Couverture de What's the Scenario? with PLRB

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

De : PLRB
Écouter gratuitement

Formerly "PLRB on Demand", this podcast feed is being rebooted as "What's the Scenario? with PLRB." Each week you'll find a 20-minute episode that addresses a claims or coverage scenario and answers interesting insurance questions. Our PLRB team of Alissha Watley, Mike Brode, and Tim Havlir will discuss terrorism, pandemics, fireworks, NFTs, aggressive contractors, phone scams, matching, vacation rentals, and more. Stay subscribed to this feed and check back in the new year for a new podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast Your Podcast App - Please subscribe and rate us on your favorite podcast app YouTube - Please like and subscribe at youtube.com/@plrb/ LinkedIn - Please follow at "Property and Liability Resource Bureau" Send us your scenario! Please reach out to us with your scenario! This could be your "adjuster story" sharing a situation from your claims experience, or a burning question you would like the team to answer. In any case, please omit any personal information as we will anonymize your story before we share. Just reach out to scenario@plrb.org. If you send us an audio clip, we may use the audio in the show, though again we will only include material we can anonymize. Legal Information The views and opinions expressed in this resource are those of the individual speaker and not necessarily those of the Property & Liability Resource Bureau (PLRB), its membership, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. The information, ideas, and opinions are presented as information only and not as legal advice or offers of representation. Individual policy language and state laws vary, and listeners should rely on guidance from their companies and counsel as appropriate.Copyright 2024 PLRB. Economie
Épisodes
  • Playing Defense Against Negligence Claims
    Jul 3 2026

    During a recreational adult hockey league practice, the goalie skated backward into the crease after a drill and grabbed the top crossbar of the net while stretching and joking with other players. The ice had recently been resurfaced, and the net had not yet been properly secured to the ice. As the goalie leaned his body weight onto the frame, the goal tipped backward and struck him. In a negligence claim between the goalie and the arena, which team takes the blame?

    Notable Timestamps

    [ 01:03 ] - Establishing negligence requires meeting four elements, which include having a duty owed, a breach of that duty, a proximately caused injury, and damages.

    [ 02:20 ] - Even when negligence is successfully established during litigation, there are still potential defenses available, such as assumption of risk and contributory negligence.

    [ 04:50 ] - The assumption of risk doctrine might still apply even if a player is violating a rule during a game, as participants generally expect potential injury during physical activities.

    [ 07:11 ] - Some states utilize contributory negligence, which can technically bar a plaintiff from any recovery if they are found to have contributed at all to the incident.

    [ 11:03 ] - Comparative negligence rules vary, with some states allowing recovery if a person is up to 50% liable, while others require the individual's negligence to be 49% or less.

    [ 11:51 ] - Under a pure comparative standard, an injured person who is found to be 90% at fault for an incident can still recover the remaining 10% of their respective damages.

    [ 14:34 ] - In cases involving severe injuries, juries can sometimes be influenced to make decisions inconsistent with the letter of the law.

    [ 16:29 ] - The outcomes of these negligence defenses heavily depend on the specific state where the case is taking place, the laws that apply, and the overall makeup of the jury pool.

    Your PLRB Resources

    Negotiation Strategies in Bodily Injury Claims
    https://members.plrb.org/education/courses/negotiation-strategies-in-bodily-injury-claims

    Employees of member companies also have access to a searchable legal database, hundreds of hours of video trainings, building code materials, weather data, and even the ability to have your coverage questions answered by our team of attorneys (https://www.plrb.org/ask-plrb/) at no additional charge to you or your company.

    Subscribe to this Podcast

    Your Podcast App - Please subscribe and rate us on your favorite podcast app

    YouTube - Please like and subscribe at @plrb

    LinkedIN - Please follow at "Property and Liability Resource Bureau"

    Send us your Scenario!

    Please reach out to us at 630-509-8704 with your scenario! This could be your "adjuster story" sharing a situation from your claims experience, or a burning question you would like the team to answer. In any case, please omit any personal information as we will anonymize your story before we share. Just reach out to scenario@plrb.org.

