Vetting Sponsors Part 3: Key RED FLAGS to Watch for in Sponsors!
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Désolé, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'ajouter l'article car votre panier est déjà plein.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
-
Lu par :
-
De :
À propos de ce contenu audio
📌 Episode Overview
In Part 3 of the Vetting Sponsors series, Jason Williams and Frank Patalano dive deep into one of the most overlooked, but critical, areas of passive investing: fee transparency and sponsor communication. This episode breaks down common fee structures, how they’re sometimes misrepresented, and why clarity matters more than ever in today’s market.
🧠 Topics Covered
- Why transparency around fees is non-negotiable
- Acquisition fees: what’s reasonable vs. misleading
- Asset management fees and how they’re actually calculated
- The dangers of raising multiple years of fees upfront
- Disposition and refinance fees explained
- Capital calls: legitimate reasons vs. red flags
- Dilution vs. investor loans during capital shortfalls
- Common communication breakdowns between GPs and LPs
- Why “everything is in the portal” is not an answer
- Red flags when sponsors avoid direct questions
- Green flags that signal strong, trustworthy sponsor teams
- The importance of underwriting access and investor education
- Why experienced sponsors openly discuss past failures
💬 Notable Quotes
- “Fees are okay. Hiding them is not.”
- “Over-communication is always better than under-communication.”
- “There are no failures, only feedback, if you’re honest and willing to improve.”
🎧 Connect with Jason:
✅ https://IroncladUnderwriting.com
✅Linktree
🎧 Connect with Frank:
Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
Aucun commentaire pour le moment