Épisodes

  • Trump Throws Down on Iran, Sanctuary Cities, Interest Rates & the Border in One Explosive Interview

    Trump Throws Down on Iran, Sanctuary Cities, Interest Rates & the Border in One Explosive Interview
    Feb 11 2026
    1. Iran & Middle East Policy Trump warns Iran to “not be foolish” and to accept a new nuclear/missile deal.He signals possible deployment of a second U.S. aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East if negotiations fail.References Operation Midnight Hammer, the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites six months earlier, framing it as a precedent for future action.Iran insists negotiations be limited only to enrichment levels and rejects including missiles or regional proxy forces.Netanyahu is meeting Trump at the White House, emphasizing U.S.–Israel alignment on Iran. 2. U.S. Border & Immigration Trump says the U.S. currently has the strongest border in U.S. history, stating “essentially no illegal crossings in 8 months.”Says maritime drug interdictions reduced drug flow by 33% and saved 25,000 American lives. Argues his administration doesn’t receive enough credit due to “public relations problems.” 3. Sanctuary Cities Trump calls sanctuary cities “sanctuaries for criminals,” claiming they protect killers, drug lords, and gang members.Says Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing hard to eliminate sanctuary cities, and Trump backs him “100%.”Points to New York City spending billions on migrants as evidence of the cost of sanctuary policies. 4. Minnesota Fraud Investigation Trump alleges $19 billion in fraud in Minnesota related to medical programs and other aid. Says Somali immigrants are responsible for significant fraud, including referencing a “fake congresswoman.”States that recovering even 50% of nationwide fraud would “balance the budget without cuts.” 5. Federal Reserve & Interest Rates Trump says appointing Jerome Powell was a mistake and was influenced by his Treasury Secretary.Argues interest rates should be the lowest in the world, lower than Switzerland’s.Says lowering rates by two points would eliminate the U.S. deficit “on paper.” 6. Trade Policy Trump says past presidents, including Ronald Reagan, were “bad on trade” and allowed Japan and Germany to gain U.S. market share.Says the U.S. had deficits with almost every country before he arrived.Emphasizes he is “real good on trade,” contrasting himself with previous administrations. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    13 min
  • Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen

    Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen
    Feb 11 2026
    1. The Case at the Supreme Court The case is Trump v. Vos Selections, argued on Nov. 5, 2025.Small businesses are challenging Trump-era tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 2. Central Legal Questions Does IEEPA’s power to “regulate imports” include authority to impose tariffs?Did Congress delegate too much taxing authority to the President?→ This triggers two major constitutional doctrines: Non‑Delegation Doctrine – Congress cannot hand over core lawmaking powers (like taxation) without clear limits.Major Questions Doctrine – Major economic or political actions require explicit congressional authorization. 3. Constitutional Tension Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to: Lay and collect taxes/tariffsRegulate commerce with foreign nations Tariffs sit at the intersection of foreign policy (executive power) and taxation (legislative power). 4. Oral Argument Themes Justices skeptical of Trump’s argument: Roberts – Concerned tariffs are fundamentally taxes on Americans, which is Congress’s domain.Gorsuch & Barrett – Pressed the need for clear statutory limits; worried about unchecked executive authority. Justices leaning toward upholding the tariffs: Kavanaugh – Emphasized long history of broad presidential discretion in foreign affairs.Thomas – Focused on historical practice of using tariffs as trade tools.Alito – Concerned about practical impacts and the large reliance interests ($133B already collected). 5. Predicted Outcome (from the document’s speaker) Expected ruling: 5–4 in favor of Trump, upholding tariff authority.Predicted majority: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh + either Barrett or Gorsuch.Reasoning: Court is reluctant to disrupt years of foreign policy and economic decisions already relying on the tariffs.Institutional stability concerns—similar to Roberts’ reasoning in the Affordable Care Act case. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    36 min
  • Media Tried Linking Trump to Epstein — a Phone Call in 2006 Just Blew That Up

    Media Tried Linking Trump to Epstein — a Phone Call in 2006 Just Blew That Up
    Feb 10 2026

    1. Trump’s 2006 Call to Police About Epstein

    • According to a 2019 FBI interview with the Palm Beach police chief, Donald Trump called the chief in 2006, saying:
      • Epstein’s behavior with underage girls was widely known.
      • Ghislaine Maxwell was “evil” and should be investigated.
    • Trump said he left an event when he saw teenagers present and later banned Epstein from Mar‑a‑Lago.

