Carte Blanche
The Erosion of Medical Consent
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
3 mois d'Audible Standard gratuits
3 mois pour 0,00 €/mois, puis 5,99 €/mois. Possibilité de résilier chaque mois.
L'offre prend fin le 15 Juillet 2026 à 23 h 59.
Carte Blanche
Lu par :
William DeMeritt
Acheter pour 14,99 €
-
Lu par :
-
William DeMeritt
-
De :
-
Harriet Washington
This medical right that we have long taken for granted was first sacrificed on the altar of military expediency in 1990 when the Department of Defense asked for and received from the FDA a waiver that permitted it to force an experimental anthrax vaccine on the ranks of ground troops headed for the Persian Gulf. Since then, the military has pressed ahead to impose nonconsensual testing of the blood substitute PolyHeme in civilian urbanities, quietly enrolling more than 20,000 non-consenting subjects since 2005. Most Americans think that their right to give or withhold consent is protected by law, but the passing in 1996 of modifications to the Code of Federal Regulations, such as statute CFR 21 50.24, now permit investigators to conduct research wtih trauma victims without their consent or event their knowledge. More than a dozen studies since have used the 1996 loophole to recruit large numbers of subjects without their knowledge. The erosion of consent is the result of a U.S. medical-research system that has proven again and again that it cannot be trusted.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment