Episode 68: Evaluating Procedural Fairness in Court and on Zoom

Impossible d'ajouter des articles

Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Impossible de suivre le podcast

Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast

Episode 68: Evaluating Procedural Fairness in Court and on Zoom

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails

Self-represented litigants primarily measure procedural justice by whether they had a voice, were listened to, and were treated fairly in court. Do these basic marks of overall satisfaction differ between the mode in which the hearing took place though? This week's Proof Over Precedent episode features an interview with justice reform consultant Emily LaGratta and Nathanael Player, former director of the Utah State Court Self-Help Center, about a study looking at litigants' perception of fairness in their respective experiences with either remote or in-person court.

Aucun commentaire pour le moment