    2. Contrast With Media Narratives

    • These details contradict media implications that Trump hid involvement with Epstein.
    • It frames Trump as wanting Epstein stopped early in the investigation.

    3. Trump Responds to Questions About Epstein Files

    • During a recent Oval Office exchange, CNN’s Caitlin Collins asked about redactions in released Epstein documents.
    • Trump stated:
      • Too much was released, not too little.
      • The country should “move on.”
      • Nothing incriminating about him emerged.

    4. Ghislaine Maxwell’s Congressional Deposition

    • Maxwell appeared virtually before the House Oversight Committee.
    • She invoked the Fifth Amendment for every question, including:
      • Whether she was close to Epstein
      • Whether she helped traffic girls
      • Whether she instructed girls to provide sexual favors
      • Whether she surrounded herself and Epstein with influential people
      • Whether she would name other co‑conspirators
    • Her lawyer stated she is protecting her appeal.
    • Lawmakers received no substantive answers.

    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    12 min
  • Halftime Headliner Hates Half the Country-Expanding the Audience or Losing America?

    Halftime Headliner Hates Half the Country-Expanding the Audience or Losing America?
    Feb 9 2026

    1. Politicization of the Super Bowl Halftime Show

    • The halftime show is no longer neutral entertainment but a platform for left-wing political messaging.
    • Bad Bunny’s selection is framed as intentional ideological signaling rather than artistic choice.
    • Many viewers allegedly opted out and watched an alternative, America-focused broadcast instead.

    2. Criticism of Bad Bunny’s Political Activism

    • Bad Bunny is openly hostile to U.S. immigration enforcement (ICE), Donald Trump, and conservative politics.
    • His past statements and performances are cited as evidence of anti-American sentiment, including:
      • Anti-ICE speeches at award shows
      • Support for Black Lives Matter protests, including justification of unrest
      • Use of explicit anti-Trump language
    • His refusal to tour in the U.S. and insistence on performing only in Spanish are framed as ideological acts.

    3. Cultural Division and Language Controversy

    • Performing exclusively in Spanish is characterized as a deliberate rejection of American norms.
    • Critics argue this alienated large portions of the Super Bowl audience.
    • Supporters within the discussion downplay the issue, suggesting cultural exposure is harmless.

    4. NFL’s Role and Motivation

    • The NFL is accused of “selling out” American audiences to expand global and non-U.S. markets.
    • League leadership defends the decision as inclusive and unifying, which the commentary strongly disputes.
    • The NFL is portrayed as indifferent to political backlash as long as viewership grows.

    5. Reaction from Donald Trump and Conservatives

    • Donald Trump’s reaction is heavily featured, condemning the halftime show as:
      • One of the worst ever
      • Inappropriate for families
      • Disrespectful to American values
    • Conservative commentators echo these criticisms but differ on how much outrage is warranted.

    6. Broader Commentary on Celebrity Politics

    • Several speakers express fatigue with celebrities using entertainment platforms to push political views.
    • While disliking Bad Bunny’s politics, some argue that outrage over halftime shows is overblown.

    7. Shift to California Tax Policy

    • Example: An NFL player (Sam Darnold) allegedly owed more in California taxes than he earned in game bonuses.
    • California is portrayed as economically hostile to high earners, encouraging talent to leave the state.

    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    18 min
  • SuperBowl, CA Taxes, Follow the DEI Money & VA Assault on Democracy

    SuperBowl, CA Taxes, Follow the DEI Money & VA Assault on Democracy
    Feb 9 2026
    1. Super Bowl & Cultural Commentary The discussion opens with dismissive reactions to the Super Bowl halftime show, particularly focusing on Bad Bunny.The Celebrity political signaling is a cultural backlash as exaggerated or performative.Cultural change is being pushed by elites rather than organically embraced. 2. California Tax Policy Critique California’s tax system punishes high earners and visiting performers, especially athletes.Example cited: NFL player bonuses allegedly being taxed at levels exceeding the bonus itself due to “duty day” rules.California is economically self-destructive, encouraging talent and businesses to leave the state.Texas and other low-tax states are contrasted as more economically rational alternatives. 3. “Follow the Money” – DEI & Philanthropy Mellon funding is: Promoting DEI-focused hiringEncouraging identity-based academic disciplinesInfluencing faculty pipelines from undergraduate fellowships through tenure-track positions This funding results in racial discrimination, ideological conformity, and activist scholarship, rather than academic merit. 4. Transformation of Higher Education Universities are depicted as having shifted from traditional scholarship toward activist-driven ideologies.Fields like military history or classical studies are framed as marginalized, while intersectional or abolitionist studies are favored.Philanthropic foundations are blamed for reshaping academia without democratic accountability. 5. Political Activism & Protest Funding Anti-ICE protests are described as organized, rehearsed, and financially backed, not grassroots.Protesters allegedly admit to being paid, reinforcing the claim that activism is professionally funded.This is framed as evidence of manufactured dissent and coordinated political agitation. 6. Virginia Governance & Immigration Policy Virginia’s Democratic leadership is accused of: Cutting cooperation with ICEReleasing criminal undocumented immigrantsAdvancing aggressive redistricting reforms These actions are framed as an “assault on democracy” and a warning sign ahead of future elections.There is no longer a meaningful distinction between moderate and radical Democrats. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    34 min
  • California’s Homeless Crisis Was a Cash Cow for Fraudsters

    California’s Homeless Crisis Was a Cash Cow for Fraudsters
    Feb 7 2026
    1. Large-Scale Individual Fraud Example A Los Angeles contractor, Alexander Suker, is accused of stealing $23 million intended to feed and house homeless individuals.Funds were allegedly used for luxury homes, cars, vacations, designer goods, and private schools, instead of homeless services. 2. Failure to Deliver Promised Services Suker was contracted to provide three meals per day to up to 600 homeless people.Inspections reportedly found only canned beans and ramen noodles, contradicting billing claims.Prosecutors allege the use of fake vendors, falsified facilities, and false service records. 3. Broader Pattern of Fraud in California Federal authorities indicate at least 12 additional similar cases under investigation.A U.S. Attorney stated that large sums were pushed out quickly with minimal vetting or checks and balances. 4. Comparison to Other State Scandals Investigators and commentators compare California’s situation to Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud, claiming California’s fraud may be larger in scale.Independent investigator Nick Shirley claims billions of dollars may be involved statewide. 5. Alleged Billions in Unaccounted Public Funds $70 billion in taxpayer funds missing or unaccounted for$24 billion spent on allegedly nonexistent homelessness programs$18 billion on nonfunctional high-speed rail$32 billion in stolen COVID relief funds$2.5 billion lost to SNAP fraud 6. Political and Structural Implications California leadership is accused of enabling fraud by prioritizing rapid spending over accountability.Calls are made for whistleblower lawsuits as a tool to recover funds.Critics argue that higher taxes are being proposed despite massive losses. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    12 min
  • The UN has Their Hat Out, Why the Netflix Merger is paramount in Entertainment & Americans Agree on Voter ID Week In Review

    The UN has Their Hat Out, Why the Netflix Merger is paramount in Entertainment & Americans Agree on Voter ID Week In Review
    Feb 7 2026
    1. United Nations Funding Crisis The United Nations is facing financial collapse because the United States has reduced or withdrawn funding.This is a move to stop funding “woke” & ideological programs.The UN is ineffective, bureaucratic, and overly dependent on U.S. taxpayer money.Symbolic examples (turned-off escalators, reduced heating) are used to emphasize desperation and mismanagement.The U.S. withdrew from 66 international organizations and treaties, framed as: Cost-savingAnti-globalistPro-American sovereignty Many of these organizations are described as obscure, wasteful, or hostile to U.S. interests.The underlying message is that global institutions dilute U.S. power without delivering value. 2. Media Merger and National Security Concerns Focus shifts to a major media merger (Netflix / Warner Bros / Paramount context).Concerns raised include: Foreign influence, especially money from the Middle East or ChinaNational security implicationsLoss of American cultural control The argument is that entertainment media shapes public perception more than news.Hollywood and major streaming platforms are portrayed as: Predominantly left-wingHostile to conservative viewpointsEngaged in ideological indoctrination Executives are challenged on whether their content fairly represents conservatives.The inability to name conservative-oriented programming is used as evidence of bias.The merger is framed as dangerous because it could: Concentrate cultural and political influenceAmplify a single ideological viewpoint The Department of Justice and FCC are identified as key gatekeepers.The timeline for approval is described as months to years, with high stakes for media freedom. 3. Save America Act (Voter ID Legislation) Proof of U.S. citizenship to register to votePhoto ID to vote The bill is common-sense and widely supported, including among minority voters.Democrats, particularly Chuck Schumer, are accused of: Using “Jim Crow” rhetoric to scare votersIgnoring polling that shows broad support for voter ID Opposition is attributed to: Desire to preserve election vulnerabilitiesPartisan strategy rather than public opinion Ballot harvesting is described as inherently vulnerable to abuse.Examples (nursing homes, paid operatives) are used to argue: Elderly and vulnerable voters can be exploitedBallots can be selectively discarded The Carter–Baker Commission is cited to legitimize these concerns.Acknowledges internal Republican resistance and logistical challenges.Emphasizes urgency and political pressure as tools to pass the bill. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    34 min
  • WH Launches TrumpRx.gov, Promising Major Cuts to Prescription Drug Prices

    WH Launches TrumpRx.gov, Promising Major Cuts to Prescription Drug Prices
    Feb 6 2026
    1. Launch of TrumpRx.gov The White House announced and launched TrumpRx.gov, a federal website designed to provide Americans access to significantly discounted prescription drugs.The platform allows patients with valid prescriptions to obtain savings via manufacturer-supported coupons, downloadable or printable, integrated through the website. 2. Most Favored Nation (MFN) Drug Pricing Model The initiative is based on Most Favored Nation pricing, meaning U.S. patients pay prices comparable to the lowest prices paid by other developed nations.The document argues Americans have historically overpaid due to pharmaceutical lobbying and systemic corruption, which MFN pricing aims to correct. 3. Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Participation Initial participating manufacturers include: AstraZenecaEli LillyNovo NordiskPfizer Additional drugs and manufacturers are expected to be added over time as more MFN pricing agreements are finalized. 4. Major Drug Price Reductions (Examples) The document highlights dramatic price cuts on high‑cost, high‑usage medications: Diabetes & Weight‑Loss Drugs Ozempic‑type injectables: ~$1,000+ → as low as $199/monthWegovy: ~$1,349 → as low as $149Zepbound: ~$1,088 → as low as $299–$346 Insulin Available for as low as $25/month Respiratory Medications COPD inhalers: ~$500 → $51Asthma inhalers: ~$504 → $201 Menopause/Osteoporosis Drug Duavee: ~$202 → $30 These examples are presented as evidence of the “largest prescription drug price reduction in U.S. history.” 5. Fertility Drug Cost Relief Fertility medications are emphasized as a major priority due to high out‑of‑pocket costs.Families may save over $2,000 per IVF cycle on average.Example reductions include: One fertility drug reduced to $168 per penAnother reduced to $22–$50 Personal testimony is used to highlight the financial burden of infertility treatments. 6. Policy and Legislative Timeline Key policy milestones cited in the document: May 12, 2025 – Executive Order signed: Delivering Most Favored Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American PatientsJuly 31, 2025 – Letters sent to major drug manufacturers outlining required price reductionsSince September 2025 – 16 MFN pricing deals announced with pharmaceutical companiesDecember 1, 2025 – Agreement with the UK to raise its drug prices by 25%, shifting more costs overseasJanuary 15, 2026 – Call for Congress to pass the “Great Healthcare Plan” to codify savings and increase transparency Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Afficher plus Afficher moins
    10 min