    Legal Information

    The views and opinions expressed in this resource are those of the individual speaker and not necessarily those of the Property & Liability Resource Bureau (PLRB), its membership, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. The information, ideas, and opinions are presented as information only and not as legal advice or offers of representation. Individual policy language and state laws vary, and listeners should rely on guidance from their companies and counsel as appropriate.

    Music: "Piece of Future" by Keyframe_Audio. Pixabay. Pixabay License.
    Font: Metropolis by Chris Simpson. SIL OFL 1.1.
    Icons: FontAwesome (SIL OFL 1.1) and Noun Project (royalty-free licenses purchased via subscription).
    Sound Effects: Pixabay (Pixabay License) and Freesound.org (CC0).

    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    19 min
  • [REPLAY] My Son Set Off Fireworks in My House
    Jun 26 2026
    As we hit our next holiday week and listen to the sounds of fireworks, we'd like to share a classic episode featuring the insurance implications of fireworks. So fire up the grill, and put this episode on the speakers. Is there an exclusion for stupid? Join Alissha, Mike, and Tim to discuss bad decisions, wedding rings stuck on fingers, dumpster fires, and whether the choice to set off a firework inside a house is considered "intentional" under the policy. Notable Timestamps [ 00:17 ] - The insured's son set off a firework in the house for the excitement, causing fire damage. The homeowners file a property claim. [ 01:26 ] - Alissha, Mike, and Tim discuss their opinions on fireworks, sneaking over the state line, exploding toys, dog ownership, and dumpster fires. [ 04:12 ] - There's no exclusion for "stupid" (i.e. negligence), at least not prior to the loss. [ 07:34 ] - There is an exclusion for intentional loss. "Intent" usually applies both when the actor intends the consequence, and when they know the consequences are substantially certain to result. [ 08:46 ] - The fact that the son was intoxicated would not establish an insanity defense. [ 10:36 ] - The son was living in the house, even though he spent much of the year at college, and would be considered an insured so no subrogation is possible. [ 11:50 ] - For very young children, their young age can imply that they are not appreciating the consequences of their actions and that can speak to intent. [ 13:04 ] - The team discusses scenarios where an adult intentionally set a fire so that her husband could heroically put it out, where someone breaks a ring to get it off their swelling finger, and where someone smashes a window to break into their own house. [ 17:24 ] - Tim provides a recap of the scenario and the points above. Your PLRB Resources Homeowners annotation on the intentional loss exclusion - https://search.plrb.org/?dn=37&src=gsa Does a Farm Policy Cover Injury to a Semi Driver Caused by Water Balloons Tossed from Insured's Vehicle? - https://search.plrb.org/?dn=17362&src=gsa Cutting Off Ring That is Stuck On Swollen Finger… Intentional Loss? - https://search.plrb.org/?dn=67944&src=gsa Is Damage to Property of Others Coverage Available Under a Homeowners Policy for a Window Broken by the Insured Tenant's Son at a Rental Property? - https://search.plrb.org/?dn=73010&src=gsa CE course on Intentional Versus Negligent Conduct For Casualty Adjusters - https://www.plrb.org/public2/dislearn/description.cfm?mod=p0056 CE course on Subrogation Claims - https://www.plrb.org/public2/dislearn/description.cfm?mod=p0050 Webinar on Fire Loss Investigation Strategies - https://www.plrb.org/distlearn/webinars/vplayer.cfm?vid=w0024 Employees of member companies also have access to a searchable legal database, hundreds of hours of video trainings, building code materials, weather data, and even the ability to have your coverage questions answered by our team of attorneys (https://www.plrb.org/container.cfm?conlink=sec/cq/default.cfm) at no additional charge to you or your company. Subscribe to this Podcast Your Podcast App - Please subscribe and rate us on your favorite podcast app YouTube - Please like and subscribe at @plrb LinkedIN - Please follow at "Property and Liability Resource Bureau" Send us your Scenario! Please reach out to us with your scenario! This could be your "adjuster story" sharing a situation from your claims experience, or a burning question you would like the team to answer. In any case, please omit any personal information as we will anonymize your story before we share. Just reach out to scenario@plrb.org. Legal Information The views and opinions expressed in this resource are those of the individual speaker and not necessarily those of the Property & Liability Resource Bureau (PLRB), its membership, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. The information, ideas, and opinions are presented as information only and not as legal advice or offers of representation. Individual policy language and state laws vary, and listeners should rely on guidance from their companies and counsel as appropriate. Music: "Piece of Future" by Keyframe_Audio. Pixabay. Pixabay License. Font: Metropolis by Chris Simpson. SIL OFL 1.1. Icons: FontAwesome (SIL OFL 1.1) and Noun Project (royalty-free licenses purchased via subscription). Sound Effects: Pixabay (Pixabay License) and Freesound.org (CC0). https://thenounproject.com/icon/firework-152487/ https://thenounproject.com/icon/firework-1758560/
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    21 min
  • When the Claims Executive Became the Claimant
    Jun 19 2026

