In episode 17 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Bowe v United States. There are two issues in this case:

(1) Whether Section 2255(h)'s cross-reference to Section 2244 includes Section 2244(b)(3)(E), thereby barring the Supreme Court from exercising certiori jurisdiction over federal prisoners' petitions for authorization to file second or successve petitions for postconviction relief.

(2) Whether the same cross-reference includes Section 2244(b)(1), thereby barring federal prisoners' petitions for postconviction relief if they raise claims raised in previous petitions.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5438_o7kq.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 16 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Dewberry Group Inc v Dewberry Engineers Inc. At issue in this case, whether courts can treat corporate affiliates as one corporate entity for calculating a defendant's profits under the Lanham Act.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r15_dc8f.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 15 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Waetzig v Halliburton Energy Services Inc. At issue in this case, whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Prodecure 41(a) counts as a "final proceeding" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r14_6kg7.pdf

LInktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 14 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Glossip v Oklahoma. At issue in this case, whether the state of Oklahoma violated Richard Glossip's 14th Amendment rights by knowingly allowing false testimony to stand at trial, in violation of Napue v Illinois, and the proper remedy if so.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r13_c0n2.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 13 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Lackey v Stinnie. At issue in this case, the meaning of the phrase "prevailing party" in Section 1988, a fee shifting statute.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r12_8njq.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 12 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Doe v Dynamic Physical Therapy. At issue in this case, whether Louisiana courts erred in applying a state immunity statute to bar a federal claim.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-180_8m59.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 11 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Clark v Sweeny. At issue in this case, whether the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit violated the principle of party presentation by ordering a new trial on the basis of a different claim than the one brought before it.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-52_4gd5.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

In episode 10 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Pitts v Mississippi. At issue in this case, whether Mississippi violated a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to face a child witness by failing to make case-specific determinations of necessity before placing a barrier between him and the witness.

Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1159_k536.pdf

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread