Votre titre Audible gratuit

9,95 € / mois après 30 jours. Résiliable à tout moment.

ou
Dans le panier

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !

    Description

    Superintelligence asks the questions: What happens when machines surpass humans in general intelligence? Will artificial agents save or destroy us? Nick Bostrom lays the foundation for understanding the future of humanity and intelligent life. The human brain has some capabilities that the brains of other animals lack. It is to these distinctive capabilities that our species owes its dominant position. If machine brains surpassed human brains in general intelligence, then this new superintelligence could become extremely powerful - possibly beyond our control. As the fate of the gorillas now depends more on humans than on the species itself, so would the fate of humankind depend on the actions of the machine superintelligence.

    But we have one advantage: We get to make the first move. Will it be possible to construct a seed Artificial Intelligence, to engineer initial conditions so as to make an intelligence explosion survivable? How could one achieve a controlled detonation?

    This profoundly ambitious and original book breaks down a vast track of difficult intellectual terrain. After an utterly engrossing journey that takes us to the frontiers of thinking about the human condition and the future of intelligent life, we find in Nick Bostrom's work nothing less than a reconceptualization of the essential task of our time.

    PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your My Library section along with the audio.

    ©2014 Nick Bostrom (P)2014 Audible Inc.

    Autres livres audio du même :

    Ce que les auditeurs disent de Superintelligence

    Notations
    Global
    • 3.5 out of 5 stars
    • 5 étoiles
      3
    • 4 étoiles
      6
    • 3 étoiles
      2
    • 2 étoiles
      1
    • 1 étoile
      3
    Interprétation
    • 3.5 out of 5 stars
    • 5 étoiles
      4
    • 4 étoiles
      2
    • 3 étoiles
      3
    • 2 étoiles
      2
    • 1 étoile
      2
    Histoire
    • 3.5 out of 5 stars
    • 5 étoiles
      2
    • 4 étoiles
      4
    • 3 étoiles
      5
    • 2 étoiles
      1
    • 1 étoile
      1

    Commentaires - Veuillez sélectionner les onglets ci-dessous pour changer la provenance des commentaires.

    Trier par :
    Trier par:
    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars

    Must read in AI


    Well-read, seriously researched book on the existential risk posed by developments in artificial intelligence.

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    • DB
    • 27/08/2017

    Not as exciting as expected

    I was disappointed by this book that everybody seems to like and recommend. Rather than giving a personal vision of the future it explores all the possible futures in a rather dystopian way. The style is also quite boring.

    Trier par :
    Trier par:
    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Gary
    • Gary
    • 12/09/2014

    Colossus: The Forbin Project is coming

    This book is more frightening than any book you'll ever read. The author makes a great case for what the future holds for us humans. I believe the concepts in "The Singularity is Near" by Ray Kurzweil are mostly spot on, but the one area Kurzweil dismisses prematurely is how the SI (superintelligent advanced artificial intelligence) entity will react to its circumstances.

    The book doesn't really dwell much on how the SI will be created. The author mostly assumes a computer algorithm of some kind with perhaps human brain enhancements. If you reject such an SI entity prima facie this book is not for you, since the book mostly deals with assuming such a recursive self aware and self improving entity will be in humanities future.

    The author makes some incredibly good points. He mostly hypothesizes that the SI entity will be a singleton and not allow others of its kind to be created independently and will happen on a much faster timeline after certain milestones are fulfilled.

    The book points out how hard it is to put safeguards into a procedure to guard against unintended consequences. For example, making 'the greater good for the greatest many' the final goal can lead to unintended consequence such as allowing a Nazi ruled world (he doesn't give that example directly in the book, and I borrow it from Karl Popper who gave it as a refutation for John Stuart Mill's utilitarian philosophy). If the goal is to make us all smile, the SI entity might make brain probes that force us to smile. There is no easy end goal specifiable without unintended consequences.

    This kind of thinking within the book is another reason I can recommend the book. As I was listening, I realized that all the ways we try to motivate or control an SI entity to be moral can also be applied to us humans in order to make us moral to. Morality is hard both for us humans and for future SI entities.

    There's a movie from the early 70s called "Colossus: The Forbin Project", it really is a template for this book, and I would recommend watching the movie before reading this book.

    I just recently listened to the book, "Our Final Invention" by James Barrat. That book covers the same material that is presented in this book. This book is much better even though they overlap very much. The reason why is this author, Nick Bostrom, is a philosopher and knows how to lay out his premises in such a way that the story he is telling is consistent, coherent, and gives a narrative to tie the pieces together (even if the narrative will scare the daylights out of the listener).

    This author has really thought about the problems inherent in an SI entity, and this book will be a template for almost all future books on this subject.

    156 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Kendra
    • Kendra
    • 24/09/2014

    A must read that must be read slowly

    There is not much math in this book, not many pictures or tables. Usually this is a good indicator that I'll be able to follow along in an audio version. That was not true of this book. I listen to audiobooks while doing menial tasks involving infrequent and brief moments of concentration, with most books I am able to do this easily, but this book requires some pondering and digestion. Any distraction seemed to be enough to miss something important. Perhaps some of this was due to narrator's smooth baratone which - for reasons I don't know - I didn't like. I plan on getting the hard copy and reading this one in silence. This book is definitely a must read, but it also seems it must be read slowly. Put it down, think about it, talk about it with your friends, then and only then on to the next chapter.

    129 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Amazon Customer
    • Amazon Customer
    • 23/01/2018

    It’s a grind

    I wasn’t sure how to rate this title, as the actual information found here is the most complete source on the subject matter. However, it is seriously tough to get through. The narrators tone is dull and rather monotone, which is doubly unfortunate as it almost feels like he is reading one long, book sized list of highly technical jargon, specifically designed to lose lamen like myself. This seems like a title it would be better to have a hard copy of, in order to study from, as the combination of the authors writing style and the narrators performance does not make for easy listening.

    14 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Brendan
    • Brendan
    • 26/06/2016

    Book About AI Narrated By AI

    I've maintained something of an interest in AI and decided that this book would allow me to go a bit more in-depth. Nope. Whatever degree is required to maintain and understand the analysis that Bostrom puts forward is one that I clearly like. What I mean to say is that Superintelligence is drier than the Sahara and faaaar too long! Worst of all, the narration actually sounds robotic. Bad book, bad narration, bad choice.

    29 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Matthew
    • Matthew
    • 27/08/2015

    Interesting for sure, but kind of boring

    Any additional comments?

    Every chapter is more or less the author proposing an idea/prediction, and then exhaustively defining and constraining the solution space for that idea. .e.g AI could be done via method X, which would enable A, B, C, D, but would exclude J, K, L, M, N, etc..

    Except for that's done over an hour.

    So, every detail is treated very well, and it's an interesting process, but near the end I just couldn't take it any more and had to skip parts. :)

    34 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Gregory Collier
    • Gregory Collier
    • 09/12/2014

    Pretty hard to listen to for more than a short tim

    Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

    I wish it was, but it only takes a couple of minutes before my mind starts wandering and the narrator is just idle background noise.

    Would you be willing to try another one of Napoleon Ryan’s performances?

    Probably not.

    Did Superintelligence inspire you to do anything?

    Read the book instead of listen to it.

    Any additional comments?

    The narrator speaks clearly and eloquently but the tone and meter were just impossible for me to enjoy. He didn't appear to be at all interested or passionate about the subject matter and instead just sounded like he was reading a script full of Star Trek technobabble and was just completely bored.

    39 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      3 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour David
    • David
    • 26/07/2015

    Thorough, With a Mix of Excellence and Other

    The book is worth the listen because it is a very good and thorough exposition of one of the major technological problems and risks approaching us in the very near future. Anything that can bring Popular awareness of this and similar issues is a great value.

    On the down side the author is so committed to voicing the scholarly non-committal tone that he fails to make definite statements about any topic, even when he could do so.

    At times there are logical fallacies in the arguments, and assumptions about the nature of Artificial Intelligences that appear to be groundless, and are not supported by explanation.

    There is also a tendency to quote and rely on a variety of "Celebrity" Experts, who have track records in Technology that more recently have led them down allies of almost clownish obsolescence in one case, and over-confidence leading to fallacies and mistakes in their work in the other case.

    I would not take this book as 'gospel' on Super-Intelligence. Rather it is a worthwhile entry into the current fieldwork on the subject, such as it is.


    14 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour M. Shivas
    • M. Shivas
    • 02/03/2016

    Speculation masquerading as Science

    What disappointed you about Superintelligence?

    The majority of Nick Bostrom's "SuperIntelligence" is conjecture, and much of it is not credible. The narrative lifts off from a thin crust of scientific fact then tail-spins into unimaginative speculation: some AI projects might advance faster than others; governments would seek to gain control if they thought AI would present a strategic advantage; an AI might become so powerful so fast it could take over the world, resulting in a "singleton" new world order, etc. The book reads like an index of unmoving science fiction premises rather than a thought-provoking expedition over the landscape of possibility.

    The author attempts to capture the complex challenges underpinning the development of Artificial Intelligence under the umbrella term "recalcitrance". This leads to absurd simplifications like "Rate of change in intelligence equals optimization power over recalcitrance" on which he bases his theories of an AI "explosion". One of the countless implausible possibilities the author describes is that AI projects could be moved to the cloud, as if they could be scaled as easily as websites.

    What do you think your next listen will be?

    Emperor of all Maladies

    Have you listened to any of Napoleon Ryan’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

    SuperIntelligence is rich with phrases like "neurotoxic pollutants" that Napoleon Ryan pronounces with an educated bearing that fits the narrative's imperious tone. The book sounds as if it were written, published and narrated by Orwell's Ministry of Information. The section that describes parental attitudes to improving children's intelligence via genetics is particularly callous.

    What character would you cut from Superintelligence?

    The author

    Any additional comments?

    One memorable insight revealed is that pundits who predict the creation of an Artificial Intelligence "within twenty years" are safe in the knowledge that their careers will be over by the time their predictions are proved wrong. We can hope that Bostrom's AI explosion results in robots that can write books more credible, and less soulless, than this.

    33 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Kevin
    • Kevin
    • 26/03/2020

    Lousy and pretentious

    If the title sounds great, the author tried too hard to make it a savant book.
    He explains at the beginning that it’s not going to be an easy book but what could have been done in much simpler wording, is a soup of useless technical words and long rhetorical sentences.
    It’s like instead of saying “yes” to a simple answer you would say: “I agree with the following principles inherent to your question!”
    The topic is good but the way it’s written and narrated is just boring, confusing and makes you wonder if there is a start or an end to every chapter...

    3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Marcos Yudi Yamamoto
    • Marcos Yudi Yamamoto
    • 11/01/2018

    Bad audio

    Audio is surprisingly bad. Seems like the microphone was swallowed!
    Story is very good though!

    3 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    Trier par :
    Trier par:
    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      3 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Vidar Andersen
    • Vidar Andersen
    • 15/04/2016

    Probably great content, performance renders it near insufferable to listen

    It sounds like the narrator has put a bucket on his head and unfortunately it is additionally read in a staccato fashion making each and every sentence sound exactly the same. Not the quality level I'd expect from an Audible audiobook.

    16 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour laptop tisch besitzer
    • laptop tisch besitzer
    • 03/10/2016

    the sound quality is really bad.

    the sound quality is really bad. They should consider to record this again with better quality.

    7 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      3 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Gerd
    • Gerd
    • 07/11/2016

    Interessant aber manchmal fade und hypothetisch

    Eigentlich ein sehr interessantes Thema. Unsere Gesellschaft muss sich rechtzeitig Gedanken darüber machen, wie man eine KI so erschafft, dass sie kontrollierbar bleibt, selbst wenn sie schlauer wird als wir. Tun wir das nicht rechtzeitig und ausgiebig genug, könnte die Erfindung einer solchen KI das letzte Ereignis in der Geschichte der Menschheit sein. Das Buch zeigt verschiedene mögliche Arten, wie eine solche KI entwickelt werden könnte, wie der Übergang in eine Gesellschaft mit künstlicher Intelligenz ablaufen könnte und wie man diese Vorgänge in gewissem Maße sicher machen könnte.
    Das ist so weit ganz spannend, serviert wird das jedoch teilweise in mathematischen Ausschweifungen und oder in so hypothetischen Szenarien, dass es mir schwer gefallen ist, das Buch zu hören und ich die letzten beiden Kapitel komplett ausgelassen habe (obwohl ich das Thema unheimlich spannend finde). Zwar ist das Thema wirklich wichtig und viele der gezeigten Probleme und Lösungsansätze sind durchaus hilfreich. Trotzdem wirkt es an vielen Stellen so, als würde der Erfinder der Dampfmaschine über Probleme in der Formel 1 philosophieren. Wir sind heute noch so weit davon entfernt eine brauchbare KI zu entwickeln, die es auch wert ist als intelligent bezeichnet zu werden, dass wir nur wild spekulieren können, wie so etwas funktionieren kann. Da erscheint es mir wenig zielführend Kapitel über Kapitel auf eben diesen Spekulationen aufzubauen ohne dass wirklich viel heraus kommt...

    5 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      2 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Reimfloh
    • Reimfloh
    • 30/10/2017

    Buzzword Sammlung

    Eine kaum zu ertragende Aneinanderreihung von Buzzwords. Der Sprecher schafft es kaum den Text zu erzählen. Stattdessen folgt Aufzählung auf Aufzählung. Auch die ständigen Wortwiederholungen trüben den Hörgenuß. Mein erstes und bisher einziges Hörbuch das ich aufgegeben und nicht beendet habe. Schade, das Forschungsgebiet ist an und für sich sehr spannend.

    2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      4 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Lutz & Ploy
    • Lutz & Ploy
    • 26/09/2018

    thought-provoking (in parts)

    In parts quite interesting and thought-provoking. Some chapters are a bit long-winded considering their hypothetical nature. Sound quality not terrific.

    1 personne a trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Amazon Customer
    • Amazon Customer
    • 03/07/2017

    mind blowingly numbing - Andrew Finn

    And he was right. You cannot hear this in one sessions. But if you are into this topic you will not regret have listened to this book.
    Very detailed, very patiently laid out overview of artificial intelligence and the control problem. Good .. read ...

    1 personne a trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      2 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Birgit
    • Birgit
    • 28/10/2016

    Important Issue, annoying speaker

    well written by the very clear thinker nick bostrom, who manages to provide insight for a wide range of topics relevant for AI.
    Deserves a better speaker though.

    1 personne a trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      3 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour pitpat
    • pitpat
    • 19/08/2016

    Too important to be this bulky

    Ok, I get it, the author comes from a very academic origin. But this is too much. This book is good, really, if you invest some brain energy and if you try to be a critic who needs to be persuaded by logical proof reasoning.

    But it deserves a rewrite. A real layman's rewrite with clearer statements, cut by at least 25 percent and with more examples. Oh wait, that rewrite is already done. Read waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html

    But then also by this audio book to reward the author for his work :)

    1 personne a trouvé cela utile

    • Global
      1 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      1 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour MI
    • MI
    • 24/02/2021

    Arguments with more holes than a fine Gorgombert

    This book attempts to present which form superintelligent systems might take and how we might achieve them. It then proceeds to lay out the dangers of such systems and possible solutions, although I have not reached the solutions since I returned the book after listening to 2/3 of it.

    The main problems of this book for me are the numerous unquestioned assumptions it hides paired with its vagueness and many inconsistencies.
    Here are two of the larger such assumptions:
    - Why would machine-based AI retain all the properties (massive storage, high clock rates) of current computers? Current results from AI research have taught us about "catastrophic forgetting" and increased inference times for larger models. This point is not addressed in the book, instead it is implicitly assumed to be true since the super AI would "run on machine hardware"
    - Why would a superintelligence be effectively omniscient? The Pareto principle and chaos theory are still a thing. Also, the book never considers how such a superintelligence would acquire knowledge. Just "reading everything on the internet" will not be enough to be omniscient. Causality research shows us that it is not enough to merely observe things to deduce causal relationships you also need interventions, which is not possible in the internet wisdom case.
    There are many more such examples throughout the book.

    Another glaring point of criticism is that the book does not event try to define its main subject. Under the weak premise of "not wanting to be bogged down in semantics" the book never characterizes what a superintelligence is apart from it being "superior to any human in the relevant tasks" (whatever those tasks are and how many they are). This includes anything from something that is slightly faster at inference to God. And everything is conflated into a single concept and presented as inevitable.

    Save yourself the time, this book is not worth listening to in my opinion.

    • Global
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Interprétation
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Histoire
      5 out of 5 stars
    Image de profile pour Christian
    • Christian
    • 27/09/2020

    Insightful book about Superintelligence

    Probably already a bit out of date but the main thought and concepts still hold. Interesting to see how OpenAI develops too.