After the devastating dog attack that seriously injured Avery Russell, Ohio lawmakers passed Avery's Law to strengthen the state's dangerous dog statutes and increase accountability for owners of designated dangerous dogs.
But does the new law accomplish its goal?
In this episode of The Animal Welfare Junction, Dr. G is joined by Dana Pannella, Esq., an Ohio attorney with extensive experience in dangerous dog law, to examine what Avery's Law actually says, how it changes liability for dog owners and professionals, and why some of its language may create unintended consequences.
- Together they discuss:
- The attack that inspired Avery's Law
- How Ohio's dangerous dog laws changed
- The new liability requirements for owners of designated dangerous dogs
- The requirement to carry at least $100,000 in liability insurance—and the challenges many owners face obtaining coverage
- Why the statutory definition of a "dangerous dog" may be broader than many people realize
- How incidents involving injury may be interpreted under the law, even when the dog's behavior or the surrounding circumstances are disputed
- What veterinarians, animal control officers, trainers, shelters, rescues, and dog owners need to know
- Practical recommendations for reducing risk and staying compliant
This episode explores both the strengths and potential shortcomings of Avery's Law, with a focus on helping listeners understand what the law requires, who it affects, and why the definition of a "dangerous dog" matters.
Whether you're a dog owner, veterinarian, attorney, animal control officer, trainer, rescue volunteer, or simply interested in animal law, this conversation provides important insight into one of Ohio's most significant recent changes to dangerous dog legislation.
Guest: Dana Pannella, Esq.
👍 If you found this episode helpful, please like, subscribe, and share to support evidence-based discussions on animal welfare, veterinary medicine, forensic science, and animal law.
*This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Individuals with questions about their specific circumstances should consult a qualified attorney.*