Audio Skips!!

Any additional comments?

The audio sounds like it was ripped from a scratched CD. At first it's only occasional, a minor annoyance. Later, though, it becomes more frequent, to the point where sentences and paragraphs can't be made out.

I've tried it on different devices, and the skips are in the same place, so the problem is on Audible's end.

I tried contacting them but have received no response. They're doing this excellent book, and their customers, a disservice by not re-uploading proper audio

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

66 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

This is a great book. However the audio skips!

What would have made Citizens better?

Fix the audio. I am reluctant to return this book as I really want to listen to it. However, the skipping of the audio becomes more and more annoying over time.

Any additional comments?

Please fix the audio on this book! It is a real disservice to the consumers who purchase this book.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

33 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Recording flaws

This recording was obviously made by tranferring audio from a set of vinyl record disks. Whoever did it must not have cared or paid much attention. The needle skipped hundreds of times. Each skip abridged the reading by about 8 words. So much was missing in parts, I couldn't really understand the material. Why the attrociuous lack of quality control?

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

29 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Why is the skipping not fixed after five years?

Though I don't think it's a great book, I do believe this is the best available history of the French Revolution on Audible. Otherwise, I would have returned it because it is defective.

My question is for Audible: Why has this audiobook been allowed to remain on sale for five years when it is obviously defective? Why has it not been fixed? I thought Amazon was all about the customer? I used a credit on this and it doesn't sit well with me...

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

28 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Warning!

This audiobook seems to have suffered from a bad recording or transfer and skips quite frequently! I’ve tried on two devices, but I think it’s the recording itself!

Buyer beware!

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

19 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Savage

Schama emphasizes the great personalities involved in the French Revolution: this is the place to go for full portraits of the vacillating but sometimes courageous Louis XVI; for the puritanical Robespierre; the devilish Marat, with his repulsive skin disease; and calculating opportunists like Talleyrand.

It's also the place to go for stomach-churning descriptions of mob violence. I'm writing this in the wake of recent terrorist attacks in Paris; and I hesitate to say this because of the timing, but Paris is no stranger to the savage violence of the mob on people perceived as enemies. Once killed by a Paris mob, the victim's body was likely to be torn apart - literally - with parts paraded around the city on the ends of pikes. Heads were being removed as trophies by ordinary people for years before the guillotine made the process systematic.

The king was at Versailles; a mob stormed the palace, killed and beheaded his defenders, and forced him to move to his palace in the city, the Tuilleries, where they could keep an eye on him. Later that palace was stormed by a mob, who killed and beheaded his defenders, and forced him to take refuge elsewhere. Later still, this place of refuge was stormed again, with even worse butchery, and he was tried and condemned to the guillotine.

Schama doesn't focus exclusively on this aspect of the revolution. He gives full play to the political history of the various factions: the Montagnards, the Girondins, the Jacobins; and to the successive waves of political and sometimes physical extermination carried out by one faction against another. The Revolution was self-consciously symbolic and declamatory, and it made for magnificent "scenes" of political debate.

It's a long, fascinating account, whose only fault is that it ends rather abruptly after the death of Robespierre. There's a summing up of what happened to who, but less attention to what - if anything - it all meant. Frederick Davidson gives his usual sterling performance. (Davidson, as I've said many times, is an acquired taste: IF you've acquired the taste, the book is a great pleasure to listen to. He has an unerring instinct for character, given less free rein here than in his readings of fiction, but still in evidence.)

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

19 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Great introduction, horrible narration

Would you listen to Citizens again? Why?

The United States in the 1980s is probably sufficiently distant from France in the late 1700s to provide a balanced look at the important events of that time and place. This book provides a great overview and lots of context, and Schama never looks away from atrocities committed by either side. Citizens is also obviously a product of the late 1980s in its scepticism towards economic regulations.

What did you like best about this story?

The best part of Citizens is the wealth of context it provides in explaining what made the revolution happen and how French society was affected.

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Frederick Davidson?

While Frederick Davidson's tendency to come across as smug and sarcastic is certainly a flaw, his complete inability to pronounce French names and terms is almost enough to be a dealbreaker. His awful pronunciation isn't even consistent. Marat's murderer's name was Charlotte Corday, but Davidson pronounces it Cordaille just as often as Corday. Now, her name is a familiar one, but the problem becomes real when the listener can't tell if Davidson is referring to a man alternately as Beaulieu and Boileau, or if they are indeed two different men.

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

Since reading (listening to) Hilary Mantel's A Place of Greater Safety, Danton's execution has never failed to get me.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

14 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Damaged copy

Doesn’t play correctly, skips syllables every minute or so. Extremely distracting to listen to. Charming performance if only it played back properly.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

10 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

The French Revolution:Another View

Simon Schama is one of the best writers of popular history, but is ill-served by the narrator, who switches back and forth between men' and women's voices, French and German accents and editorializing sarcasm in a distracting pseudo-theatricality. I struggled to finish, and have yet to do so!

Schama's other titles, such as Rembrandt’s Eyes or The Embarrassment of Riches –no less meticulously researched—were a joy to discover, and both were read more than once.

Which is why Davidson's sophomoric reading is like listening to a second or third rate Hamlet, winking at the audience. One is tempted to throw tomatoes.

Gamely, I will persevere because Schama's is a refreshing voice, in the noisy forest of scholarship. Hopefully, the reader might be persuaded to re-record some of his more sarcastic chapters, and we can hear the writer's own words clearly.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

10 personnes ont trouvé cela utile

Great book, awful audiobook

What disappointed you about Citizens?

The audio quality, for what is a great book, is embarrassing. Between audio that skips throughout, a low quality recording, and audio artifacting, it's nearly unlistenable.

How did the narrator detract from the book?

The narrator does a fine job himself. It's the circumstances around the audio that is the problem. Periodically the recording just skips forward or backwards at a whim. The recording ranges from quiet to very loud at a moments notice, especially when the narrator hits a plossive. And any time a soft 's' is emphasized it's ear splitting.

Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !

8 personnes ont trouvé cela utile