Couverture de Verdict with Ted Cruz

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Verdict with Ted Cruz

De : Premiere Networks
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de ce contenu audio

Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country. "Verdict with Ted Cruz" is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 2022, Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.

2026 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia Politique et gouvernement Sciences politiques
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Épisodes
    • Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen

      Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen
      Feb 11 2026
      1. The Case at the Supreme Court The case is Trump v. Vos Selections, argued on Nov. 5, 2025.Small businesses are challenging Trump-era tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 2. Central Legal Questions Does IEEPA’s power to “regulate imports” include authority to impose tariffs?Did Congress delegate too much taxing authority to the President?→ This triggers two major constitutional doctrines: Non‑Delegation Doctrine – Congress cannot hand over core lawmaking powers (like taxation) without clear limits.Major Questions Doctrine – Major economic or political actions require explicit congressional authorization. 3. Constitutional Tension Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to: Lay and collect taxes/tariffsRegulate commerce with foreign nations Tariffs sit at the intersection of foreign policy (executive power) and taxation (legislative power). 4. Oral Argument Themes Justices skeptical of Trump’s argument: Roberts – Concerned tariffs are fundamentally taxes on Americans, which is Congress’s domain.Gorsuch & Barrett – Pressed the need for clear statutory limits; worried about unchecked executive authority. Justices leaning toward upholding the tariffs: Kavanaugh – Emphasized long history of broad presidential discretion in foreign affairs.Thomas – Focused on historical practice of using tariffs as trade tools.Alito – Concerned about practical impacts and the large reliance interests ($133B already collected). 5. Predicted Outcome (from the document’s speaker) Expected ruling: 5–4 in favor of Trump, upholding tariff authority.Predicted majority: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh + either Barrett or Gorsuch.Reasoning: Court is reluctant to disrupt years of foreign policy and economic decisions already relying on the tariffs.Institutional stability concerns—similar to Roberts’ reasoning in the Affordable Care Act case. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      36 min
    • BONUS POD: Media Tried Linking Trump to Epstein — a Phone Call in 2006 Just Blew That Up

      BONUS POD: Media Tried Linking Trump to Epstein — a Phone Call in 2006 Just Blew That Up
      Feb 10 2026

      1. Trump’s 2006 Call to Police About Epstein

      • According to a 2019 FBI interview with the Palm Beach police chief, Donald Trump called the chief in 2006, saying:
        • Epstein’s behavior with underage girls was widely known.
        • Ghislaine Maxwell was “evil” and should be investigated.
      • Trump said he left an event when he saw teenagers present and later banned Epstein from Mar‑a‑Lago.

      2. Contrast With Media Narratives

      • These details contradict media implications that Trump hid involvement with Epstein.
      • It frames Trump as wanting Epstein stopped early in the investigation.

      3. Trump Responds to Questions About Epstein Files

      • During a recent Oval Office exchange, CNN’s Caitlin Collins asked about redactions in released Epstein documents.
      • Trump stated:
        • Too much was released, not too little.
        • The country should “move on.”
        • Nothing incriminating about him emerged.

      4. Ghislaine Maxwell’s Congressional Deposition

      • Maxwell appeared virtually before the House Oversight Committee.
      • She invoked the Fifth Amendment for every question, including:
        • Whether she was close to Epstein
        • Whether she helped traffic girls
        • Whether she instructed girls to provide sexual favors
        • Whether she surrounded herself and Epstein with influential people
        • Whether she would name other co‑conspirators
      • Her lawyer stated she is protecting her appeal.
      • Lawmakers received no substantive answers.

      Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

      X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

      YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

      See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      12 min
    • SuperBowl, CA Taxes, Follow the DEI Money & VA Assault on Democracy

      SuperBowl, CA Taxes, Follow the DEI Money & VA Assault on Democracy
      Feb 9 2026
      1. Super Bowl & Cultural Commentary The discussion opens with dismissive reactions to the Super Bowl halftime show, particularly focusing on Bad Bunny.The Celebrity political signaling is a cultural backlash as exaggerated or performative.Cultural change is being pushed by elites rather than organically embraced. 2. California Tax Policy Critique California’s tax system punishes high earners and visiting performers, especially athletes.Example cited: NFL player bonuses allegedly being taxed at levels exceeding the bonus itself due to “duty day” rules.California is economically self-destructive, encouraging talent and businesses to leave the state.Texas and other low-tax states are contrasted as more economically rational alternatives. 3. “Follow the Money” – DEI & Philanthropy Mellon funding is: Promoting DEI-focused hiringEncouraging identity-based academic disciplinesInfluencing faculty pipelines from undergraduate fellowships through tenure-track positions This funding results in racial discrimination, ideological conformity, and activist scholarship, rather than academic merit. 4. Transformation of Higher Education Universities are depicted as having shifted from traditional scholarship toward activist-driven ideologies.Fields like military history or classical studies are framed as marginalized, while intersectional or abolitionist studies are favored.Philanthropic foundations are blamed for reshaping academia without democratic accountability. 5. Political Activism & Protest Funding Anti-ICE protests are described as organized, rehearsed, and financially backed, not grassroots.Protesters allegedly admit to being paid, reinforcing the claim that activism is professionally funded.This is framed as evidence of manufactured dissent and coordinated political agitation. 6. Virginia Governance & Immigration Policy Virginia’s Democratic leadership is accused of: Cutting cooperation with ICEReleasing criminal undocumented immigrantsAdvancing aggressive redistricting reforms These actions are framed as an “assault on democracy” and a warning sign ahead of future elections.There is no longer a meaningful distinction between moderate and radical Democrats. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
      Afficher plus Afficher moins
      34 min
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment