that was terrifying...

    So, this isn't the kind of book that kept me up at night spooking at strange noises but the overall premise of the book is certainly one that will give you cold chills. There is so much to unpack in this story. There are so many parallels to draw, so many intertwining storylines, so much politics, so much religion.

    First, a warning: This story includes rape and torture so if you're going to be triggered by such atrocities, you should absolutely skip this one. In addition, this book carries undercurrents of negativity towards religion and faith in God and ultimately uses the faithful as a plot device to form a mob to be exploited for power and uses it to rally people toward justifying atrocities in the name of faith that got a bit tough to swallow at some points. As the story moves on, we even have some parallels to Mary carrying the savior and it got tough to swallow toward the end. It just smacked of an author that has a deep disdain for faith and I found it a bit distasteful but not enough to ruin the book.

    Despite these warnings, the story was good and it held my attention. There were times the plot seemed to move slowly as we follow the wanderers and we meet so many different characters (some of whom we probably could have done without). This book is certainly chock full of people you can love to hate. There's not much redemption for most of the characters in this marathon and even the protagonist in Shana is abrasive, immature, and just grating at times with her stubborn attitude and headstrong logic-defying actions in many cases. Benji is supposed to be so smart and yet he so frequently defies logic in his action that he too often becomes a frustration. The fact is that the author could have done better by the reader to give us a few more truly good protagonists without making them so wildly flawed to the point of annoyance. Instead, the people that were easiest to like and care for are emotional fodder to pluck at your emotions in a way that felt a bit clumsy.

    However, all that aside, the story was truly a compelling listen. It was one long story but it rarely dragged in the audiobook. The narrators were good although Hoffman could use some work on accents. Sands narration was much more pleasing to hear.

    There's a poorly manifested love story built into the story that made me laugh out loud. It basically starts as such a cliche of a male fantasy that I literally rolled my eyes. However, clumsy attempt at romance aside, I'd still recommend the book.

    Despite the many flaws, the story line is compelling and even borders on believable. This makes it all the more chilling. The book is a bargain for the 32+ hours of listening and the plot is truly a good story. I felt truly satisfied with the ending and the realization that slowly dawned both delighted me and horrified me. It left me wondering if there's a potential for a follow-up novel.

    Thus, I would recommend this one. It wasn't my absolute favorite because there weren't enough logical and likable characters, There were some undercurrents of politics and religion I found a little sour, and the sexual violence felt a bit unnecessarily gratuitous, as though it was just thrown in to horrify the listener. I don't think it really was necessary or enhanced the story in any way. The attempts at romance were a bit flat. However, the plot was truly well-thought and it did a decent job of maintaining momentum. Sands did an excellent job with the narration and Hoffman was good (except for his accents). So, I'd venture that if you like Stephen King and if you like stories with an apocalyptic feel, you'll find your credit well-spent here.

    8 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour ellegreenland
    • ellegreenland
    • 17/09/2019

    Disappointing.

    The narration keeps you listening (both Dominic Hoffman and Xe Sands are outstanding!), but the storyline keeps you fast forwarding with endless descriptions, repetitions, and superflous information. I honestly skipped about 6 hours total, and always knew what was going on. The writing is brilliant in some places, with interesting and unique metaphors, but sadly more often it's mediocre. The characters are like just screen shots of actual persons. They're bland, showing emotion, but in an weirdly stunted ways, like they are AI and programmed to be human, instead of honestly being human. I'd be WAY more mad in some of the circumstances they faced, and they're just kind of ticked-off and oddly detached. The story line is regurgitated from many influencers. Stephen King's "The Stand" is even referenced in the dialogue "This is just like The Stand." Indeed. Even the title is out of sync with the book - the "flock" or "black swan" or even the "shepherds" would be better chosen. This is the only book I've listened to that makes me want an abridged edition.

    13 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Eugenia
    • Eugenia
    • 02/10/2019

    I Can't Believe I Listened To The Whole Thing!

    And it was excruciating.
    Overwritten is an understatement. This Stephen King wannabe had so many "like a..." that it would be impossible to count.
    Examples:
    "His chest heaved like a storm tossed sea."
    and: "DeCarlo made a face like someone pressed a cat turd to his lips, made him kiss it."
    and my personal favorite:
    "...but Matthew caught it between his teeth like a stringy piece of gristle."
    And this bit of fine writing: "...her eye rolls were so vigorous, they could knock a satellite out of orbit."
    And don't get me started on the narrators. Dominic Hoffman with misplaced pauses and slow, endlessly slow narration. And Xe Sands with smiling voice tinged with sarcasm.
    And there's more...SPOILER ALERT (as if it matters): What's with the white mask disease and nanobots or whatever?
    I guess I listened to the whole 32 hours and 22 minutes so that I would know what happened in the end. I want those 32 hours and 22 minutes back.


