Couverture de Tribe Over Truth in Taiwan

Tribe Over Truth in Taiwan

Tribe Over Truth in Taiwan

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails

À propos de ce contenu audio

 🎙️ Peaked Tribe Over Truth in Taiwan Host: Róisín Michaux 🎙️ Episode Overview I have a daily Google alert for online mentions of the phrase "anti-gender movement" and a couple of weeks ago, I got an alert that the phrase had been used in a Taiwanese online magazine called New Bloom. Fresh off the Taiwanese boxing Olympic scandal, I was curious to see if it was being used in the context of noted bloke Lin Yu Ting's defeat over female boxers in Paris. An American expat called Jaclynn Joyce was mentioned in the article as one of Taiwan's "anti-gender movement actors". When I looked her up, I found out she's a feminist academic. She's written for 4W, just like me, and she's opposed to the erasure of women as a sex class, just like me. She's also a Substacker. So I contacted her to tell her she had been listed as a major player in the anti-gender movement of her adopted country, and it turned out it's a concept she had never even heard of. Fellow professional bigotress Genevieve Gluck then spotted that the article had been sponsored by a new-ish American NGO, spawned by nasty lesbian-fetishist Dave "Susan" Stryker (I don't know his real name but all transvestites are "Dave" until proven otherwise.) Stryker is a big wheel down at the gender factory. He wrote some important trans retcon canon that gets cited a lot. Also, in the early aughts, he teamed up with Wythenshawe's hardest-working lesbophobe, a lesbian called Stephen Whittle, and together they wrote up a piece of scholarship (scoff) that atempted to blend rabildly horny transvestites and Vichy lezzers into one big vague "transgender" puree. So what is the "anti-gender movement" that Jaclynn was unknowingly the ringleader of? It is (or was) a kind of catch-all term for anyone with conservative views of the family, reproduction, and sexuality. The term started to be used in the 90s when conservatives were confronted with feminists' use of the analytical concept of "gender" to talk about the causes of inequality between men and women. Gender was gradually being introduced in the context of the huge UN conferences that dealt with population "management" aka women's fertility, and the poverty that comes with failing to control it. The Vatican delegation to these conferences had been keeping an eye on family-wrecking feminists, and they called this newfangled idea "gender ideology". They came out firmly against it, claiming men and women were sorted by God and nature into Tarzan (capable, strong, rational, finds food) and Jane (little, quiet, simple, organises food into sandwiches) and the idea that anything about society was artificially constructed was laughable. Feminists, in turn, started to call the conservative protagonists "anti-gender actors". Which is weird, because you would think they would also be against gender, being as it is a set of suffocating and limiting stereotypes and expectations? It's complicated. Indeed, many people have wondered why feminists stopped talking about women and men and start talking about gender instead. One explanation I've read is that it was an effort to de-shrillify the discourse, and get taken seriously by the men in suits who had controlled the conversation since basically forever. Gender took the nagginess out of describing male dominance over women, in that it's very polite about the perpetrators of a problem. It would be like rebranding femicide simply "murder" because you don't want to nag the femicidaires. You wouldn't want to remind the master of the universe of his bitch wife, would you? ("I get enough of this from 'er indoors!" the men exclaim, filling the Geneva conference chamber with cigar smoke and spittle.) Whatever. It was a gradual takeover: the word gender appeared only once in the 1979 CEDAW convention (a kind of international bill of women's rights) — though in that instance, it seems to have been used to refer to biological sex. By 1994, the very important Cairo population conference declaration was gender-free. But by the time the Beijing conference on women came around the following year, in 1995, the word was dotted all through the conference declaration. In the annex to the Beijing declaration, however, conservatives made sure to note that it had been agreed that gender referred to the ye olde binary of men and women, aka a polite synonym for sex. But ever since Beijing, all bets are off. It's now wall-to-wall gender. As we all know, today's elite-overproduced professional feminists have fallen back in love with stereotypes and rather than tear them down , they build entire careers by signing on to the troonterpretation of gender, which is: girl is when skirt go spinny. So while gender once denoted roles imposed on people with female bodies, it now refers to putting tits on men so they can act out feminine social roles. For boners. This is shit for women, but it makes autogynephiles feel less bad about their weird sexual kink, and it gives young ...
Les membres Amazon Prime bénéficient automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts chez Audible.

Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?

Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.
Bonne écoute !
    Aucun commentaire pour le moment