    As a claims executive leader, Awais Farooq built and oversaw coverage frameworks, liability investigations, reserve governance, and total loss protocols. He believed that institutional fluency would make his own claim predictable. Then he struck a deer on his motorcycle and suffered a significant leg injury. His claim was segmented across bodily injury, property damage, and total loss. Each function operated correctly. Yet without a single point of ownership, the experience felt operationally sound but emotionally fragmented.

    Notable Timestamps

    [ 00:37 ] - Awais Farooq experienced a motorcycle accident that resulted in a claim that was handled with operational soundness but felt entirely emotionally fragmented.

    [ 04:29 ] - The accident occurred close to home when Awais encountered a deer on the road, attempted to turn around to avoid it, but unfortunately crashed into another deer.

    [ 06:24 ] - Despite the insurance company being highly digitally advanced with text message communications, Awais had to navigate three separate adjusters who did not communicate with one another.

    [ 08:01 ] - A major gap exists in the insurance industry where automation and process improvements often overlook the end consumer, losing track of the primary goal to restore the person completely.

    [ 12:52 ] - Awais channeled his frustrations into writing a book titled The Future Isn't Fully Automated, which explores how technology must integrate with essential human connection in claims.

    [ 13:39 ] - The claims journey consists of information gathering, documentation, and decisioning; streamlining the first two phases can empower adjusters to focus primarily on delivering decisions.

    [ 15:00 ] - Awais discusses the possibility of an individualized user experience akin to Amazon, ensuring that claimants have a single point of contact rather than feeling like one of millions of claims.

    [ 17:00 ] - A technically compliant claim can still fail the human experience test.

    Your PLRB Resources

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/awais-farooq/

    Subscribe to this Podcast

    Your Podcast App - Please subscribe and rate us on your favorite podcast app

    YouTube - Please like and subscribe at @plrb

    LinkedIN - Please follow at "Property and Liability Resource Bureau"

    Send us your Scenario!

    Please reach out to us at 630-509-8704 with your scenario! This could be your "adjuster story" sharing a situation from your claims experience, or a burning question you would like the team to answer. In any case, please omit any personal information as we will anonymize your story before we share. Just reach out to scenario@plrb.org.

    Legal Information

    The views and opinions expressed in this resource are those of the individual speaker and not necessarily those of the Property & Liability Resource Bureau (PLRB), its membership, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. The information, ideas, and opinions are presented as information only and not as legal advice or offers of representation. Individual policy language and state laws vary, and listeners should rely on guidance from their companies and counsel as appropriate.

    Music: "Piece of Future" by Keyframe_Audio. Pixabay. Pixabay License.
    Font: Metropolis by Chris Simpson. SIL OFL 1.1.
    Icons: FontAwesome (SIL OFL 1.1) and Noun Project (royalty-free licenses purchased via subscription).
    Sound Effects: Pixabay (Pixabay License) and Freesound.org (CC0).

    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    19 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Aucun commentaire pour le moment