    12 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Stephanie J
    • Stephanie J
    • 03/07/2019

    Rare thing

    I’m 11 chapters in and I can’t stop listening to this book. It’s thoroughly engaging. The science is fascinating. I really want to know why the sleepwalking is happening. I’m enjoying the heck out of this book.

    38 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Dana
    • Dana
    • 06/11/2019

    Listen to the negative reviews! :(

    Wow, that was a painful 30+ hours. I read and rely on reviews. I should have listened to the negative reviews for this book! The storyline is interesting but is expanded upon WAY too much. At least 20hrs could have been omitted. Had I known of some of the sensitive topics in this book I would have skipped it altogether.

    10 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour William Gardner
    • William Gardner
    • 09/07/2019

    Maybe if Philip K Dick had written The Stand....

    Wow. Intense. A couple intensely dark chapters (e.g. Chapter 50). The story also has a certain level of predictability, seemingly of intentional design, which allows Wendig to throw some PKD-ish twists into the plot that you just don’t see coming. There are s few similarities to Stephen King’s “The Stand”, but end result is more like what might have been if King, Phillip K. Dick, and Wm Gibson had collaborated for one incredible kick-ass story.

    The performances by Hoffman and Sands were very good as well. Sands in particular, does an exceptional job bringing through the character in the female protagonist’s voice.

    Definitely recommend.

    12 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    Trier par :
    Trier par:
    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Bookitty
    • Bookitty
    • 02/11/2019

    It sucks you in and you don't even notice...

    ...until you're halfway through the apocalypse. It wasn't as unpredictable to me as I'd kind of expected from the outset of the previews, in fact as lot of twists and turns the story took were not a surprise to me at all, I saw them coming a mile away. But that didn't take away any of the enjoyment, on the contrary, since in this case the journey is more the destination and it felt like a very simple philosophical question: if the singularity happened, what would it conclude about humanity and our impact onto the world we live in and how would it react to that? thought through to the end along the lines of unshakable, strangely moralistic (while being amoral) logic.
    Everything that happens adheres to that set of parameters, though the way we get there holds some truely innovative narration and is buoyed by a set over flawed and heroic and quintessentially human characters. And watching them on their journey felt like a mindmeld of inevitability, an inescapable narrative pull that created tension not in the way of jumpscares and thriller moments (though there are those) but out of the fundamental struggles the characters face in a very realistic world where there are no good or bad choices, but slightly better and slightly worse ones that lead you to the next set of choices that the characters might make better informed but that don't guarantee success. It's a world that is only one small step removed from ours and that is what gives it the traditional gothic horror feel while also playing to science fiction elements. It's truly a work beyond genre. And the speakers do a marvelous job, filling out many roles that give the world of the story an expansive and deep feel. Listening to it is probably best described as a cinematic experience in scope and you want to really sit down with it and concentrate because it's so rich in details you shouldn't want to miss.

    1 personne a trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      3 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour G. Weiser
    • G. Weiser
    • 25/08/2019

    Too much of everything

    If you are the kind of person who thinks that a cocktail of cocaine, LSD, Heroin and Ecstasy are barely enough to party out, then you might also think this book barely hit the point where it covers enough of the top blockbuster buzzword hot topics.
    I mean, some write a bestseller about genetic experiments. Someone else tries a bestseller about Artificial Intelligence.
    It's hard not to leave a spoiler here, but Wendig obviously tried to not let a sinlge buzzword topic uncovered except colonizing Mars.
    One could think the author had made a bet that he could put more pre- and post apocalyptic topics into his story than any other.
    The credibility of the story of course totally gets burried alongside the road where the wanderers ambulate.
    The ideas lack any scientific basis, the plot turns out somehow not logical at all, i mean, why the heck... well of course i know why: Because it had to happen this way, because otherwise the show wouldn't have gotten on the road.
    But really, sometimes less is simply more.
    And then again: I understand why it's a bestseller.
    It's written in a very entertaining way that keeps you wondering what comes next.
    I wouldn't be surprised if Wendig turned out to be just a pseudonym of Stephen King or another big player.

    2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile