Worst Narration Ever

What would have made The Peripheral better?

A different narrator.

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Lorelei King?

Anyone. She has such a terrible way of speaking for this book. It's so breathy and feels like it should be in a romance novel. It absolutely threw me off and I couldn't listen to anymore of this. I'll get the book on Kindle because I really want to understand the story but I just really can't believe who ever is in charge of getting the narrator though that she was a good choice. It makes me sad because they probably won't get a different narrator either. What a waist of my time and money.

Any additional comments?

Usually I don't put the overall score down because of bad narration but I did in this case because it was such a terrible mis-match that the story was unbearable.

85 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Good story, flat voice actor

Would you try another book from William Gibson and/or Lorelei King?

I love Gibson. This narrator only had two voices, one male and one female. I tried listening to the first hour 4 times until I gave up tonight and wrote this.

Would you be willing to try another one of Lorelei King’s performances?

No.

64 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Narrator ruined it

Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

Yes but only to read. The narrator for this is not a good match.

What didn’t you like about Lorelei King’s performance?

She's is well suited for romance fiction and reads everything in a breathy manner unsuited to this genre and specifically this story. She completely ruined this book for me.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

Yes. But only if Lorelei King has nothing to do with it.

Any additional comments?

Gibson is one of my all time favorite writers. I've enjoyed audio versions of his works up to this point. Please don't use King again for his work. It's a very bad pairing.

57 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Incredibly great across the board

I've been listening to and reading a lot of really good books lately, but this one beats all of them hands down.

I finished reading a widely acclaimed 2014 book last week that had much more publicity and seemed to get a great deal of critical notice (and is probably on the front page of your audible list too), but doesn't even come close to the quality of this one.

That book left me feeling completely unsatisfied and disappointed with the time I spent reading it. Listening to The Peripheral had the complete opposite effect.

Gibson's writing feels as prescient as Neuromancer (which really foretold the creation of the Internet and cyberspace in the 80s), is wonderfully avant-garde and political, but comes across as thoroughly modern and character driven as any of the great HBO shows. It's also more satisfying than anything else I've read, listened to or seen recently.

I really can't recommend this book enough. Total win.

47 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Gibson is great, narrator is unbelievably bad.

It pains me to say this, but while Gibson's work has been and likely always will be incredible (each time in new ways)... the narration of this particular book has nearly ruined the the entire experience. It's taken me just over one month fight through completing this listening. If you have the time and access to the physical book, simply skip the audio book and read it yourself - The Peripheral is worth your time.

46 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

A Tortured Future Gaming the Past

“History had its fascinations, but could be burdensome.”
― William Gibson, The Peripheral

Gibson might not always be the most accurate futurist, but he's probably the glossiest, the most polished. I actually really dig Gibson. I don't think he's perfect. Sometimes his schtick gets worn a little thin, but I loved Neuromancer and really liked his Blue Ant series ('Pattern Recognition', 'Spook Country', 'Zero History'). 'The Peripheral' shares a similar aesthetic with the Blue Ant books, but jumps into the speculative zone that he mastered with the Sprawl trilogy (Neuromancer', 'Count Zero', 'Mona Lisa Overdrive').

'The Peripheral' is set in two futures. One about 30 years from now, and another about 70 years from now. The novel links these two by imagining that through a server in the far future, there is an ability to communicate with the near future. The near future becomes almost a virtual game to the far future. A place where Russian oligarchs and the elite fight tribal wars because they are bored, super rich, and a bit damaged by their own history.

The novel allows Gibson room to explore his favorite issues: technology, paranoia, tribalism, corporatism, information, and mix it with a far future that possesses the ability to indulge their rich 'continua enthusiasts' with an ability to communicate information (not actual time travel) back and forth with their past (our future). That jump/postulation allows Gibson room to riff on how a window a thin window between time allows for the transfer of technology, etc., that can unsettle both economies and nations (duh, but most things that ring true seem almost innately obvious before written down). It also, because it is written by Gibson, lets him verbally play with fabric, fashion, tattoos, and other cultural eccentricities that he seems to always seem to understand a couple decades ahead of the rest of us.

One thing I've noticed about Gibson is his ability to desex his novels. There are both women and men in his novels. Heroes and heroines, but they operate with similar skills and capabilities. They both seem to exist in an androgynous asexual universe that isn't genderless or without sex, but almost seems to exist beyond sex (Postgender?), where gender is almost immaterial; an after thought. Gender exists with Gibson as a hanger to drape a clingy dress or a cashmere coat on and that is about it. Perhaps, this came from his quick uptake on how the cyber world would melt the edges of sexuality. The loss of a body through the Internet or the transference to another body (interacting with the world through a drone or a robot/cyborg) suddenly removes gender all together, or allows for a bunch of different interactions and iterations with gender.

Anyway, if you like speculative fiction, fashion, or just a well-crafted story, you could always do a lot worse than William Gibson. And if his track record is any clue, reading Gibson might just be a window on what ONE stub of our near or far future might look like.

28 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Liked the story but hated the performance

If you could sum up The Peripheral in three words, what would they be?

Like the concept

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Lorelei King?

Hard to say... I really like James Marster from the Dresden Files books but wouldn't use him hear. The performance made it had to listen too

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

nope

Any additional comments?

I

28 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Amazing vision of the future

While swapping between two timeline/realities, an epic battle of wills unfolds. The near future so plausible and so deeply observant of current trends, is brought through the eyes of the unwilling heroine. The farther future is so advanced it's almost anti-cyberpunk, but so logically the next steps past dystopia and entropy where nanotech takes a central role. It's still a frightening and enthralling future; still such a clear path from where we are headed today. The mystery and tension he weaves throughout ratchets up constantly. Never fear the dose of jargon almost every bit is explained somewhere along the wild ride.
Beware the heavy dose of expletives.

20 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Kind of disappointing

I generally like near future speculative fiction (e.g. Stross's Halting State or Gibson's All Tomorrow's Parties and Pattern Recognition) but this book never really grabbed me. The book starts in media res, in a way that is confusing, alienating (since it starts with the most unlikable characters) and weirdly similar to the beginning of Stross's Accelerado. I found it very hard to care about most of the characters. I think Gibson was aiming for noir, but he ended up with a kind of Apple Store shallow gloss. And King's general lack of affect didn't help. I also got very frustrated with the speculative fiction aspect. His information time travel idea opens up all kinds of potential plot complications which are never addressed.

15 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Excellent Book!

This is very good science fiction. Definitely worth a credit. A bit of a challenge to follow in the beginning but it comes together and makes for an interesting and captivating story.

15 personnes ont trouvé cela utile