Send us a text

A monk, a deadline, and a three-foot manuscript: that’s the wild origin story pinned to the Codex Gigas, better known as the Devil’s Bible. We start with the familiar grind of procrastination and pressure, then step into the stark world of immurement—the “bloodless” punishment that sharpened one scribe’s stakes—and ask how an ordinary act of painstaking craft became the stuff of legend.

We unpack what’s actually inside this colossal 13th-century codex: the entire Bible, Josephus, Isidore’s encyclopedia, Bohemian history, medical recipes, rites of exorcism, and a calendar of saints, all written with a hand so steady it looks like a single scribe over decades. Then we meet the image that hijacked the book’s identity: the full-page demon on 577, facing Jerusalem. It’s the portrait that launched a thousand stories, from “infernal scorch marks” to a one-night miracle. We weigh the myth against paleography, page counts, and the slow realities of medieval scriptoria, and we trace the manuscript’s wild journey through Rudolf II’s cabinet of curiosities, war looting, and a literal toss from a burning palace window.

Along the way, we connect Roman and medieval ideas of “bloodless” punishment to the chosen enclosure of anchorites, then circle back to Herman Inclusus—“the Enclosed”—and why his epithet invites a story too good to fact-check. The real question emerges: why do we keep the myth when the truth is already impressive? From missing pages to centuries of display that darkened one leaf, the clues point to a simpler answer and a deeper instinct. The legend wins because it offers meaning, danger, and a clean moral frame. And it still echoes today in our modern “Faustian bargains”—viral fame, shortcut success, and the seduction of spectacle over accuracy.

If you like history with teeth, manuscripts with mystery, and conversations that balance skepticism with wonder, hit play. Then tell us: which would you choose—the truth, or the better story? Subscribe, share with a friend who loves weird history, and leave a review to help more curious listeners find the show.

Support the show

Send us a text

A learning game that doesn’t coddle you but still teaches with precision and care—that’s the rabbit hole we fall into as we trace edutainment’s highs and lows from Oregon Trail to one of the strangest state-funded titles of the 90s: Cosmology of Kyoto. We start with the familiar—why some school-approved games clicked while others felt like worksheets with sprites—then step into Heian-era streets where choices carry karmic weight, NPCs unsettle as often as they inform, and death opens onto layered Buddhist hells before returning you to your body to try again.

What grabbed us is how the game fuses atmosphere, systems, and scholarship. The encyclopedia quietly fills with texture—markets, fish, class, ritual—while the world itself demands attention to consequence. A karma meter tracks how you move through Kyoto; bad actions can lead to reincarnation into lesser states or a harrowing tour of Naraka. It’s not shock for shock’s sake. The imagery, the silence, and the black horizons are working together to teach context: how belief, scarcity, and risk shaped life in that period. We compare it with Oregon Trail’s choice logic, Myst’s exploratory design, and the broader 90s tech aesthetic that accidentally created mood through constraints.

Along the way, we ask harder questions: Should education be comfortable? What happens when a curriculum refuses to sanitize fear or suffering? Is this actually better for adult learning than the cheerful trivia of classic edutainment? By the end, we’re convinced Cosmology of Kyoto isn’t just a curiosity—it’s a bold prototype for how games can teach history, culture, and ethics without talking down to the player.

If you’re into game history, cultural design, or just love a good, unsettling story that doubles as a lesson, press play. Then tell us: genius, misfire, or both? Subscribe, share with a friend who loved Oregon Trail, and leave a review with your take on whether learning should sometimes hurt.

Support the show

Send us a text

What makes some stories transcend time while others fade away? King Arthur's legend has captivated audiences for over 1,500 years, morphing with each retelling while somehow maintaining its essential power. This fascinating deep dive traces the evolution of Arthurian legend from its misty origins to its modern interpretations.

We begin by exploring the differences between myths and legends. While myths typically explain natural phenomena through sacred stories that remain static, legends grow organically through retellings, adapting to each generation's needs. The Arthurian legend exemplifies this evolution perfectly – what likely began as tales of a skilled warrior fighting Saxon invaders in post-Roman Britain transformed into an elaborate tapestry featuring magical swords, tragic love triangles, and quests for holy artifacts.

Our journey through Arthur's literary history takes us from Victorian poet Alfred Lord Tennyson's moralistic "Idylls of the King" back to Thomas Malory's comprehensive "Le Morte d'Arthur" (1485), which consolidated disparate tales into what we now consider the canonical Arthur story. Going further back, we examine Geoffrey of Monmouth's 12th-century pseudo-historical account before arriving at the earliest reference to Arthur – a simple comparison in a Welsh poem from around 600 CE suggesting Arthur was already famous enough that readers would understand the reference.

The historical hunt for a "real" Arthur leads to tantalizing possibilities. Was he based on Roman cavalry commander Lucius Artorius Castus? Could he have been Ambrosius Aurelianus, a Romano-British war leader mentioned in early accounts? Or perhaps he represents a composite of multiple warriors whose exploits merged in cultural memory? While the evidence remains inconclusive, what's clear is how each society reimagined Arthur to reflect their own values and concerns – from resistance against invaders to models of chivalry and moral leadership.

Whether Arthur pulled a sword from stone or gathered knights at a round table matters less than what his enduring legend reveals about us. As we discuss in this episode, "The stories are true, even though they never happened." Arthur's legend continues to resonate because it speaks to something deeper than historical fact – it captures ideals of leadership, justice, and human frailty that feel eternally relevant, proving that sometimes legends tell us more about ourselves than history ever could.

Support the show